| Literature DB >> 32760431 |
Tihana Kurtović1, Marija Brgles1, Maja Lang Balija1, Stephanie Steinberger2, Dora Sviben1, Martina Marchetti-Deschmann2, Beata Halassy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antivenoms are the only validated treatment against snakebite envenoming. Numerous drawbacks pertaining to their availability, safety and efficacy are becoming increasingly evident due to low sustainability of current productions. Technological innovation of procedures generating therapeutics of higher purity and better physicochemical characteristics at acceptable cost is necessary. The objective was to develop at laboratory scale a compact, feasible and economically viable platform for preparation of equine F(ab')2 antivenom against Vipera ammodytes ammodytes venom and to support it with efficiency data, to enable estimation of the process cost-effectiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Antivenom downstream processing; F(ab')2 immunotherapy; Hyperimmune plasma; Ion-exchange chromatography; Mass spectrometry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32760431 PMCID: PMC7384442 DOI: 10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2020-0025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis ISSN: 1678-9180
Figure 1.Optimization of F(ab')2 preparation. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of samples (20 μg) obtained by simultaneous caprylic acid precipitation and pepsin digestion of HHP at 37 or 23 °C. Lane 1, HHP; Lane 2, sample obtained at 37 °C with 1.5 h-long incubation; Lane 3, molecular weight standards; lanes 4-8, samples obtained at 23 °C with duration of incubation as indicated. Staining was performed with CBB R250. (B) Time-course of SEC-determined yields and purities of F(ab')2 preparations obtained by precipitation and digestion co-performance at 23 °C following diafiltration on a 50 kDa membrane. Results are given as mean +/- standard error. (C) Optimization of precipitation and digestion co-performance step with respect to the pepsin-to-IgG ratio and temperature studied according to full factorial experimental design. Mean yield (ο) of active drug obtained post-diafiltrationally at higher and lower level of each experimental factor (X1 - pepsin-to-IgG ratio, X2 - temperature) in comparison to mean value (full line) and 95% confidence interval (dashed lines) from the overall set of experiments. (D) Pareto plot of effect estimates. The absolute value of the main effect for each factor (|E |) is presented in horizontal columns. The critical effect values for significance level of α = 0.01 is marked by a vertical line.
Figure 2.The assessment of purification steps by size-exclusion chromatography. The analysis was performed on a TSK-Gel G3000SWXL column (7.8 × 300 mm) with 0.1 M phosphate-sulfate running buffer, pH 6.6, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min-1. The sample (2 mg mL-1) was loaded to the column in a volume of 50 μL per run. (A) Heat-treated plasma. (B) F(ab')2 fraction obtained by simultaneous 2% caprylic acid (V/V) precipitation and pepsin digestion before (crude IgG) and (C) after diafiltration using a 50 kDa membrane (pure IgG). (D) Ultrapure F(ab')2 preparation - flow-through fraction from anion-exchange chromatography performed at pH 5.0. Detection: UV at 280 nm.
Figure 3.Gel electrophoresis of representative samples from purification process on 4-12% gel. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of HHP (40 μg) and F(ab')2 fractions (20 μg) under non-reducing conditions with CBB R250 staining. Lane 1, molecular weight standards; Lane 2, HHP; Lane 3, F(ab')2 fraction obtained by simultaneous 2% caprylic acid (V/V) precipitation and pepsin digestion (crude F(ab')2); Lane 4, F(ab')2 fraction after diafiltration (pure F(ab')2); lanes 5 and 6, F(ab')2 preparation using CIM QA chromatography (ultrapure F(ab')2). (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of F(ab')2 fractions (20 μg) under non-reducing conditions with silver staining. Lanes 1-4 correspond to lanes 3-6 from (A). "Negatively" silver-stained bands corresponding to pepsin are denoted by arrow. (C) 2D gel electrophoresis of the final product. In the first dimension F(ab')2 (350 μg) was focused using IPG strip under denaturing conditions (linear pH 3-10). Prior second dimension IPG strip was reduced, alkylated and loaded to a 4-12% gel. Proteins were detected with CBB R250 and identified by MS/MS analysis (LC = light chain, HC = heavy chain). Molecular mass markers are on the left side.
Purities and yields of the intermediates and the final product obtained by developed downstream processing protocol. Two different plasma pools (HHP1 and HHP2) were used. IgG purities in HHPs, before and after thermal treatment, are expressed as means from n measurements +/- 95% confidence interval. IgG yields in thermally treated HHPs, as well as F(ab')2 purities and yields, are given as means from n independent process performances +/- 95% confidence interval.
| Processing step | Product | IgG/F(ab')2 purity (%) | IgG/F(ab')2 yield (%)* | Overall IgG/F(ab')2 yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHP1 | 47.8 ± 2.9 ( | n.a. | n.a. | |
| HHP2 | 41.5 ± 2.8 ( | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Heat denaturation | Thermally treated HHP1 | 46.9 ± 4.1 ( | 91.6 ± 2.4 ( | 91.6 ± 2.4 ( |
| Thermally treated HHP2 | 44.0 ± 3.2 ( | |||
| Precipitation and digestion | Crude F(ab')2 | 60.4 ± 1.7 ( | 85.2 ± 6.1 ( | 76.8 ± 5.5 ( |
| Diafiltration | Pure F(ab')2 | 86.7 ± 6.4 ( | 95.9 ± 6.1 ( | 73.6 ± 6.1 ( |
| Anion-exchange HPLC | Ultrapure F(ab')2 | 97.3 ± 4.0 ( | 100.9 ± 4.3 ( | 74.3 ± 5.9 ( |
*Yield in relation to the preceding processing step
In vivo neutralization potencies of HHP and F(ab')2 with specific activities. Purification factors obtained through manufacturing procedure are indicated. Results are expressed as means from n independently performed experiments +/- standard deviation.
| Plasma | Ultrapure F(ab')2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| [LD50 mL-1] | 44.0 ± 15.9 ( | 94.1 ± 5.9 ( |
|
| [mg mL-1] | 27.3 ± 2.3 ( | 29.3 ± 0.2 (43.7 ± 0.3)*
( |
| Specific activity of active drugc | [LD50 mg-1] | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
|
| [mg mL-1] | 58.2 ± 4.4 ( | 30.1 ± 0.2 ( |
| Specific activity of samplee | [LD50 mg-1] | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 3.1 ± 0.2 |
| Purification factorf | [× ] | 1.0 | 3.9 |
Lethal toxicity neutralization potency. bIgG or F(ab')2 mass concentration. cSpecific activity of active drug in the sample calculated as ratio of R to γ(IgG) or γ(F(ab')2), respectively. dTotal protein mass concentration. eSpecific activity of the sample calculated as ratio of R to γ(protein). fPurification factor calculated as ratio of specific activities of F(ab')2 product and HHP.
*Assumption of molecular weight reduction of the active drug due to Fc removal was considered