Literature DB >> 32761547

Examining the relationship between the demand-control model and incident myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure in a representative sample of the employed women and men in Ontario, Canada, over a 15-year period.

Peter Smith1,2,3, Mahee Gilbert-Ouimet4,5, Chantal Brisson5,6, Richard H Glazier7,8,9,10, Cameron A Mustard11,12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between job strain and incident myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure in a representative population of men and women in Ontario, Canada, over a 15-year period.
METHODS: A total of 14,508 respondents having provided responses to either the 2000/2001, 2002, or 2003 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were aged 35 and older at the time and working. After removing respondents with pre-existing heart disease and missing data, our sample totaled 13,291 respondents. Responses were linked to administrative health care and hospitalization data to capture incident cases of myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure up to March 31, 2017. Job control and psychological demands were assessed using 5 items and 2 items respectively. A series of time-to-event regression models were run, adjusting sequentially for socio-demographic variables and health, other psychosocial work exposures, and health behaviours and body mass index.
RESULTS: Over the study period, there were 199,583 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up: 15 years, 233 days). Higher incidence rates were observed for men (6.69 per 100 persons) than for women (2.77 per 100 persons). No clear relationship was observed for demand-control exposures and incidence of myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure in either men or women. After adjustment for socio-demographic factors, pre-existing health conditions, and other psychosocial exposures, the hazard ratio for high strain exposure (compared with low strain exposure) was 0.92 (0.46-1.84) for women and 0.75 (0.44-1.27) for men.
CONCLUSION: In this large prospective cohort in Canada, we observed no relationship between components of the demand-control model and incident myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure over a 15-year period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart diseases; Occupational stress; Prospective studies; Workplace

Year:  2020        PMID: 32761547      PMCID: PMC7910397          DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00378-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  28 in total

1.  Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2003-06

2.  A follow-up study of job strain and heart disease among males in the NHANES1 population.

Authors:  K Steenland; J Johnson; S Nowlin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Exposure to Work and Nonwork Stressors and the Development of Heart Disease Among Canadian Workers Aged 40 Years and Older: A 16-year Follow-up Study (1994 to 2010).

Authors:  Alain Marchand; Marie-Eve Blanc; Nancy Beauregard
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Psychosocial work stressors and risk of all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yamna Taouk; Matthew J Spittal; Anthony D LaMontagne; Allison J Milner
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Job strain and risk of acute recurrent coronary heart disease events.

Authors:  Corine Aboa-Eboulé; Chantal Brisson; Elizabeth Maunsell; Benoît Mâsse; Renée Bourbonnais; Michel Vézina; Alain Milot; Pierre Théroux; Gilles R Dagenais
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The psychosocial work environment and incident diabetes in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  P M Smith; R H Glazier; H Lu; C A Mustard
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.611

7.  Outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Canada.

Authors:  Jack V Tu; Peter C Austin; Woganee A Filate; Helen L Johansen; Susan E Brien; Louise Pilote; David A Alter
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  Association Between Work-Related Stress and Coronary Heart Disease: A Review of Prospective Studies Through the Job Strain, Effort-Reward Balance, and Organizational Justice Models.

Authors:  Jaskanwal D Sara; Megha Prasad; Mackram F Eleid; Ming Zhang; R Jay Widmer; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Association between Work-Related Stress and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Hua Sui; Nijing Sun; Libin Zhan; Xiaoguang Lu; Tuo Chen; Xinyong Mao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.