Literature DB >> 32763344

Susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to UV irradiation.

Christiane Silke Heilingloh1, Ulrich Wilhelm Aufderhorst2, Leonie Schipper1, Ulf Dittmer3, Oliver Witzke1, Dongliang Yang4, Xin Zheng4, Kathrin Sutter3, Mirko Trilling3, Mira Alt1, Eike Steinmann5, Adalbert Krawczyk6.   

Abstract

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic became a global health burden. We determined the susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to irradiation with ultraviolet light. The virus was highly susceptible to ultraviolet light. A viral stock with a high infectious titer of 5 × 106 TCID50/mL was completely inactivated by UVC irradiation after nine minutes of exposure. The UVC dose required for complete inactivation was 1,048 mJ/cm2. UVA exposure demonstrated only a weak effect on virus inactivation over 15 minutes. Hence, inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by UVC irradiation constitutes a reliable method for disinfection purposes in health care facilities and for preparing SARS-CoV-2 material for research purpose.
Copyright © 2020 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Inactivation; Ultraviolet light

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32763344      PMCID: PMC7402275          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


Background

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory disease (SARS-CoV-2) was newly identified in the Hubei province, PR China, before becoming a global pandemic and causing tremendous health and socio-economic burdens. At the time of writing, more than 14.9 million cases and >618,000 deaths were reported worldwide (2020.07.23). The actual number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 is most likely to be much higher since numerous infections, especially in younger people, are asymptomatic and frequently not captured by routine diagnostic methods. The symptoms of COVID-19 range from mild respiratory illness accompanied by cough, fever, myalgia, and fatigue, to severe, life-threatening pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clearly, the prevention of the transmission of respiratory infections especially within hospitals or other institutions is of central importance. The disinfection of objects using UV-irradiation is an environmentally friendly method of killing bacteria, fungi and viruses without the use of harmful chemicals or heat. Consequently, UV light disinfection is becoming increasingly applied in healthcare facilities for disinfecting healthcare equipment, surfaces, and operating rooms. However, the efficacy of UV irradiation on the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 in fluids has not been described thus far. In the present study, we investigated the susceptibility of high titer viral stocks of SARS-CoV-2 to combined or separate UVA and/or UVC irradiation.

Material and Methods

Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal swab

A clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from a nasopharyngeal swab of a patient suffering from COVID-19 disease. The patient was hospitalized at the Department of Infectious Diseases of the University Hospital Essen. The swab was taken using a Virocult vial (Sigma, Germany). The Virocult medium was then incubated on Vero E6 cells cultured in DMEM containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum and supplemented with Penicillin (100 IU/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), Ciprofloxacin (10 µg/mL), and Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL). After 5 days of incubation, the supernatant was harvested and cell debris was removed by centrifugation. Afterwards, 100 µL of the clear supernatant was used for subsequent infection of a new Vero E6 cell culture flask. After 5 days of incubation, supernatants were found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 by a conventional qualitative PCR. The virus suspension was harvested and cleared from cellular debris by centrifugation and stored at −80°C. Viral titers were determined by endpoint dilution assay and the 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) was calculated.

Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by UV-irradiation

To determine the susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to UVA and/or UVC irradiation, a viral stock at a concentration of 5 × 106 TCID50/mL was irradiated with UV light for up to 30 minutes. UV exposure was performed by separate or combined irradiation with UVC (254 nm) and/or UVA (365 nm) of 600 µL virus stock in 24-well plates. The UV light source (UV-4 S/L, order no. 2950440, Herolab, Wiesloch, Germany) was placed at a distance of 3 cm above the bottom of the plate. The emitted light intensity was UVC (254 nm) = 1940 µW/cm2 and UVA (365 nm) = 540 µW/cm2 at a distance of 3 cm, as measured by radiometric analysis. This corresponds to an applied light dose of 1.94 mJ/cm2 per second for UVC and 0.54 mJ/cm2 per second for UVA, while µW = 10−6 J/s. The samples were taken after 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 minutes of combined UVA and UVC irradiation. Samples irradiated with UVA were taken after 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 minutes, and after UVC-irradiation after 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 15 minutes. The TCID50/ml concentration of each sample was determined by endpoint dilution, respectively.

Results

SARS-CoV-2 showed high susceptibility to UV irradiation. Total inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 at a concentration of 5 × 106 TCID50/mL was achieved after 9 minutes of combined UVA and UVC exposure (Fig 1 A). As calculated by nonlinear regression, 50% of the virus could be inactivated after 1.4 minutes of UV-treatment (Fig 1B). UVA exposure alone was less effective on virus inactivation. After 9 minutes of irradiation and an emitted dose of 292 mJ/cm2, 1 log reduction of the viral load was observed. In contrast, complete virus inactivation was achieved after a 9 minute exposure to UVC and an emitted UVC dose of 1048 mJ/cm2. These data confirm former findings that UVC is more effective in inactivating viruses, and highlight UVC irradiation as an effective method for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2.
Fig 1

Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by UV irradiation. SARS-CoV-2 at a starting concentration of 5 × 106 TCID50/ml was irradiated with ultraviolet light (UV). UV treatment was performed by irradiation with UVC (254 nm) and/or UVA (365 nm) on 600 µl aliquots of virus in 24-well plates. The UV light source was placed at a distance of 3 cm above the bottom of the plate. Viral loads were determined by end point dilution after (A) combined UVA/UVC exposure at the indicated time points or separate exposure to (C) UVA light after 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 minutes or (D) UVC light after 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 minutes. (B) Nonlinear regression was conducted to calculate the duration of combined UVA and UVC irradiation sufficient to inactivate the virus by 50%. The emitted light dose was measured with = 1940 µW/cm2 for UVC (254 nm) and 540 µW/cm2 for UVA (365 nm) at a distance of 3 cm. This corresponds to an applied light dose of 1.94 mJ/cm2 per second for UVC and 0.54 mJ/cm2 per second for UVA (µW = 10−6 J/s). The experiments were performed in triplicates. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by UV irradiation. SARS-CoV-2 at a starting concentration of 5 × 106 TCID50/ml was irradiated with ultraviolet light (UV). UV treatment was performed by irradiation with UVC (254 nm) and/or UVA (365 nm) on 600 µl aliquots of virus in 24-well plates. The UV light source was placed at a distance of 3 cm above the bottom of the plate. Viral loads were determined by end point dilution after (A) combined UVA/UVC exposure at the indicated time points or separate exposure to (C) UVA light after 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 minutes or (D) UVC light after 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 minutes. (B) Nonlinear regression was conducted to calculate the duration of combined UVA and UVC irradiation sufficient to inactivate the virus by 50%. The emitted light dose was measured with = 1940 µW/cm2 for UVC (254 nm) and 540 µW/cm2 for UVA (365 nm) at a distance of 3 cm. This corresponds to an applied light dose of 1.94 mJ/cm2 per second for UVC and 0.54 mJ/cm2 per second for UVA (µW = 10−6 J/s). The experiments were performed in triplicates. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 could effectively be inactivated by UVC irradiation, even at high viral titers, whereas UVA-irradiation was much less effective. These data are in line with previous reports where other coronaviruses eg, SARS-CoV-1 were shown to be susceptible to UVC irradiation.5, 6, 7 Viral stocks with titers of 1 × 106 TCID50/mL of SARS-CoV-1 could be almost completely inactivated after 6 minutes of UVC-irradiation, corresponding to a UVC dose of 1446 mJ/cm2. In our study, the emitted dose required for a complete inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 was 1048 mJ/cm2 after 9 minutes of exposure. A similar dose of 1 J/cm2 was also required to inactivate a viral load of 1 * 106 TCID50 H1N1 influenza virus. UV light disinfection is chemical free and thus a suitable method for applying in healthcare facilities to disinfect healthcare equipment. Most recently, a protocol for the disinfection of personal protective equipment including filtering face pieces from health care workers described the potential use of ultraviolet light to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Taken together, we demonstrated that UV irradiation is a highly effective method to inactivate the new corona virus SARS-CoV-2, even at the higher viral load levels that are found in research laboratories eg, in cell-culture supernatants or in diagnostic material taken from the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2, even at high viral titers, could be inactivated rapidly by UVC irradiation, revealing that this method is reliable not only for disinfection purposes in health care facilities but also for preparing inactivated SARS-CoV-2 material for research.
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Ultraviolet C (UVC) Light-Emitting Device for Disinfection of High Touch Surfaces in Hospital Critical Areas.

Authors:  Beatrice Casini; Benedetta Tuvo; Maria Luisa Cristina; Anna Maria Spagnolo; Michele Totaro; Angelo Baggiani; Gaetano Pierpaolo Privitera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Inactivation of the coronavirus that induces severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS-CoV.

Authors:  Miriam E R Darnell; Kanta Subbarao; Stephen M Feinstone; Deborah R Taylor
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.014

5.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Ruiyun Li; Sen Pei; Bin Chen; Yimeng Song; Tao Zhang; Wan Yang; Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  91 in total

1.  Bacteriophages as Surrogate Marker for Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by Ultraviolet Radiation to Prevent COVID-19 Transmission.

Authors:  Rathor Nisha; Chaudhry Rama
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 2.  Phototherapy and optical waveguides for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  Dingbowen Wang; Michelle Laurel Kuzma; Xinyu Tan; Tong-Chuan He; Cheng Dong; Zhiwen Liu; Jian Yang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Healthcare Workers in Germany: A Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Johannes Korth; Benjamin Wilde; Sebastian Dolff; Jasmin Frisch; Michael Jahn; Adalbert Krawczyk; Mirko Trilling; Leonie Schipper; Sebastian Cordes; Birgit Ross; Monika Lindemann; Andreas Kribben; Ulf Dittmer; Oliver Witzke; Anke Herrmann; Olympia Evdoxia Anastasiou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Chiappa; B Frascella; G P Vigezzi; M Moro; L Diamanti; L Gentile; P Lago; N Clementi; C Signorelli; N Mancini; A Odone
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Effectiveness of solar water disinfection in the era of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic for contaminated water/wastewater treatment considering UV effect and temperature.

Authors:  Seyed Masoud Parsa; Saba Momeni; Ahmadreza Hemmat; Masoud Afrand
Journal:  J Water Process Eng       Date:  2021-07-17

6.  COVID-19 and sunlight: Impact on SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality.

Authors:  Khan Sharun; Ruchi Tiwari; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-30

7.  UVC disinfects SARS-CoV-2 by induction of viral genome damage without apparent effects on viral morphology and proteins.

Authors:  Chieh-Wen Lo; Ryosuke Matsuura; Kazuki Iimura; Satoshi Wada; Atsushi Shinjo; Yoshimi Benno; Masaru Nakagawa; Masami Takei; Yoko Aida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Toward a Test Protocol for Surface Decontamination Using a Mobile Whole-room UVGI Device.

Authors:  Richard L Vincent; Stephen N Rudnick; James J McDevitt; Frances R Wallach
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 9.  The viability of SARS-CoV-2 on solid surfaces.

Authors:  Mohsen Hosseini; Saeed Behzadinasab; Zachary Benmamoun; William A Ducker
Journal:  Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.448

10.  Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 isolates from lineages B.1.1.7 (Alpha), P.1 (Gamma) and B.1.110 by heating and UV irradiation.

Authors:  S Ulloa; C Bravo; E Ramirez; R Fasce; J Fernandez
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.