| Literature DB >> 32765510 |
Verena Harpf1, Günter Rambach1, Reinhard Würzner1, Cornelia Lass-Flörl1, Cornelia Speth1.
Abstract
Candida is a dominant fungal pathogen in immunocompromised hosts, leading to opportunistic infections. Complement with its multifaceted functions is involved in the immune defense against this yeast, and recently several novel aspects have emerged in this old battle. It is clear that Candida can adopt both roles as a colonizer or as a pathogen. In our article, we focus on the molecular mechanisms of the Candida-complement interplay, which occur in disseminated disease as well as locally on skin or on mucous membranes in mouth and vagina; the mechanisms can be supposed to be the same. Activation of the complement system by Candida is facilitated by directly triggering the three dominant pathways, but also indirectly via the coagulation and fibrinolysis systems. The complement-mediated anti-Candida effects induced thereby clearly extend chemotaxis, opsonization, and phagocytosis, and even the membrane attack complex formed on the fungal surface plays a modulatory role, although lysis of the yeast per se cannot be induced due to the thick fungal cell wall. In order to avoid the hostile action of complement, several evasion mechanisms have evolved during co-evolution, comprising the avoidance of recognition, and destruction. The latter comes in many flavors, in particular the cleavage of complement proteins by yeast enzymes and the exploitation of regulatory proteins by recruiting them on the cell wall, such as factor H. The rationale behind that is that the fluid phase regulators on the fungal cell surface down-regulate complement locally. Interestingly, however, evasion protein knockout strains do not necessarily lead to an attenuated disease, so it is likely more complex in vivo than initially thought. The interactions between complement and non-albicans species also deserve attention, especially Candida auris, a recently identified drug-resistant species of medical importance. This is in particular worth investigating, as deciphering of these interactions may lead to alternative anti-fungal therapies directly targeting the molecular mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Candida; complement; evasion; factor H; innate immunity; invasive fungal infections
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32765510 PMCID: PMC7381207 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Structure of factor H (FH) and factor H-like protein 1 (FHL-1). Depicted are selected functions of short consensus repeats (SCR), illustrated as squares, and the known binding sites of the FH-binding proteins phosphoglycerate mutase 1 (Gpm1), pH-regulated antigen 1 (Pra1), and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 2 (Gpd2). For further details and references, see text.
Figure 2Pathways of complement activation by Candida, either directly or by affecting the contact system, fibrinolysis system, or coagulation system. For further details, see text.
Overview of the different types of complement evasion performed by Candida species and the underlying mechanisms. For further details, see text.
| Masking | Sheath of mannan covering β-glucan layer providing resistance against alternative pathway activation | ( | |
| Cleavage and blocking of complement proteins | Sap1-Sap3 degrade C3b, C4b, and C5 inhibiting opsonization by C3b and generation of anaphylatoxin C5a | ( | |
| Sap2 cleaves FH, eliminating FH-mediated bridge between pathogen and neutrophils | ( | ||
| Sap2 interferes with CR3 and CR4 expression on macrophages | ( | ||
| Sapp1 and Sapp2 cleave C3b, C4b and FH | ( | ||
| Sapp2 degrades FHR5 | ( | ||
| Pra1 cleaves C3 at a unique site; the resulting C3a-like fragment has no effector functions and the C3b-like fragment is also not active and further degraded by FI and FH | ( | ||
| Pra1 blocks C3a derived from the action of C3 convertases | ( | ||
| Recruitment of complement regulators | Acquisition of FH, FHL-1 by | ( | |
| Acquisition of vitronectin by Gpm1 inhibiting C5b-7 insertion and C9 polymerization | ( | ||
| Acquisition of C4BP by | ( | ||
| Acquisition of plasminogen by | ( |
Figure 3Mechanisms of complement evasion by Candida. The different evasion mechanisms affecting the complete flow of the complement cascade are indicated by triangles and labeled with mk (masking; red triangles), aq (acquisition; blue triangles), cl (cleavage; green triangles), and bl (blocking; yellow triangles). VN, vitronectin; PLMG, Plasminogen; PLM, Plasmin; FH, factor H. For further details and references, see text.