Literature DB >> 32758659

Characteristics and predictors of death among 4035 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spain.

Juan Berenguer1, Pablo Ryan2, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño3, Inmaculada Jarrín4, Jordi Carratalà5, Jerónimo Pachón6, María Yllescas7, José Ramón Arriba8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the characteristics and predictors of death in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Spain.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed of the first consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 confirmed by real-time PCR assay in 127 Spanish centres until 17 March 2020. The follow-up censoring date was 17 April 2020. We collected demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment and complications data. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with death.
RESULTS: Of the 4035 patients, male subjects accounted for 2433 (61.0%) of 3987, the median age was 70 years and 2539 (73.8%) of 3439 had one or more comorbidity. The most common symptoms were a history of fever, cough, malaise and dyspnoea. During hospitalization, 1255 (31.5%) of 3979 patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, 736 (18.5%) of 3988 were admitted to intensive care units and 619 (15.5%) of 3992 underwent mechanical ventilation. Virus- or host-targeted medications included lopinavir/ritonavir (2820/4005, 70.4%), hydroxychloroquine (2618/3995, 65.5%), interferon beta (1153/3950, 29.2%), corticosteroids (1109/3965, 28.0%) and tocilizumab (373/3951, 9.4%). Overall, 1131 (28%) of 4035 patients died. Mortality increased with age (85.6% occurring in older than 65 years). Seventeen factors were independently associated with an increased hazard of death, the strongest among them including advanced age, liver cirrhosis, low age-adjusted oxygen saturation, higher concentrations of C-reactive protein and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide comprehensive information about characteristics and complications of severe COVID-19, and may help clinicians identify patients at a higher risk of death.
Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Coronavirus; Pneumonia; Respiratory distress syndrome; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32758659      PMCID: PMC7399713          DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   13.310


Introduction

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in China in December 2019 and has spread globally, creating a worldwide pandemic and a public health crisis of historic dimensions [1]. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies widely, from asymptomatic disease to pneumonia and life-threatening complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multisystem organ failure and ultimately death [[2], [3], [4]]. Several case series or cohorts describing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 have been reported summarizing the experience of city or regional hospitals in China [2,5,6], Singapore [7] and New York City [8,9], as well as case series of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in China [10], Italy [4] and the United States [11]. However, variations in the rates for COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths may occur across different areas even in the same country, suggesting differences in population characteristics or inequities in the access to care [12]. We are aware of three prior published nationwide cohorts of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, two from China [3,13] and one from the United Kingdom [14]. None of these three cohorts explored both clinical and laboratory variables associated with hospital death. Our study aimed to determine the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spain, and to identify clinical and laboratory predictors of death.

Patients and methods

Design and patient selection

COVID-19@Spain is a retrospective nationwide cohort study of patients admitted to Spanish hospitals with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2. Investigators from participating centres were asked to include the first consecutive hospitalized patients (up to 100) meeting the study criteria from the start of the epidemic in Spain until 17 March 2020. The Ethics Committee for Research with Medicines of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón approved the study and waived informed consent for the collection of clinical data.

Investigations

The data source comprised the electronic medical records. All data were collected using an electronic case report form (eCRF), a modified version of the World Health Organization International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) Core CRF [15]. The eCRF was built using REDCap electronic data capture tools [16] and was hosted at SEIMC (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology)/GESIDA (AIDS Study Group) Foundation (FSG). The variables registered included administrative data, epidemiologic information and type of clinical specimen in which the diagnosis was confirmed. We also registered demographics, comorbidities, current medications, signs and symptoms at admission, baseline laboratory tests results, chest radiographic findings at baseline and during follow-up, development of ARDS and other complications during hospitalization, use of medications with purported activity against COVID-19, use of adjunctive medications to modulate the host inflammatory response, admission to a high-dependency unit or ICU, noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, vasopressor agents and renal replacement therapy. The clinical status of the patients as of 17 April 2020 was categorized as discharged alive (with date of discharge), alive and currently hospitalized or dead (with date of death). For patients who were discharged and subsequently readmitted during the study period, only one hospital admission episode was considered for purposes of analysis.

Outcome

The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Baseline was the date of hospital admission. The follow-up censoring date was 17 April 2020.

Definitions

Comorbidities and complications during hospitalization were defined as diagnoses included in the medical record. Cancer was defined as the presence of an active solid or haematologic malignant neoplasm. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of >30 kg/m2. ARDS was defined as the acute onset or worsening of respiratory symptoms with severe hypoxaemia and bilateral opacities on chest radiograph not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload [17].

Study oversight

The investigators of each participating centre vouch for the completeness and accuracy of the data. FSG monitors maintained close contact with investigators for problem resolution during the period of data retrieval; they checked the database for missing, invalid and inconsistent data; and they managed queries before the analysis.

Statistical analysis

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with death. To obtain a reduced set of variables from the broad set of predictors, we carried out a blockwise forward procedure allocating the predictor variables into five clusters: sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, admission signs and symptoms, vital signs and laboratory parameters. A multivariable regression analysis was fitted within each block using two criteria to achieve the best set of predictors: relevance to the clinical situation and statistical significance (p < 0.10). We used variance inflation factors to detect collinearity among predictors included in the multivariable models. We carried out a sensitivity analysis in which the order of entry of the blocks was inverted. We checked the proportional hazards assumption. Variables with more than 25% missing values have not been considered, and missing values were treated as a separate category for analysis. Heterogeneity introduced by different hospitals was accounted for by using robust methods to estimate standard errors, and thus to calculate 95% confidence intervals and p values. Statistical analyses were performed by Stata 15.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as trial NCT04355871. The STROBE guidelines were used to ensure the reporting of the study (Supplementary Table S1).

