Literature DB >> 32758509

Sustainment of Innovations in Palliative Care: A Survey on Lessons Learned From a Nationwide Quality Improvement Program.

Anke J E de Veer1, Margot A H Fleuren2, Hille Voss3, Anneke L Francke4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although much is known about factors influencing short-term implementation, little is known about what factors are relevant for the long-term sustainment of innovations. In the Dutch National Quality Improvement Program for Palliative Care, innovations were implemented in 76 implementation projects.
OBJECTIVES: To give insight into the sustainment strategies used and factors facilitating and hindering sustainment.
METHODS: Online questionnaire with prestructured and open questions sent to the contact persons for 76 implementation projects, 2-6.5 years after the start.
RESULTS: Information was gathered on 63 implementation projects (response 83%). Most projects took place in home care, general practices, and/or nursing homes. Sustainment was attained in 60% of the implementation projects. Six often applied strategies were statistically significantly related to sustainment: 1) realizing coherence between the innovation and the strategic policy of the organization; 2) arranging to have a specific professional responsible for the use of the innovation; 3) integrating the innovation into the organization's broader palliative care policy; 4) arranging accessibility of the innovation; 5) involving management in the implementation project; and 6) giving regular feedback about the implementation. In three-quarters of the projects, barriers and facilitators were encountered relating to characteristics of the care organizations, such as employee turnover and ratification of the project by the management.
CONCLUSION: Applying the six strategies enhances sustainment. The organization plays a decisive role in the sustainment of innovations in palliative care. Engaging the management team in implementation projects from early onset is of utmost importance.
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sustainability; follow-up studies; implementation; innovation; program evaluation; program sustainability

Year:  2020        PMID: 32758509     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  2 in total

1.  What to consider when implementing a tool for timely recognition of palliative care needs in heart failure: a context-based qualitative study.

Authors:  Stephanie M C Ament; Lisette M van den Broek; Marieke H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; Josiane J J Boyne; José M C Maessen; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Louise Bellersen; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Yvonne Engels; Daisy J A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.234

2.  The Perils of a "My Work Here is Done" perspective: a mixed methods evaluation of sustainment of an evidence-based intervention for transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Dawn M Bravata; Edward J Miech; Laura J Myers; Anthony J Perkins; Ying Zhang; Nicholas A Rattray; Sean A Baird; Lauren S Penney; Curt Austin; Teresa M Damush
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.908

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.