Literature DB >> 32760169

Impact of the Coronavirus Infection in Pregnancy: A Preliminary Study of 141 Patients.

Arun Harishchandra Nayak1, Deepali Swapnil Kapote1, Michelle Fonseca1, Niranjan Chavan2, Rahul Mayekar2, Meenal Sarmalkar2, Amarjeet Bawa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is the most challenging health crisis that we are facing today. Against the backdrop of this pandemic, it becomes imperative to study the effects of this infection on pregnancy and its outcome. Hence, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 infection on the maternal morbidity and mortality, the course of labour as well as the neonatal outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 977 pregnant women were included in the study, from 1st April to 15th May 2020 at a tertiary care hospital. There were 141 women who tested COVID positive and remaining 836 patients were included in the COVID negative group. Findings were compared in both the groups.
RESULTS: The incidence of COVID positive pregnant women was found to be 14.43%. More patients delivered by LSCS in the COVID positive and the COVID negative group (50%) as compared to COVID negative group (47%), (p > 0.05). Low APGAR score (0-3) was observed in 2(1.52%) neonates of COVID positive mothers and in 15 (1.91%) neonates of COVID negative mothers. Overall most of the babies were healthy. Out of all babies tested, 3 were detected positive initially which were retested on day 5 and were found to be negative.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant effect of COVID infection on maternal and foetal outcome in pregnancy and there is no evidence of vertical transmission of the COVID-19 infection but long-term follow-up of these babies is recommended. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APGAR; COVID-19; Morbidity; Mortality; Neonate; Pandemic; Pregnancy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32760169      PMCID: PMC7340730          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01335-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


Introduction

The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) is a global public health emergency. The first case of coronavirus infection was identified in Wuhan, Hubei province of China and was notified to the WHO on 31st December 2019. By 30th of January 2020, the coronavirus disease was declared as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) [1]. It did not take long for the COVID-19 to establish its roots in India as the first case was confirmed on 30th January [2]. As of 16th May 2020, the total number of cases in India was 85,940 with 2753 deaths reported by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare [3]. The mode of transmission is by droplets which can occur when the patient sneezes or coughs. The incubation period varies from 2 days to 2 weeks following exposure to the virus [4]. An analysis of 181 confirmed COVID-19 cases outside Wuhan, China, found the mean incubation period to be 5.1 days and that 97.5% of the individuals who developed symptoms did so within 11.5 days of infection [5]. The period from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms to death ranged from 6 to 41 days with a median of 14 days with a case fatality rate of 2.3% [6, 7]. The patient can present with an array of symptoms, most commonly presenting with complaints of cold, cough, fever, malaise, headache, itching or watering in the eyes [8]. However, patients may also present with gradual worsening of respiratory discomfort or multiorgan failure. The diagnosis of current infection relies on tests to detect the presence of virus in various body fluids. The standard test being done presently is detection of the viral RNA by RT-PCR (Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction) from the nasopharyngeal mucosa as recommended by the ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research). Antibody tests on blood are used to confirm past infection and presumed immunity to repeat infection, although effectiveness of such tests is not yet known [9]. Coronavirus disease has thrown the entire medical fraternity into a world of uncertainty and clinical dilemma in the absence of preexisting guidelines or protocols. In the backdrop of this pandemic, it thus becomes imperative to study the effects of the infection on pregnancy. This is probably the first study in India to assess the effects of COVID-19 infection on the maternal morbidity and mortality as well as the effects on newborn in the 141 pregnant women diagnosed with COVID infection in the early phase of the pandemic.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective observational analytical study done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Tertiary Care Hospital attached to a Medical College, located in Central Mumbai, draining patients from the entire Mumbai Metropolitan region and referrals from far away places like Raigad, Ratnagiri districts too. The hospital is located near a red zone of COVID infection and conducts deliveries of approximately 10,000 patients every year. The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval was taken for the study. A total of 977 patients were included in the study, who were in labour or who had an abortion or an ectopic pregnancy, from 1st April to 15th May 2020. Out of which 141 women tested COVID positive and 836 women were COVID negative. Aims and Objectives of the Study were to assess the maternal morbidity and mortality due to covid-19 infection in the pregnant patients and to assess the effects of covid-19 infection on the newborn along with assessment of association of comorbidities with worsening of outcome in pregnant woman. Details about the patients like age, parity, gestational age, address, history of contact, any comorbid conditions, mode of delivery/outcome, baby details, APGAR score and treatment given were noted. The testing of all the pregnant women who came to the labour room was done as per the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) guidelines AMC/WS/5970/OD/VIP issued in April 2020, in which testing was advised to all pregnant patients and ICMR guidelines which stated that pregnant women residing in containment zones or from hotspot district presenting in labour or likely to deliver in next 5 days should be tested even if asymptomatic. Most of our patients were from containment zones or hotspot areas of the city. The swabs were collected after wearing complete PPE (Personal protective equipment) and were transferred in a VTM (viral transport medium) and sent to the microbiology department for testing. All the patients were advised to wear a mask and all the health care workers were using complete PPE during their shifts in the labour ward. To reduce the risk of transmission, we carried out several measures including creating awareness about hand hygiene and usage of masks in all patients, maintaining a distance between beds and a strict and correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among the health care workers. Separate rooms for donning and doffing were assigned in the labour ward complex. Cleaning and disinfection of the labour room and labour OT was done on regular and frequent intervals. For COVID positive patients, chest X-ray was done and they were started on oral or parenteral antibiotics along with tablet Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment in the dose of 400 mg BID on first day and later 200 mg BID for 4 days. Symptomatic patients requiring oxygen or ventilatory support were managed in a separate ward in consultation with the physician. Asymptomatic positive patients were discharged or transferred to COVID care centre (CCC) on day 5. Neonatal swabs were sent within 24 h and rooming-in was recommended. Direct breastfeeding was encouraged in these patients. Mothers were instructed to wear a medical mask, when they were near their baby and perform hand hygiene before close contact with the baby. All the maternal and neonatal parameters were analysed using descriptive statistics i.e. percentages and proportions were calculated. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables in COVID positive and negative groups. p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 977 pregnant women were included in the study period of 45 days, from 1st April to 15th May 2020. Of these, there were 141 women who tested COVID positive and the remaining 836 patients were COVID negative. Thus giving the incidence of COVID infection in pregnancy as 14.43%. Among COVID positive cases, only 8 patients gave a history of contact with patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection and 133 were community acquired cases.