Results

The final cohort included 4035 hospitalized patients (Supplementary Fig. S1) in whom SARS-CoV-2 was detected by RT-PCR by testing nasopharyngeal swabs (89.6%), pharyngeal swabs (13.4%), low respiratory tract specimens (1.3%) and other specimens (4.4%). The median admission date was 13 March 2020, with little variability among the median admission date between the centres (range from 6 to 17 March). The median follow-up time was 34 days (interquartile range (IQR), 24–37 days). A total of 141 patients (3.6%) were discharged and readmitted during the study period, a median time of 5 days (IQR, 2–9 days) after discharge.

Demographics and presenting clinical features

Patient characteristics, categorized by survival, are shown in Table 1 . In brief, male subjects accounted for 61.0%, the median age was 70 years and 25.1% were ≥80 years old. Most patients were Spanish-born whites. The age distribution of patients stratified by sex is shown in Fig. 1 (A).
Table 1

Demographics, comorbidity data and current medications of 4035 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 stratified according to vital status at study censoring date

CharacteristicAlive (n = 2904)Dead (n = 1131)pTotal (N = 4035)
Sex<0.001
 Male1666/2868 (58.1)767/1119 (68.5)2433/3987 (61.0)
 Female1202/2868 (41.9)352/1119 (31.5)1554/3987 (39.0)
Pregnant female13/1136 (1.1)2/329 (0.6)0.39515/1465 (1.0)
 Gestational week, median (IQR)33 (17–38)33 (17–38)
Age
 Median (IQR) (years)65 (51–75)79 (71–86)<0.00170 (56–80)
 Distribution<0.001
 0–10 years13/2901 (0.4)2/1130 (0.2)15/4031 (0.4)
 11–20 years18/2901 (0.6)0/1130 (0)18/4031 (0.5)
 21–30 years89/2901 (3.1)2/1130 (0.2)91/4031 (2.3)
 31–40 years210/2901 (7.2)5/1130 (0.4)215/4031 (5.3)
 41–50 years373/2901 (12.9)18/1130 (1.6)391/4031 (9.7)
 51–60 years483/2901 (16.6)68/1130 (6.0)551/4031 (13.7)
 61–70 years624/2901 (21.5)167/1130 (14.8)791/4031 (19.6)
 71–80 years675/2901 (23.3)357/1130 (31.6)1032/4031 (25.6)
 81–90 years355/2901 (12.2)389/1130 (34.4)744/4031 (18.5)
 ≥91 years61/2901 (2.1)122/1130 (10.8)183/4031 (4.5)
Country of birth<0.001
 Spain2505/2819 (88.9)1065/1101 (96.7)3570/3920 (91.1)
 Other314/2819 (11.1)36/1101 (3.3)350/3920 (8.9)
Ethnic group<0.001
 Arab21/2821 (0.7)3/1094 (0.3)24/3915 (0.6)
 Asian16/2821 (0.6)2/1094 (0.2)18/3915 (0.5)
 Black12/2821 (0.4)012/3915 (0.3)
 Latin American166/2821 (5.9)20/1094 (1.8)186/3915 (4.7)
 White2578/2821 (91.4)1064/1094 (97.3)3642/3915 (93.0)
 Other28/2821 (1.0)5/1094 (0.5)33/3915 (0.8)
Comorbidity
 Smoking history<0.001
 Current smoker134/2123 (6.3)63/794 (7.9)197/2917 (6.7)
 Former smoker613/2123 (28.9)334/794 (42.1)947/2917 (32.5)
 Never smoked1376/2123 (64.8)397/794 (50.0)1773/2917 (60.8)
 Comorbid conditions<0.001
 0848/2501 (33.9)52/938 (5.5)900/3439 (26.2)
 1–21172/2501 (46.9)448/938 (47.8)1620/3439 (47.1)
 ≥3481/2501 (19.2)438/938 (46.7)919/3439 (26.7)
 Types of comorbid conditions
 Hypertension1251/2885 (43.4)801/1125 (71.2)<0.0012052/4010 (51.2)
 Chronic heart disease488/2875 (17.0)444/1119 (39.7)<0.001932/3994 (23.3)
 Diabetes514/2884 (17.8)357/1118 (31.9)<0.001871/4002 (21.8)
 Chronic pulmonary disease (not asthma)405/2879 (14.1)310/1116 (27.8)<0.001715/3995 (17.9)
 Obesity316/2618 (12.1)181/988 (18.3)<0.001497/3606 (13.8)
 Chronic neurologic disorder203/2886 (7.0)170/1116 (15.2)<0.001373/4002 (9.3)
 Dementia124/2871 (4.3)191/1108 (17.2)<0.001315/3979 (7.9)
 Asthma230/2884 (8.0)69/1116 (6.2)0.053299/4000 (7.5)
 Solid neoplasm (active)146/2882 (5.1)121/1116 (10.8)<0.001267/3998 (6.7)
 Inflammatory disease148/2883 (5.1)83/1114 (7.4)0.005231/3997 (5.8)
 Chronic kidney disease stage 4 (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)87/2882 (3.0)112/1118 (10.0)<0.001199/4000 (5.0)
 Haematologic neoplasm (active)45/2885 (1.6)47/1120 (4.2)<0.00192/4005 (2.3)
 Liver cirrhosis28/2882 (1.0)26/1116 (2.3)0.00154/3998 (1.3)
 HIV/AIDS20/2860 (0.7)6/1102 (0.5)0.58926/3962 (0.7)
 Current medications
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors489/2878 (17.0)283/1105 (25.6)<0.001772/3983 (19.4)
 Angiotensin II receptor blockers434/2879 (15.1)254/1108 (22.9)<0.001688/3987 (17.3)
 Corticosteroids, inhaled303/2875 (10.5)184/1110 (16.6)<0.001487/3985 (12.2)
 Corticosteroids, systemic113/2872 (3.9)95/1110 (8.6)<0.001208/3982 (5.2)
 Antineoplastic agents59/2875 (2.0)49/1110 (4.4)<0.001108/3985 (2.7)
 Biologic anti-inflammatory drugs69/2871 (2.4)27/1106 (2.4)0.94496/3977 (2.4)
 Antiretroviral drugs15/19 (78.9)6/6 (100.0)0.22021/25 (84.0)

