Literature DB >> 32764130

Predicting Stomatal Closure and Turgor Loss in Woody Plants Using Predawn and Midday Water Potential.

Thorsten Knipfer1,2, Nicolas Bambach3, M Isabel Hernandez3, Megan K Bartlett3, Gabriela Sinclair3, Fiona Duong3, Daniel A Kluepfel4, Andrew J McElrone3,4.   

Abstract

Knowledge about physiological stress thresholds provides crucial information about plant performance and survival under drought. In this study, we report on the triphasic nature of the relationship between plant water potential (Ψ) at predawn and midday and describe a method that predicts Ψ at stomatal closure and turgor loss exclusively from this water potential curve (WP curve). The method is based on a piecewise linear regression model that was developed to predict the boundaries (termed Θ1 and Θ2) separating the three phases of the curve and corresponding slope values. The method was tested for three economically important woody species. For all species, midday Ψ was much more negative than predawn Ψ during phase I (mild drought), reductions in midday Ψ were minor while predawn Ψ continued to decline during phase II (moderate drought), and midday and predawn Ψ reached similar values during phase III (severe drought). Corresponding measurement of leaf gas exchange indicated that boundary Θ1 between phases I and II coincided with Ψ at stomatal closure. Data from pressure-volume curves demonstrated that boundary Θ2 between phases II and III predicted Ψ at leaf turgor loss. The WP curve method described here is an advanced application of the Scholander-type pressure chamber to categorize plant dehydration under drought into three distinct phases and to predict Ψ thresholds of stomatal closure and turgor loss.
© 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32764130      PMCID: PMC7536669          DOI: 10.1104/pp.20.00500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  42 in total

1.  A new validation of the Scholander pressure chamber technique based on stem diameter variations.

Authors:  H Cochard; S Forestier; T Améglio
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Measurement of vulnerability to water stress-induced cavitation in grapevine: a comparison of four techniques applied to a long-vesseled species.

Authors:  Brendan Choat; William M Drayton; Craig Brodersen; Mark A Matthews; Ken A Shackel; Hiroshi Wada; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 7.228

3.  Variations in xylem embolism susceptibility under drought between intact saplings of three walnut species.

Authors:  Thorsten Knipfer; Felipe H Barrios-Masias; Italo F Cuneo; Martin Bouda; Caetano P Albuquerque; Craig R Brodersen; Daniel A Kluepfel; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  A new look at water transport regulation in plants.

Authors:  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Rafael Poyatos; David Aguadé; Javier Retana; Maurizio Mencuccini
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 5.  Pressure-volume curves: revisiting the impact of negative turgor during cell collapse by literature review and simulations of cell micromechanics.

Authors:  Yiting Ding; Yanxiang Zhang; Quan-Shui Zheng; Melvin T Tyree
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 6.  Drought Adaptation Mechanisms Should Guide Experimental Design.

Authors:  Matthew E Gilbert; Viviana Medina
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 18.313

7.  Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress.

Authors:  Celia M Rodriguez-Dominguez; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Passive origins of stomatal control in vascular plants.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghum in response to water deficits.

Authors:  M M Jones
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  The biophysics of leaf growth in salt-stressed barley. A study at the cell level.

Authors:  Wieland Fricke; Winfried S Peters
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  6 in total

1.  Extrapolating Physiological Response to Drought through Step-by-Step Analysis of Water Potential.

Authors:  Guillaume Charrier
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Grapevines under drought do not express esca leaf symptoms.

Authors:  Giovanni Bortolami; Gregory A Gambetta; Cédric Cassan; Silvina Dayer; Elena Farolfi; Nathalie Ferrer; Yves Gibon; Jérôme Jolivet; Pascal Lecomte; Chloé E L Delmas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Extreme undersaturation in the intercellular airspace of leaves: a failure of Gaastra or Ohm?

Authors:  Fulton E Rockwell; N Michele Holbrook; Piyush Jain; Annika E Huber; Sabyasachi Sen; Abraham D Stroock
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.040

4.  Hydraulic Response of Deciduous and Evergreen Broadleaved Shrubs, Grown on Olympus Mountain in Greece, to Vapour Pressure Deficit.

Authors:  Maria Karatassiou; Panagiota Karaiskou; Eleni Verykouki; Sophia Rhizopoulou
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 5.  Optimizing Crop Water Use for Drought and Climate Change Adaptation Requires a Multi-Scale Approach.

Authors:  James D Burridge; Alexandre Grondin; Vincent Vadez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Leaf water potential measurements using the pressure chamber: Synthetic testing of assumptions towards best practices for precision and accuracy.

Authors:  Celia M Rodriguez-Dominguez; Alicia Forner; Sebastia Martorell; Brendan Choat; Rosana Lopez; Jennifer M R Peters; Sebastian Pfautsch; Stefan Mayr; Madeline R Carins-Murphy; Scott A M McAdam; Freya Richardson; Antonio Diaz-Espejo; Virginia Hernandez-Santana; Paulo E Menezes-Silva; Jose M Torres-Ruiz; Timothy A Batz; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 7.947

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.