Demographic Profile

Table 1 shows Demographic profile of the patients in COVID positive and negative group. Majority of the patients were found in the age group of 21–25 years. More number of women in our study were multigravida and had gestational age of ≥ 37 weeks.
Table 1

Demographic Profile of the patients (n = 977)

ParametersCOVID positiveCOVID negativep value
Age group (years)
  < 208 (5.67%)104 (12.44%)> 0.05
 21–2564 (45.39%)361 (43.18%)
 26–3057 (40.42%)300 (35.88%)
  > 3012 (8.51%)71 (8.49%)
Parity
 Primigravida55 (39%)291 (34.80%)> 0.05
 Multigravida84 (59.57%)534 (63.87%)
 Grand multipara2 (1.41%)11 (1.31%)
Gestational age (in weeks)
  ≥ 37103 (73.04%)597 (71.41%)> 0.05
 34.1–36.623 (16.31%)143 (17.10%)
  < 3415 (10.63%)96 (11.48%)
Total141836
Demographic Profile of the patients (n = 977)

Associated Comorbidities

Table 2 shows associated comorbidities in both groups. As many as 27 (19.14%) COVID positive patients and 161 (19.25%) women in COVID negative group had comorbidities. Anaemia, pregnancy-induced hypertension and eclampsia were the most common comorbidities in both the groups.
Table 2

Associated Comorbidities

ParametersCOVID positiveCOVID negativep value
DM/GDM4 (2.83%)24 (2.87%)> 0.05
HTN/PIH/Eclampsia7 (4.96%)45 (5.38%)
TB/Asthma/LRTI2 (1.41%)11 (1.31%)
Hypothyroidism5 (3.54%)17 (2.03%)
Anaemia5 (3.54%)30 (3.58%)
Thalassemia1 (0.70%)1 (0.11%)
HIV/HBSAG/HCV1 (0.70%)13 (1.55%)
Others2 (1.41%)20 (2.39%)
Total27 (19.14%)161 (19.25%)

DM diabetes mellitus, GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, HTN hypertension, PIH pregnancy induced hypertension, TB tuberculosis, LRTI lower respiratory tract infections, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HBSAG hepatitis B, HCV hepatitis C

Associated Comorbidities DM diabetes mellitus, GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, HTN hypertension, PIH pregnancy induced hypertension, TB tuberculosis, LRTI lower respiratory tract infections, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HBSAG hepatitis B, HCV hepatitis C

