Literature DB >> 32762269

Optimising the use of telemedicine in a kidney transplant programme during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Anju Yadav1, Kristi Caldararo1, Pooja Singh1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Coronavirus disease; Telemedicine; ehealth; pandemic; telehealth; transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32762269      PMCID: PMC9272037          DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20942632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.344


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought forth significant challenges in health-care delivery. The need to care for immunocompromised transplant patients in the safety of their homes while observing social distancing became imminent, as highlighted by Smith et al.[1] Due diligence and thoughtful processes were warranted to prevent unwanted exposure in this high-risk population with multiple comorbid conditions. Telemedicine delivered through a HIPAA-compliant platform is an innovative care delivery model that brings accessible and personable health care to patients’ home.[2,3] In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our kidney transplant programme rapidly adjusted workflows to convert 98% of transplant clinics into telemedicine sessions successfully. As per institutional guidance, we identified super users who ensured patients were ‘telemedicine ready’ by providing real-time technical assistance and test sessions prior to appointments. Today, more than 80% of adults in this country own smartphones, as reported by the Pew Research Center.[4] The ability to access telemedicine platforms through simple mobile applications increased patient participation by removing technological barriers and enabled seamless virtual patient and provider interaction. This rapid deployment of resources resulted in a dramatic institution-wide increase from 50 telemedicine visits a day to more than 3000 visits a day. Our institution transitioned most visits from ambulatory to telemedicine platform starting March 16th, 2020. As of June 1st, 2020, spaced out ambulatory visits have been resumed to facilitate social distancing and sanitization protocols which rigorously observed during patient encounters. Including our satellite nephrology and surgical sites average of 400 FTF transplant clinic visits per month between June 2019- March 16th, 2020 (including living kidney donor/ kidney recipient evaluations and post-transplant clinics). During this same time telehealth visits < 5 per month (these were mostly living kidney donor evaluation and post- transplant clinics) at these sites. In contrast, during COVID -19 pandemic (between March 16th to June 17th, 2020) our telehealth visit volume is about 250/ month. We adopted an ‘agile listing model’ for pre-transplant evaluations. This entailed virtual education and consenting followed by history taking and medication reconciliation by the transplant coordinator. From there, a telemedicine physician evaluation was conducted (including a telemedicine physical examination; Table 1) followed by evaluations by a social worker, dietician and financial coordinator over a secure videoconferencing platform. This model, as expected, has increased our inactive status 7 listings from 30% to 33% in just six weeks. This model will ensure that the ‘restart’ process is smooth, with only the need for in-person physical examinations for subsequent transition to active listing. The kidney transplant programme is also orchestrating at-home phlebotomy for waitlisted and post-transplant patients. Additionally, we have utilised enterprise-wide infusion centres for fluids, electrolytes, transfusions and haematopoietic growth-stimulating factor administration needs during this pandemic while observing strict sanitisation, universal masking and physical-distancing guidelines.
Table 1.

The art of observation: physical examination tips on telemedicine.

• Vitals signs: self-reported or observed on camera via a BP monitor, weight, temperature.
• General: distressed, sick, healthy appearing, flushed, observe gait.
• Head, eyes, neck and throat exam: normocephalic, atraumatic. Camera-lit nasopharyngeal examination, assess for oral ulcers, plaques, thrush. Check for equal and reactive pupils and external ocular movements.
• Lung exam: respiratory rate, effort of breathing, intercostal retractions, use of accessory muscles, nasal flaring, paradoxical breathing, wheezing with breathing, coughing.
• Cardiac exam: BP monitor pulse check or, if available. ‘smart watch’ for pulse, rhythm.
• Abdominal exam: distension, assess surgical incision for bruising, drainage and integrity. Assess peritoneal catheter site. Look for umbilical or ventral hernia. Patient- or family-assisted palpation for tender points.
• Extremities: colour, ulcers, patient-assisted examination of arteriovenous access (observed pulsations and self-reported thrill), evaluation of pedal oedema with patient or family’s help. Ask to remove shoes and socks to check feet and nail hygiene.
• Musculoskeletal: assess for range of motion or joint swelling.
• Skin exam: check for pallor, icterus, cyanosis, plethora. Assess for rash characteristics such as macular, papular, vesicular or nodular. Pictures can be sent on HIPPA-compliant portal.
• Neurological: alert, awake, orientation. Assess for tremors.
• Psychological exam: mood, behaviour, attention span, agitation, demeanour.

BP: blood pressure.