Values are displayed as n/N with data (%).

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range.

Fig. 1

(A) Distribution of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stratified by age and sex. (B) Mortality of patients with COVID-19 stratified by age and sex.

Demographics, comorbidity data and current medications of 4035 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 stratified according to vital status at study censoring date Values are displayed as n/N with data (%). eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range. (A) Distribution of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stratified by age and sex. (B) Mortality of patients with COVID-19 stratified by age and sex. At least one comorbidity was present in 73.8%, and 26.7% had at least three comorbid conditions. The most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension (51.2%), chronic heart disease (23.3%), diabetes mellitus (21.8%), chronic pulmonary disease (not asthma) (17.9%) and obesity (13.8%). Only 0.7% patients had HIV. Before admission, 19.4% patients had been provided angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and 17.3% were receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers (Table 1). The median duration of symptoms before hospitalization was 4 days (IQR, 2–7 days), and the most commonly reported symptoms were history of fever (81.0%), cough (71.8%), malaise (64.0%), dyspnoea (49.1%), upper respiratory tract symptoms (30.8%), myalgia or arthralgia (24.9%) and sputum production (24.1%) (Supplementary Table S2). Abnormal vital signs at admission included fever (40.9%), arterial hypotension (18.8%) and marked tachypnoea (10.9%). Low age-adjusted arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) levels on room air were reported in 26.6% patients (Supplementary Table S3).

Chest radiograph findings

Infiltrates on initial chest radiograph were observed in 77.6% patients, of whom 71.3% had bilateral involvement. Over the whole hospital course, worsening of the baseline infiltrates was observed in 64.7% patients, with new lesions in 51.0%.

Laboratory findings

Baseline laboratory findings are shown in Table 2 . The most common abnormalities in blood counts included lymphopenia (54.2%) and thrombocytopenia (31.5%). The median neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was 4.5. A prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time was present in 9.4%, and 57.1% had D-dimer levels above the normal range. High serum levels were reported from alanine aminotransferase (25.3%), aspartate aminotransferase (34.7%), lactate dehydrogenase (64.5%), creatine kinase (23.5%), C-reactive protein (91.9%) and procalcitonin (14.2%). Low serum albumin was found in 36.0% patients, and 6.8% had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Ferritin and interleukin 6 were determined in a limited number of patients, and high concentrations of these parameters were found in 75.1% and 90.0% respectively.
Table 2

Laboratory findings of 4035 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 stratified according to vital status at study censoring date