Mode of Delivery

Table 3 shows that the number of patients who were delivered by LSCS in COVID positive group (50%) was higher as compared to COVID negative group (47%) but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, (p > 0.05). Chen et al. [10] reported a study with LSCS done for all patients. In our study LSCS was done for Obstetric indications only. Out of the total 141 patients in the COVID positive group, 134 patients delivered either by LSCS/vaginal delivery/Instrumental delivery, 6 had abortions and 1 had an ectopic pregnancy. Similarly in the COVID negative group, we had 800 post-delivery patients with 16 pairs of twin deliveries, 33 abortions and 3 ectopic pregnancies.
Table 3

Mode of delivery

OutcomeCOVID positiveCOVID negativep value
Vaginal delivery66 (49.25%)415 (51,87%)> 0.05
Instrumental1 (0.74%)9 (1.12%)> 0.05
LSCS67 (50%)376 (47%)> 0.05
Total134800
Mode of delivery

Maternal Complications

Table 4 shows incidence of maternal complications in both the groups. Most of our patients (97%) of them were asymptomatic or had mild symptoms like fever or cough not requiring any oxygen therapy. The rate of maternal death in COVID positive patients 3(2.12%) was slightly higher as compared to COVID negative pregnant women 8 (0.95%), (p > 0.05). We had 3 maternal deaths in COVID positive patients. First case was a Primigravida with 35 weeks of gestation with sepsis and hepatitis, other 2 patients were referred to us in moribund condition on day 2 of normal delivery with severe anaemia with pneumonia with cardiogenic shock with HELLP syndrome and other was a post LSCS patient with sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI). There were 8 maternal deaths in the COVID negative group.
Table 4

Maternal complications

ComplicationsCOVID positiveCOVID negativep value
Abortions6 (4.25%)33 (3.94%)> 0.05
Ectopic pregnancy1 (0.70%)3 (0.35%)> 0.05
APH and PPH3 (2.12%)17 (2.03%)> 0.05
Maternal deaths3 (2.12%)8 (0.95%)> 0.05
Total13 (9.21%)61 (7.29%)
Maternal complications

Neonatal Outcome

Table 5 shows APGAR score was normal (7–10) in most of the neonates in both the groups, (> 0.05). Low APGAR i.e. 0–3 was observed in 2 (1.52%) neonates of COVID positive mothers and in 15 (1.91%) neonates of COVID negative mothers. In both the groups, majority of neonates had birth weight between 2.5 and 2.9 kg, (< 0.05).
Table 5

Neonatal outcome

OutcomeCOVID positiveCOVID negativep value
APGAR score (at 0 min)
 7–10128 (97.7%)746 (95.03%)> 0.05
 4–61 (0.76%)24 (3.05%)< 0.05
 0–32 (1.52%)15 (1.91%)> 0.05
Weight at birth in kg
  > 338 (29.0%)206 (26.24%)> 0.05
 2.5–2.954 (41.22%)283 (36.05%)< 0.05
 2–2.425 (19.08%)168 (21.4%)> 0.05
 1.5–1.912 (9.11%)79 (10.06%)> 0.05
  < 1.52 (1.52%)49 (6.25%)< 0.05
Total131785
Neonatal outcome

Neonatal Complications

Table 6 shows that out of the 134 patients in the COVID positive group, 3(2.23%) had an IUFD while 31(3.79%) women had an IUFD in COVID negative group. Out of 24 babies of COVID positive mothers in NICU, 16 babies went to NICU due to low birth weight (LBW), 2 for low APGAR score, 6 babies due to various reasons like neonatal seizures, meconium aspiration syndrome and ABO incompatibility. Out of total 131 babies tested, only 3 babies were tested positive on first swab and all of them tested negative on day 5 (Fig. 1).
Table 6

Neonatal complications

ComplicationsCOVID positiveCOVID negativep value
IUFD3 (2.23%)31 (3.79%)< 0.05
Baby in NICU24 (17.91%)202 (24.75%)< 0.05
Total27 (20.14%)233 (28.55%)
Fig. 1

Most of the patients are referred to us for delivery due to various reasons. The demographic data of the residence of these patients was analysed and we noted that Zone 2 and Zone 5 which are high risk containment zones of Mumbai i.e. Dharavi, Chembur and Govandi areas contributed to the maximum number of Covid positive cases i.e. 50.35% and 34.04% respectively

Neonatal complications Most of the patients are referred to us for delivery due to various reasons. The demographic data of the residence of these patients was analysed and we noted that Zone 2 and Zone 5 which are high risk containment zones of Mumbai i.e. Dharavi, Chembur and Govandi areas contributed to the maximum number of Covid positive cases i.e. 50.35% and 34.04% respectively