The art of observation: physical examination tips on telemedicine. BP: blood pressure. We have used telemedicine for potential live donors since 2016, with >60% telemedicine donor evaluations resulting in living kidney donation.[5] To provide a complete virtual work-up for donors, web links for educational videos are sent, followed by phone calls with the independent living donor advocate and the nurse coordinator to review the evaluation consent. Then, a telemedicine evaluation is completed by the transplant nephrologist and surgeon. A prerequisite step in this process includes evaluation by a primary physician locally. Additional members of the living donor team complete their evaluations via a secure audiovisual platform. A provisional candidacy decision is made at our multidisciplinary meeting. Potential donors only have to travel to the transplant centre once, about 10 days prior to the provisional donation date, to meet with various members of the team in person and to complete final testing, including imaging studies. This rapid virtual work-up has helped to make this process more financially feasible for donors by saving on travel, lodging and childcare expenses. A primary drive for telemedicine is the payment reform guidelines that were urgently put together under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act which granted some leniency towards licensures and telemedicine reimbursements. Becker’s Hospital Review reported Medicare telemedicine visits increased from 100,000 a week to 300,000 a week as of 28 March 2020, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrator called telemedicine a ‘clear example of untapped innovation’.[6] This pandemic was an unfortunate yet effective catalyst to address two major telemedicine roadblocks: consumer willingness to try new care delivery models and insurance coverage. Telemedicine allowed us to connect safely with our patients during their most vulnerable time and ensured that contact with them was uninterrupted. Across the nation, conversations have begun regarding the ‘second health-care crisis’ that we can expect post COVID-19. This will be a result of health care that was not delivered because of cancelled surgical cases, closed preventative health clinics and the avoidance of health-care institutions by patients unless necessary. As we collectively navigate this ‘new normal’, we expect patients to be hesitant when coming in for ambulatory visits, as the potential risk of contracting COVID-19 still looms. A hybrid model of telemedicine and ambulatory visits will enable us to provide the best health care, not only to transplant patients but to all consumers of the health-care delivery system during these unprecedented times.
  2 in total

1.  Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19.

Authors:  Judd E Hollander; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Anthony C Smith; Emma Thomas; Centaine L Snoswell; Helen Haydon; Ateev Mehrotra; Jane Clemensen; Liam J Caffery
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.184

  2 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Scope of Telemedicine in Kidney Transplantation: Access and Outreach Services.

Authors:  Fawaz Al Ammary; Beatrice P Concepcion; Anju Yadav
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.620

2.  Remote intervention engagement and outcomes in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children consortium multisite trial.

Authors:  Sarah Duncan-Park; Claire Dunphy; Jacqueline Becker; Christine D'Urso; Rachel Annunziato; Joshua Blatter; Carol Conrad; Samuel B Goldfarb; Don Hayes; Ernestina Melicoff; Marc Schecter; Gary Visner; Brian Armstrong; Hyunsook Chin; Karen Kesler; Nikki M Williams; Jonah N Odim; Stuart C Sweet; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Eyal Shemesh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  IMPact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the moRTAlity of kidney transplant recipients and candidates in a French Nationwide registry sTudy (IMPORTANT).

Authors:  Olivier Thaunat; Camille Legeai; Dany Anglicheau; Lionel Couzi; Gilles Blancho; Marc Hazzan; Myriam Pastural; Emilie Savoye; Florian Bayer; Emmanuel Morelon; Yann Le Meur; Olivier Bastien; Sophie Caillard
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Overview of Technologies Implemented During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Asmaa Hassan; Israa Abuelezz; Arfan Ahmed; Mahmood Saleh Alzubaidi; Uzair Shah; Dari Alhuwail; Anna Giannicchi; Mowafa Househ
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Acceleration of mobile health for monitoring post-transplant in the COVID-19 era: Applications for pediatric settings.

Authors:  Bianca R Campagna; Rebecca Tutino; Kristina Stevanovic; Julia Flood; Gali Halevi; Eyal Shemesh; Rachel A Annunziato
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 6.  Telehealth Use by Living Kidney Donor Transplant Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: a Practical Approach.

Authors:  Anju Yadav; Pooja Singh
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2021-11-17

7.  Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers.

Authors:  Fawaz Al Ammary; Jennifer D Motter; Hannah C Sung; Krista L Lentine; Asif Sharfuddin; Vineeta Kumar; Anju Yadav; Mona D Doshi; Sarthak Virmani; Beatrice P Concepcion; Terry Grace; Carolyn N Sidoti; Muhammad Yahya Jan; Abimereki D Muzaale; Joshua Wolf
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 9.369

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.