Laboratory parameterAlive (n = 2904)Death (n = 1131)pTotal (N = 4035)
Haemoglobin
 No. of patients with data286011203980
 Median (IQR) (g/L)13.8 (12.6–14.9)12.9 (11.5–14.4)<0.00113.6 (12.3–14.8)
Haematocrit
 No. of patients with data283211053937
 Median (IQR) (%)41.0 (37.9–44.0)39.1 (34.8–43.0)<0.00140.6 (37.0–44.0)
WBC count
 Median (IQR) (×109/L)5635 (4330–7420)6900 (5000–9470)<0.0015910 (4490–7990)
 Distribution<0.001
 >12 000 × 109/L152/2854 (5.3)160/1117 (14.3)312/3971 (7.9)
 <4000 × 109/L529/2854 (18.5)137/1117 (12.3)666/3971 (16.8)
Neutrophil count
 Median (IQR) (/μL)3920 (2800–5560)5300 (3530–7700)<0.0014200 (2920–6120)
 <1000/μL51/2848 (1.8)24/1113 (2.2)0.44875/3961 (1.9)
Lymphocyte count
 Median (IQR) (/μL)1000 (700–1360)780 (540–1160)<0.001900 (640–1300)
 <1000/μL1423/2852 (49.9)727/1111 (65.4)<0.0012150/3963 (54.2)
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
 Median (IQR)3.9 (2.5–6.5)6.6 (3.7–11.4)<0.0014.5 (2.7–7.7)
 Distribution
 Tertile 11094/2839 (38.5)222/1106 (20.1)<0.0011316/3945 (33.4)
 Tertile 21005/2839 (35.4)309/1106 (27.9)1314/3945 (33.3)
 Tertile 3740/2839 (26.1)575/1106 (52.0)1315/3945 (33.3)
Platelets
 Median (IQR) (×109/L)181 000 (143 000–229 000)168 000 (130 000–221 000)<0.001178 000 (139 000–226 000)
 Platelets <150 000 × 109/L831/2842 (29.2)416/1118 (37.2)<0.0011247/3960 (31.5)
Prolonged APTT (>39.2 seconds or ratio >1.25)161/2232 (7.2)133/880 (15.1)<0.001294/3112 (9.4)
INR
 Median (IQR)1.1 (1.0–1.2)1.2 (1.1–1.3)<0.0011.1 (1.0–1.2)
 INR > 1.1954/2376 (40.1)549/925 (59.3)<0.0011503/3301 (45.5)
D-dimer
 Median (IQR) (ng/mL)548 (328–934)740 (410–1590)<0.001580 (339–1040)
 High D-dimer levels (>500 ng/mL)639/1184 (54.0)253/379 (66.7)<0.001892/1563 (57.1)
Glucose
 No. of patients with data276610843850
 Median (IQR) (mg/dL)106 (93–126)125 (104–165)<0.001110 (95–136)
Creatinine
 No. of patients with data283211113943
 Median (IQR)0.88 (0.72–1.07)1.10 (0.84–1.46)<0.0010.92 (0.74–1.18)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) (CKD-EPI)
 Median (IQR)84.1 (65.3–97.4)60.2 (40.1–80.4)<0.00178.4 (56.5–93.6)
 Distribution<0.001
 >60 mL/min/1.73 m22234/2797 (79.9)552/1098 (50.3)2786/3895 (71.5)
 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2456/2797 (16.3)388/1098 (35.3)844/3895 (21.7)
 <30 mL/min/1.73 m2107/2797 (3.8)158/1098 (14.4)265/3895 (6.8)
Sodium
 No. of patients with data282511093934
 Median (IQR) (mEq/L)138 (135–140)137 (135–140)0.008138 (135–140)
Potassium
 No. of patients with data277010703840
 Median (IQR) (mEq/L)4.1 (3.8–4.4)4.2 (3.8–4.6)<0.0014.1 (3.8–4.4)
ALT
 Median (IQR) (U/L)27 (18–42)25 (17–38)0.00326 (18–41)
 High serum levels ≥40 U/L and ≤200 U/L630/2369 (26.6)190/870 (21.8)0.021820/3239 (25.3)
 High serum levels >200 U/L23/2369 (1.0)8/870 (0.9)31/3239 (1.0)
AST
 Median (IQR) (U/L)31 (23–45)34 (23–52)0.03332 (23–48)
 High serum levels ≥ 40 U/L and ≤200 U/L680/2051 (33.1)291/750 (38.8)0.011971/2801 (34.7)
 High serum levels >200 U/L17/2051 (0.8)9/750 (1.2)26/2801 (0.9)
AST/ALT ratio<0.001
 <1675/2013 (33.5)166/733 (22.6)841/2746 (30.6)
 ≥11338/2013 (66.5)567/733 (77.4)1905/2746 (69.4)
Total bilirubin
 No. of patients with data19207302650
 Median (IQR) (mg/dL)0.50 (0.37–0.71)0.56 (0.39–0.87)<0.0010.50 (0.37–0.80)
Serum albumin
 Median (IQR) (g/dL)3.6 (3.2–4.0)3.4 (3.0–3.8)<0.0013.5 (3.2–3.9)
 Low albumin levels (<3.4 g/dL)310/991 (31.3)198/420 (47.1)<0.001508/1411 (36.0)
Lactate dehydrogenase
 Median (IQR) (U/L)281 (215–382)318 (250–463)<0.001290 (224–403)
 High lactate dehydrogenase (>250 U/L)1154/1895 (60.9)510/683 (74.7)<0.0011664/2578 (64.5)
CRP
 Median (IQR) (mg/L)44 (16–95)87 (38–168)<0.00154 (20–116)
 High CRP levels (>5 mg/L)2388/2654 (90.0)990/1023 (96.8)<0.0013378/3677 (91.9)
Procalcitonin
 Median (IQR) (μg/L)0.09 (0.05–0.16)0.22 (0.10–0.56)<0.0010.11 (0.06–0.25)
 High procalcitonin levels (>0.50 μg/L)105/1135 (9.2)119/439 (27.1)<0.001224/1574 (14.2)
Creatine kinase
 Median (IQR) (U/L)90 (56–169)101 (56–217)0.04892 (56–182)
 High creatine kinase levels (>190 U/L)184/882 (20.9)102/336 (30.4)<0.001286/1218 (23.5)
Ferritin
 Median (IQR) (μg/L)611 (278–1238)792 (400–1670)0.002649 (301–1363)
 High ferritin levels (>300 μg/L)315/433 (72.7)125/153 (81.7)0.028440/586 (75.1)
Interleukin 6
 Median (IQR) (pg/mL)33 (13–77)117 (40–512)42 (16–105)
 High interleukin levels (>4.3 pg/mL)175/201 (87.1)58/58 (100.0)0.004233/259 (90.0)

Values are displayed as n/N with data (%) unless otherwise indicated.