Discussion

Viral pneumonia is believed to be the most common non-obstetric infectious disease during pregnancy associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality [11]. Atypical coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is highly infectious and is currently spreading rapidly across the world [12]. It has caused thousands of morbidities and mortalities worldwide since its emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019 [13]. Many studies have focused on infected patients from the general population; however, details of COVID-19 related pregnancy outcomes are scarce. Chen et al. [10] reported the maternal–neonatal outcomes and vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 pneumonia in pregnant women. Their study focused on pregnant women who only delivered babies by LSCS, and no case has been reported for normal vaginal delivery. There is a very limited data currently available on maternal outcomes in COVID-19 infection in pregnancy. However, as per the data from other viral illnesses such as influenza, SARS and MERS, pregnant women are more likely to develop viral pneumonitis, with higher morbidity and mortality [14]. The present study involved 977 deliveries, among these, 141 patients tested COVID positive with an incidence of 14.43%. Although the pregnant women with COVID-19 infection tended to present with mild respiratory symptoms, the risk of severe pneumonia during this period is high [10, 14, 15]. WHO report found that in these patients, the adverse pregnancy outcomes was high, especially among those with other associated diseases such as preeclampsia or other complications because respiratory syndromes may aggravate pulmonary oedema and decrease oxygen saturation [16]. In our study, patients had presented with a number of comorbidities or complications in their pregnancy such as anaemia, gestational DM (GDM), hypertension and other medical disorders in both the groups. Liu et al. [16] and Fan et al. [17] reported that most pregnant women acquired the infection in the third trimester of pregnancy. Similar findings were noted in our study. The emergence of a disease with respiratory implications in the third trimester of pregnancy is usually associated with a higher risk of LSCS, preterm births, low Apgar indexes, and low birth weight. In our study, out of 141 COVID positive cases, 134 women were post-delivery (vaginal delivery/LSCS) cases, 1 patient had ectopic pregnancy and six patients had abortions. Several studies have reported that most women underwent LSCS [10, 14, 15, 17, 18]. Recent literature tends to lean towards LSCS; however, much depends on woman’s comorbidities. In our study, more number of patients were delivered by LSCS in COVID positive group (50%) as compared to COVID negative group (47%) but difference was not statistically significant, (p > 0.05). LSCS was done for obstetric indications like non-progress of labour, foetal distress, etc. and not just because the pregnant woman had COVID 19 infection. Regarding the characteristics of the newborns, majority of neonates were born with a normal Apgar index (7–10) with average birth weight of (2.5–2.9 kg) in both the groups. Certain generalized viral infections, such as HIV are predisposed to intrapartum neonatal transmission [10, 19]. For COVID-19, data is limited. In one case series three neonates were born vaginally (one singleton, one set of twins) and throat swabs for PCR at day one of birth were negative for COVID-19 in all three cases [20]. Another COVID-19 positive patient had negative vaginal swab testing during delivery [18]. Many studies [10, 20] have suggested no increased risk of perinatal vertical transmission. Histopathological review of three placentas of confirmed COVID-19 positive patients following delivery by caesarean section showed no signs of villitis and chorioamnionitis, and all three placental samples were negative for COVID-19 RNA. These reports showed no evidence for intrauterine vertical transmission for COVID-19 in second or third trimester has been confirmed. These findings are in accordance with the findings of our study. The Neonatal mortality (IUFD) was found to be 3(2.23%) in COVID positive group and 31(3.79%) in COVID negative group. We had 3 maternal deaths in COVID positive patients. First case was a Primigravida with 35 weeks of gestation with sepsis and hepatitis, other 2 patients were referred to us in moribund condition on day 2 of normal delivery with severe anaemia with pneumonia with cardiogenic shock with HELLP syndrome and other was a post LSCS patient with sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI). There were 8 maternal deaths in COVID negative group, out of these 2 were due to direct causes like Postpartum haemorrhage and Antepartum haemorrhage. Other six maternal deaths were due to indirect causes.

Conclusion

Research on the effects of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is still in its initial stages. In the present study, we compared the outcomes of COVID-19 positive and negative pregnant women and their neonates. The results of the study suggested that there is no effect of COVID 19 infection on maternal and perinatal outcome. The majority of the women were discharged without any major complications and there was no evidence of vertical transmission of the COVID-19 infection. However, long-term follow-up of these babies to see any delayed effects is necessary. Our study was a small preliminary analysis of COVID positive pregnant women in the initial stage of the epidemic. As several pregnant women are getting infected all over the world, a clear picture will emerge in the coming days about the effect of COVID 19 infection on pregnancy, labour and the neonates.
  14 in total

1.  Perinatal Transmission of 2019 Coronavirus Disease-Associated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: Should We Worry?

