| Literature DB >> 32760589 |
Shaojun Lyu1, Jianwei Zhang1, Jianquan Nie2, Cuihan Li3, Tianming Gao1, Wen Yuan3, Zaihao Chen3, Jing Ma4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The newly compiled Bafa Wubu of Tai Chi (Eight Methods and Five Footworks) is a fitness routine that has been developed in accordance with the appeal of the General Administration of Sport of China and promoted both in China and abroad. This paper aims to compare the differences in energy consumption and related parameters between the two types of Tai Chi.Entities:
Keywords: 24 form simplified tai chi; Bafa Wubu of tai chi; Energy metabolism; Exercise intensity; Oxygen uptake
Year: 2020 PMID: 32760589 PMCID: PMC7391605 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-020-00192-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil ISSN: 2052-1847
Fig. 1Flow diagram of study design
Maximal exercise capacity of participants
| n | VO2max/kg (ml/kg/min) | METsmax (METs) | HRmax (bpm) | VO2/HRmax (ml) | RQmax | RPEmax |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 40.6 ± 5.86 | 12.2 ± 2.11 | 185 ± 10.4 | 16.2 ± 1.31 | 1.23 ± 0.154 | 18.2 ± 0.07 |
Data presented are Mean SD. METsmax the maximal metabolic equivalent, HRmax the maximal heart rate, VO/HRmax the maximal pulse oxygen, RQmax the maximal respiratory quotient, RPEmax the maximal rate of perceived exertion
Basic characteristics of participants in the quiet state before the test
| n | Before Bafa Wubu of Tai Chi | Before 24 form simplified Tai Chi | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic Pressure | 60 | 111.8 ± 6.18 | 113.2 ± 6.00 | −0.492 | 0.142 |
| Diastolic Pressure | 60 | 65.1 ± 7.01 | 66.2 ± 6.61 | −0.574 | 0.568 |
| Oxygen Saturation | 60 | 96.9 ± 1.03 | 97.1 ± 1.29 | −1.202 | 0.235 |
| VO2/kg | 60 | 7.1 ± 2.73 | 7.4 ± 2.89 | −1.200 | 0.335 |
| METs | 60 | 1.1 ± 0.17 | 1.1 ± 0.22 | 0.440 | 0.662 |
| HR | 60 | 78.6 ± 5.43 | 78.1 ± 3.51 | 0.653 | 0.516 |
| VO2/HR | 60 | 5.7 ± 2.53 | 5.6 ± 2.11 | 0.114 | 0.910 |
| RQ | 60 | 0.7 ± 0.08 | 0.7 ± 0.10 | 0.209 | 0.835 |
Data presented are Mean SD. METs, metabolic equivalent; HR, heart rate; VO2/HR, oxygen pulse; RQ, respiratory quotient
Comparisons of Bafa Wubu of Tai Chi vs. 24 form simplified Tai Chi in physiologic indices
| n | The newly compiled Bafa Wubu of Tai Chi | 24 form simplified Tai Chi | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average VO2/kg | 60 | 10.8 ± 2.52 | 12.9 ± 2.59 | −4.877 | 0.000 |
| Highest VO2/kg | 60 | 19.3 ± 6.03 | 24.1 ± 7.50 | −4.030 | 0.000 |
| Average HR | 60 | 104.1 ± 11.41 | 105.7 ± 9.68 | −0.393 | 0.696 |
| HRR | 60 | 1.47 ± 0.41 | 1.27 ± 0.45 | 2.775 | 0.008 |
| Highest VO2/HR | 60 | 11.1 ± 0.99 | 13.9 ± 0.93 | −14.193 | 0.000 |
| Highest RQ | 60 | 1.0 ± 0.06 | 0.9 ± 0.09 | 0.466 | 0.643 |
| Systolic Pressure Obtained Immediately after Exercise | 60 | 134.5 ± 8.66 | 136.2 ± 4.94 | −1.276 | 0.207 |
| Diastolic Pressure Obtained Immediately after Exercise | 60 | 69.6 ± 6.41 | 69.2 ± 7.90 | −0.095 | 0.925 |
| Oxygen saturation Obtained Immediately after Exercise | 60 | 97.1 ± 1.30 | 97.2 ± 1.21 | −0.406 | 0.686 |
Data presented are Mean SD. HR heart rate, HRR heart rate recovery, VO/HR oxygen pulse, RQ respiratory quotient
Comparison of Bafa Wubu of Tai Chi vs. 24 Form Simplified Tai Chi in Tai Chi intensity
| n | The newly compiled Bafa Wubu of Tai Chi | 24 form simplified Tai Chi | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tai Chi intensity | 60 | 0.50 ± 0.117 | 0.64 ± 0.125 | −10.652 | 0.000 |
| Average METs | 60 | 2.3 ± 0.16 | 3.2 ± 0.14 | −29.742 | 0.000 |
| Average RPE | 60 | 10.7 ± 0.70 | 11.3 ± 0.62 | −4.968 | 0.000 |
Data presented are Mean SD. METs metabolic equivalent, RPE rate of perceived exertion