ALT, alanine, aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; INR, international normalized ratio; IQR, interquartile range; WBC, white blood cell count.

Laboratory findings of 4035 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 stratified according to vital status at study censoring date Values are displayed as n/N with data (%) unless otherwise indicated. ALT, alanine, aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; INR, international normalized ratio; IQR, interquartile range; WBC, white blood cell count.

Supportive therapy and medications

High-dependency unit or ICU admission was required for 18.5% patients, 15.5% underwent mechanical ventilation, 11.9% received vasopressors and 3.0% received renal-replacement therapy (Supplementary Table S4). Virus-targeted agents were administered to 82.0% patients: lopinavir/ritonavir to 70.4%, hydroxychloroquine to 65.5% and subcutaneous interferon beta to 29.2%, usually in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir. Host-targeted agents included systemic corticosteroids in 28.0% and tocilizumab in 9.4%. Antibiotics other than azithromycin were administered to 80.9% and antifungals to 3.2% (Supplementary Table S5).

Complications and mortality

The full list of complications during the hospital course is provided in Supplementary Table S6. The most common were ARDS (31.5%), acute kidney injury (15.4%), presumed bacterial pneumonia (10.6%), heart failure (5.8%) and bloodstream infection (4.9%). During the study period, 28.0% patients died, 64.1% were discharged and 7.8% remained hospitalized. The median (IQR) time to death since the beginning of symptoms and since hospital admission was 13 (9–19) days and 10 (6–16) days, respectively. Death was particularly high among patients aged ≥80 years (54.9%) (Fig. 1(B)) and those with three or more comorbid conditions (47.7%). Death was also very high among those with ARDS (59.3%), those who were admitted to the ICU (42.4%) and those who underwent mechanical ventilation (45.7%). The median (IQR) length of stay was 4 (1–9) days for patients who were discharged and 35 (32–38) days for those who remained hospitalized at the censoring date.

Predictors of death

Independent predictors of death in the different clusters of variables are shown in Table 3 . In the final adjusted analysis, we found 17 factors independently associated with an increased hazard of death: male sex, older age, arterial hypertension, obesity, liver cirrhosis, chronic neurologic disorder, active cancer, dementia, dyspnoea, confusion, low age-adjusted SaO2 on room air, higher white cell blood count, higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lower platelet count, prolonged international normalized ratio, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher concentrations of C-reactive protein (Fig. 2 ). No collinearity was detected, the proportional hazards assumption was fulfilled and the results were not changed when the order of entry of the blocks was inverted. Kaplan-Meier plots for death according to age and sex are shown in Fig. 3 . The adjusted hazard ratio of death for being admitted early in the epidemic (before 13 March) versus later was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.28; p 0.407). The variable unilateral or bilateral lung opacities had missing values in 29% individuals and was not included in the final model. However, when this variable was included in the model, the adjusted hazard ratio of death for bilateral opacities compared to unilateral opacities was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.11–1.55; p 0.002). We also carried out two post hoc analyses (data not shown). In the first one, the predictors of mortality among patients aged ≤65 years were not substantially different from those found in the whole dataset. In the second analysis, the mortality hazard did not change depending on the seroprevalence of IgG anti–SARS-CoV-2 at the provincial level, according to a recent nationwide study in Spain [18].
Table 3

Independent predictors of death in different clusters of variables

CharacteristicHR (95% CI)p
Sociodemographic characteristics
Male sex1.52 (1.33–1.73)<0.001
Age (ref. 0–49 years)
 50–65 years3.76 (2.43–5.83)<0.001
 66–79 years8.87 (5.85–13.43)<0.001
 80+ years20.75 (13.72–31.37)<0.001
Comorbidities
 Hypertension1.81 (1.56–2.09)<0.001
 Chronic heart disease1.58 (1.38–1.81)<0.001
 Diabetes1.23 (1.07–1.41)0.003
 Chronic pulmonary disease (not asthma)1.40 (1.21–1.61)<0.001
 Obesity1.21 (1.01–1.44)0.036
 Chronic kidney disease stage 4 (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)1.55 (1.26–1.91)<0.001
 Liver cirrhosis1.59 (1.03–2.43)0.034
 Chronic neurologic disorder1.30 (1.08–1.57)0.006
 Cancer1.59 (1.33–1.90)<0.001
 Dementia2.28 (1.90–2.73)<0.001
Admission signs and symptoms
 Headache0.50 (0.37–0.68)<0.001
 Myalgia/arthralgia0.70 (0.59–0.84)<0.001
 Anosmia0.50 (0.22–1.14)0.099
 Cough0.70 (0.60–0.80)<0.001
 Sputum production1.26 (1.09–1.47)0.002
 Dyspnea1.93 (1.69–2.19)<0.001
 Chest pain0.64 (0.51–0.81)<0.001
 Vomiting/nausea0.77 (0.62–0.95)0.016
 Altered consciousness2.26 (1.93–2.66)<0.001
Vital signs
 Low SaO2 (age-adjusted)a2.62 (2.29–3.00)<0.001
Laboratory parameters
WBC count (ref. <4000 × 109/L)
 4000–12 000 × 109/L1.11 (0.91–1.35)0.323
 >12 000 × 109/L1.54 (1.18–2.01)0.002
Neutrophil count (ref. ≥1000/μL)
 <1000/μL1.77 (1.12–2.79)0.015
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ref. <3.22 (tertile 1))
 3.22–6.33 (tertile 2)1.41 (1.17–1.69)<0.001
 >6.33 (tertile 3)2.38 (1.99–2.84)<0.001
Platelets (ref. ≥150 000 × 109/L)
 <150 000 × 109/L1.41 (1.24–1.60)<0.001
Prolonged APTT (>39.2 seconds or ratio >1.25)1.34 (1.09–1.64)0.006
INR (ref. ≤1.1)
 >1.11.49 (1.28–1.73)<0.001
eGFR (ref. > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)
 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m22.24 (1.95–2.58)<0.001
 <30 mL/min/1.73 m22.68 (2.21–3.25)<0.001
ALT (ref. <40 U/L)
 40–200 U/L0.84 (0.71–0.99)0.042
 >200 U/L0.86 (0.42–1.78)0.692
CRP (ref. ≤5 mg/L)
 >5 mg/L2.43 (1.69–3.49)<0.001