Authors:  Cuifang Fan; Di Lei; Congcong Fang; Chunyan Li; Ming Wang; Yuling Liu; Yan Bao; Yanmei Sun; Jinfa Huang; Yuping Guo; Ying Yu; Suqing Wang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Jianming Tang; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Potential Maternal and Infant Outcomes from (Wuhan) Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Infecting Pregnant Women: Lessons from SARS, MERS, and Other Human Coronavirus Infections.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Ashley L Graham
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

5.  Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia.

Authors:  Huaping Zhu; Lin Wang; Chengzhi Fang; Sicong Peng; Lianhong Zhang; Guiping Chang; Shiwen Xia; Wenhao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2020-02

6.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Stephen A Lauer; Kyra H Grantz; Qifang Bi; Forrest K Jones; Qulu Zheng; Hannah R Meredith; Andrew S Azman; Nicholas G Reich; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Clinical and CT imaging features of the COVID-19 pneumonia: Focus on pregnant women and children.

Authors:  Huanhuan Liu; Fang Liu; Jinning Li; Tingting Zhang; Dengbin Wang; Weishun Lan
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 6.072

8.  Withdrawn: Clinical manifestations and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.

Authors:  Yangli Liu; Haihong Chen; Kejing Tang; Yubiao Guo
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study.

Authors:  Nan Yu; Wei Li; Qingling Kang; Zhi Xiong; Shaoshuai Wang; Xingguang Lin; Yanyan Liu; Juan Xiao; Haiyi Liu; Dongrui Deng; Suhua Chen; Wanjiang Zeng; Ling Feng; Jianli Wu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records.

Authors:  Huijun Chen; Juanjuan Guo; Chen Wang; Fan Luo; Xuechen Yu; Wei Zhang; Jiafu Li; Dongchi Zhao; Dan Xu; Qing Gong; Jing Liao; Huixia Yang; Wei Hou; Yuanzhen Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Outcome of Neonates Born to SARS-CoV-2 Positive Mothers in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Santosh K Panda; Alpana Mishra; Mona Pathak
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-08

2.  Impacts and effects of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy.

Authors:  Amala Sunder; Bessy Varghese; Basma Darwish; Noor Shaikho; Mooza Rashid
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  Giving birth under hospital visitor restrictions: Heightened acute stress in childbirth in COVID-19 positive women.

Authors:  Gus Mayopoulos; Tsachi Ein-Dor; Kevin Li; Sabrina Chan; Sharon Dekel
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2020-12-09

4.  COVID-19 positivity associated with traumatic stress response to childbirth and no visitors and infant separation in the hospital.

Authors:  Gus A Mayopoulos; Tsachi Ein-Dor; Kevin G Li; Sabrina J Chan; Sharon Dekel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  COVID-19 in pregnancy: the foetal perspective-a systematic review.

Authors:  Rajani Dube; Subhranshu Sekhar Kar
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-11-25

6.  Clinical manifestations and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeong Yee; Woorim Kim; Ji Min Han; Ha Young Yoon; Nari Lee; Kyung Eun Lee; Hye Sun Gwak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of data on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19: Clinical presentation, and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes based on COVID-19 severity.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Ali Ana; Jai K Das; Rehana A Salam; Zahra A Padhani; Omer Irfan; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.413

8.  Elective Cesarean Section in Obstetric COVID-19 Patients under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Masrat Jan; Wasim Mohammad Bhat; Muqtasid Rashid; Basharat Ahad
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 9.  COVID-19 coagulopathy in pregnancy: Critical review, preliminary recommendations, and ISTH registry-Communication from the ISTH SSC for Women's Health.

Authors:  Rezan Abdul Kadir; Takao Kobayashi; Toshiaki Iba; Offer Erez; Jecko Thachil; Sajida Kazi; Ann Kinga Malinowski; Maha Othman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 16.036

10.  Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Allotey; Elena Stallings; Mercedes Bonet; Magnus Yap; Shaunak Chatterjee; Tania Kew; Luke Debenham; Anna Clavé Llavall; Anushka Dixit; Dengyi Zhou; Rishab Balaji; Siang Ing Lee; Xiu Qiu; Mingyang Yuan; Dyuti Coomar; Jameela Sheikh; Heidi Lawson; Kehkashan Ansari; Madelon van Wely; Elizabeth van Leeuwen; Elena Kostova; Heinke Kunst; Asma Khalil; Simon Tiberi; Vanessa Brizuela; Nathalie Broutet; Edna Kara; Caron Rahn Kim; Anna Thorson; Olufemi T Oladapo; Lynne Mofenson; Javier Zamora; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.