ALT, alanine, aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CI = confidence interval; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR = hazard ratio; INR, international normalized ratio; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation; WBC, white blood cell count.

Age-adjusted low SaO2 ≤90% for patients aged >50 years and ≤93% for patients aged ≤50 years.

Fig. 2

Univariable (A) and multivariable (B) Cox proportional hazards model of variables associated with death. CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; INR, international normalized ratio; N/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; WBC, white blood cell count.

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier plots for death according to age (A) and sex (B).

Independent predictors of death in different clusters of variables ALT, alanine, aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CI = confidence interval; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR = hazard ratio; INR, international normalized ratio; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation; WBC, white blood cell count. Age-adjusted low SaO2 ≤90% for patients aged >50 years and ≤93% for patients aged ≤50 years. Univariable (A) and multivariable (B) Cox proportional hazards model of variables associated with death. CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; INR, international normalized ratio; N/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; WBC, white blood cell count. Kaplan-Meier plots for death according to age (A) and sex (B).

Discussion

Our cohort describes the presenting characteristics and outcomes of 4035 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 127 centres in Spain during the first month of the country outbreak. We are aware of three prior published nationwide cohorts of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, two from China [3,13] and one from the United Kingdom. The majority of patients in all four cohorts were male. However, compared to Chinese patients, those from Spain and the United Kingdom were, on average, two decades older and had a prevalence three times higher of comorbid conditions. It is thus not surprising that mortality was substantially higher in Spain (28%) and the United Kingdom (26%) than in China (1.4% and 3.2%). Presenting features were similar in all cohorts. However, dyspnoea was less frequent in Chinese patients, suggesting a more severe course in the older Spanish and British patients. In our cohort, age was the main determinant of death, as has been in other series of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 [3,8,9,14,19]. Independent of the higher prevalence of comorbidities, it cannot be ruled out that older patients could not have been prioritized to receive ICU treatment. Death was also significantly higher in men than in women, as has also been described in other cohorts [3,8,9,13,14]. There are sex differences in innate and adaptive immune responses that might have an impact on the inflammatory response and outcomes of COVID-19 and therefore deserve further investigation [20]. Hypertension was not only the most common comorbidity in our cohort, as in other studies, but it was an independent predictor of mortality. The association between hypertension and poor outcomes in COVID-19 does not seem to be simply a matter of high prevalence; alternative explanations include preexisting hypertensive end-organ or endothelial damage, and interactions between COVID-19 and antihypertensive medications [21]. Many patients with hypertension were receiving ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, but these drugs did not increase mortality. Obesity was the fifth most common comorbidity in our cohort, but one with the highest hazard of mortality. Obesity has been found to increase the risk of hospitalization and severe outcomes during influenza seasons [22]. Recent studies of COVID-19 patients indicate that younger hospitalized individuals are more likely to be obese [23] and that obesity is associated with severe clinical pictures [[23], [24], [25]] and increased mortality [14]. Other underlying conditions associated with an increased hazard of death were active cancer and cirrhosis, as has been reported elsewhere [26,27], meaning that clinicians should consider patients with these underlying conditions to be at high risk for COVID-19 [27]. We identified several routine laboratory markers as predictors of mortality, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, an indicator of systemic inflammation that has been found to be of prognostic utility in sepsis [28] and COVID-19 [29,30]. Our study is limited by the retrospective design and the high number of sites, which might have jeopardized the quality of the data. We tried to solve this by selecting simple and well-defined variables and by carefully monitoring of the data. Admission criteria might have differed between the sites; nevertheless, we controlled the site effect in the analysis. We could not include in the multivariable model some potentially interesting laboratory parameters; nor could we include changes in laboratory findings over time. The study's strengths include the large sample size, which allowed the identification of a high number of predictors of death at admission, the analysis of clinical and laboratory variables, and the inclusion of sites from areas with different incidence rates. In summary, here we report the clinical characteristics of a large cohort of patients with COVID-19 consecutively admitted to hospitals in Spain during the first month of the epidemic. Our findings provide comprehensive information about the characteristics and complications of severe COVID-19, and may help us identify patients at hospital admission with a higher risk of death.

Transparency declaration

This work was supported by Fundación SEIMC/GeSIDA. JB, JR-B, IJ, JC, JP and JRA received funding for research from Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and , Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, cofinanced by European Development Regional Fund ‘A way to achieve Europe’, Operative Program Intelligent Growth 2014–2020, Spanish AIDS Research Network (RIS) (RD16/0025/0017 (JB), RD16/0025/0018 (JRA), RD16CIII/0002/0006 (IJ)) and Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) (RD16/0016/0001 (JRB), RD16/0016/0005 (JC) and RD16/0016/0009 (JP). JB reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Gilead, grants and personal fees from MSD, grants and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare and personal fees from Janssen, outside the submitted work. PR reports personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Janssen, grants from MSD and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. IJ reports personal fees from Gilead and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. JRA reports grants and personal fees from Alexa, grants and personal fees from Gilead, grants and personal fees from MSD, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Serono, grants and personal fees from Teva and grants and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in immune responses.

Authors:  Sabra L Klein; Katie L Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore.

Authors:  Barnaby Edward Young; Sean Wei Xiang Ong; Shirin Kalimuddin; Jenny G Low; Seow Yen Tan; Jiashen Loh; Oon-Tek Ng; Kalisvar Marimuthu; Li Wei Ang; Tze Minn Mak; Sok Kiang Lau; Danielle E Anderson; Kian Sing Chan; Thean Yen Tan; Tong Yong Ng; Lin Cui; Zubaidah Said; Lalitha Kurupatham; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Monica Chan; Shawn Vasoo; Lin-Fa Wang; Boon Huan Tan; Raymond Tzer Pin Lin; Vernon Jian Ming Lee; Yee-Sin Leo; David Chien Lye
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Toni K Choueiri; Dimpy P Shah; Yu Shyr; Samuel M Rubinstein; Donna R Rivera; Sanjay Shete; Chih-Yuan Hsu; Aakash Desai; Gilberto de Lima Lopes; Petros Grivas; Corrie A Painter; Solange Peters; Michael A Thompson; Ziad Bakouny; Gerald Batist; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Mehmet A Bilen; Nathaniel Bouganim; Mateo Bover Larroya; Daniel Castellano; Salvatore A Del Prete; Deborah B Doroshow; Pamela C Egan; Arielle Elkrief; Dimitrios Farmakiotis; Daniel Flora; Matthew D Galsky; Michael J Glover; Elizabeth A Griffiths; Anthony P Gulati; Shilpa Gupta; Navid Hafez; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jessica E Hawley; Emily Hsu; Anup Kasi; Ali R Khaki; Christopher A Lemmon; Colleen Lewis; Barbara Logan; Tyler Masters; Rana R McKay; Ruben A Mesa; Alicia K Morgans; Mary F Mulcahy; Orestis A Panagiotou; Prakash Peddi; Nathan A Pennell; Kerry Reynolds; Lane R Rosen; Rachel Rosovsky; Mary Salazar; Andrew Schmidt; Sumit A Shah; Justin A Shaya; John Steinharter; Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein; Suki Subbiah; Donald C Vinh; Firas H Wehbe; Lisa B Weissmann; Julie Tsu-Yu Wu; Elizabeth Wulff-Burchfield; Zhuoer Xie; Albert Yeh; Peter P Yu; Alice Y Zhou; Leyre Zubiri; Sanjay Mishra; Gary H Lyman; Brian I Rini; Jeremy L Warner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Hypertension and COVID-19.

Authors:  Ernesto L Schiffrin; John M Flack; Sadayoshi Ito; Paul Muntner; R Clinton Webb
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Matthew J Cummings; Matthew R Baldwin; Darryl Abrams; Samuel D Jacobson; Benjamin J Meyer; Elizabeth M Balough; Justin G Aaron; Jan Claassen; LeRoy E Rabbani; Jonathan Hastie; Beth R Hochman; John Salazar-Schicchi; Natalie H Yip; Daniel Brodie; Max R O'Donnell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Yuwei Liu; Xuebei Du; Jing Chen; Yalei Jin; Li Peng; Harry H X Wang; Mingqi Luo; Ling Chen; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Patients With Preexisting Liver Disease in the United States: A Multicenter Research Network Study.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh; Ahmad Khan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Clinical Characteristics of Covid-19 in New York City.

Authors:  Parag Goyal; Justin J Choi; Laura C Pinheiro; Edward J Schenck; Ruijun Chen; Assem Jabri; Michael J Satlin; Thomas R Campion; Musarrat Nahid; Joanna B Ringel; Katherine L Hoffman; Mark N Alshak; Han A Li; Graham T Wehmeyer; Mangala Rajan; Evgeniya Reshetnyak; Nathaniel Hupert; Evelyn M Horn; Fernando J Martinez; Roy M Gulick; Monika M Safford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  111 in total

Review 1.  [Obesity in the COVID era: A global health challenge].

Authors:  Miguel A Rubio Herrera; Irene Bretón Lesmes
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 2.  SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 severity in persons with HIV on antiretroviral treatment.

Authors:  Julia Del Amo; Rosa Polo; Santiago Moreno; Inma Jarrín; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Sequelae, persistent symptomatology and outcomes after COVID-19 hospitalization: the ANCOHVID multicentre 6-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Álvaro Romero-Duarte; Mario Rivera-Izquierdo; Inmaculada Guerrero-Fernández de Alba; Marina Pérez-Contreras; Nicolás Francisco Fernández-Martínez; Rafael Ruiz-Montero; Álvaro Serrano-Ortiz; Rocío Ortiz González-Serna; Inmaculada Salcedo-Leal; Eladio Jiménez-Mejías; Antonio Cárdenas-Cruz
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Cancer, Mortality, and Acute Kidney Injury among Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Johnathan A Khusid; Adan Z Becerra; Blair Gallante; Areeba S Sadiq; William M Atallah; Ketan K Badani; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

5.  Correlates of In-Hospital COVID-19 Deaths: A Competing Risks Survival Time Analysis of Retrospective Mortality Data.

Authors:  Ashish Goel; Alpana Raizada; Ananya Agrawal; Kamakshi Bansal; Saurabh Uniyal; Pratima Prasad; Anil Yadav; Asha Tyagi; R S Rautela
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.385

6.  IL-6 and Other Biomarkers associated with Poor Prognosis in a Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Madrid.

Authors:  Encarnación Donoso-Navarro; Ignacio Arribas Gómez; Francisco A Bernabeu-Andreu
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Prone Position in COVID-19 Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Conventional Oxygen Therapy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jose Loureiro-Amigo; Cecilia Suárez-Carantoña; Isabel Oriol; Cristina Sánchez-Díaz; Ana Coloma-Conde; Luis Manzano-Espinosa; Manuel Rubio-Rivas; Barbara Otero-Perpiñá; María Mercedes Ferreiro-Mazón Jenaro; Ainara Coduras-Erdozain; José Luis Garcia-Klepzig; Derly Vargas-Parra; Paula M Pesqueira-Fontán; Isabel Fiteni-Mera; Gema María García-García; José Jiménez-Torres; Pablo Rodríguez-Cortés; Clara Costo-Muriel; Francisco Arnalich-Fernández; Arturo Artero; Francisco Javier Carrasco-Sánchez; Joaquín Escobar-Sevilla; José Nicolás Alcalá-Pedrajas; Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas; José-Manuel Ramos-Rincón
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Possible unrecognised liver injury is associated with mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Mario Romero-Cristóbal; Ana Clemente-Sánchez; Patricia Piñeiro; Jamil Cedeño; Laura Rayón; Julia Del Río; Clara Ramos; Diego-Andrés Hernández; Miguel Cova; Aranzazu Caballero; Ignacio Garutti; Pablo García-Olivares; Javier Hortal; Jose-Eugenio Guerrero; Rita García; Rafael Bañares; Diego Rincón
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.409

9.  Drug-drug interactions between treatment specific pharmacotherapy and concomitant medication in patients with COVID-19 in the first wave in Spain.

Authors:  M D Cantudo-Cuenca; Antonio Gutiérrez-Pizarraya; Ana Pinilla-Fernández; Enrique Contreras-Macías; M Fernández-Fuertes; F A Lao-Domínguez; Pilar Rincón; Juan Antonio Pineda; Juan Macías; Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Harmonized D-dimer levels upon admission for prognosis of COVID-19 severity: Results from a Spanish multicenter registry (BIOCOVID-Spain study).

Authors:  Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo; Daniel Morell-García; Emmanuel J Favaloro; Juan A Vílchez; Josep M Bauça; María J Alcaide Martín; Irene Gutiérrez Garcia; Patricia de la Hera Cagigal; José Manuel Egea-Caparrós; Sonia Pérez Sanmartín; José I Gutiérrez Revilla; Eloísa Urrechaga; Jose M Álamo; Ana M Hernando Holgado; María-Carmen Lorenzo-Lozano; Magdalena Canalda Campás; María A Juncos Tobarra; Cristian Morales-Indiano; Isabel Vírseda Chamorro; Yolanda Pastor Murcia; Laura Sahuquillo Frías; Laura Altimira Queral; Elisa Nuez-Zaragoza; Juan Adell Ruiz de León; Alicia Ruiz Ripa; Paloma Salas Gómez-Pablos; Iria Cebreiros López; Amaia Fernández Uriarte; Alex Larruzea; María L López Yepes; Natalia Sancho-Rodríguez; María C Zamorano Andrés; José Pedregosa Díaz; Luis Sáenz; Clara Esparza Del Valle; María C Baamonde Calzada; Sara García Muñoz; Marina Vera; Esther Martín Torres; Silvia Sánchez Fdez-Pacheco; Luis Vicente Gutiérrez; Laura Jiménez Añón; Alfonso Pérez Martínez; Aurelio Pons Castillo; Ruth González Tamayo; Jorge Férriz Vivancos; Olaia Rodríguez-Fraga; Vicens Díaz-Brito; Vicente Aguadero; M G García Arévalo; María Arnaldos Carrillo; Mercedes González Morales; María Núñez Gárate; Cristina Ruiz Iruela; Patricia Esteban Torrella; Martí Vila Pérez; Cristina Acevedo Alcaraz; Alfonso L Blázquez-Manzanera; Amparo Galán Ortega
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.