Brenda Sequeira Dmello1, Natasha Housseine2, Thomas van den Akker3, Jos van Roosmalen3, Nanna Maaløe4. 1. Comprehensive Community Based Rehabilitation in Tanzania, Dar es Salaam 23310, Tanzania; Medical College, East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: brenda.dmello@ccbrt.or.tz. 2. Medical College, East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 3. Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. 4. Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Previous infectious outbreaks taught us how over-concentrating resources on one vertical programme can aggravate the epidemic of lives lost during childbirth. We applaud Timothy Roberton and colleagues for raising the alarm on how history is repeating itself in this COVID-19 pandemic. Workforce reductions (as staff are quarantined, ill, or reallocated), interrupted supply chains, and decreases in service use are contributing to rising deaths. We draw attention to additional concerns and the increased clinical complexity of maternity care in COVID-19 times, particularly in countries with fragile health systems and the highest maternal and child mortality.Interim guidance released by WHO emphasises fewer clinic visits, early discharge, COVID-19 screening upon admission, and quarantining of suspects until proven negative.2, 3 However, the response is undermined by low testing capacity, delays in obtaining results, constraints in infrastructure, and staffing shortages. Notably, because COVID-19 symptoms mimic obstetric emergencies, triaging women with concomitant complications might be delayed. Moreover, the vertical COVID-19 response leaves women even more vulnerable to delays, neglect in isolation, and substandard management of life-threatening complications. WHO urges context-adaptation of their guidance and continuation of essential health services. However, low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) often do not adapt guidance, because it is a complex and resource-consuming process when non-contextualised recommendations are far from achievable. In LMICs, health services offered are predominantly essential, and little can be discontinued without catastrophic consequences.We are concerned that this vertical COVID-19 response counteracts years of advocacy and arduously achieved health-system improvements for maternity care, with poor interim practice becoming institutionalised into a new, even lower “low normal”. To fulfil the complex demands of COVID-19 management while continuing essential reproductive health services, the number of maternity staff needs to be increased, capacitated, and provided with personal protective equipment, essential medicines, and access to integrated, relevant, and realistic guidelines on respectful maternity and COVID-19 services (appendix).If we manage to integrate the COVID-19 response into essential care, health services everywhere even have a chance to become better, with improved hygiene measures as a new normal, and the WHO daily statistics on COVID-19 deaths could be expanded to include deaths from all causes, including maternal and perinatal mortality. Such an integrated response at regional, national, and international levels, within and beyond maternal health, could trigger long-term strengthening of fragile health-care systems. If we fail and let one disease over-influence care and further debilitate frail health systems, unacceptable suffering and premature deaths will follow.
Authors: Timothy Roberton; Emily D Carter; Victoria B Chou; Angela R Stegmuller; Bianca D Jackson; Yvonne Tam; Talata Sawadogo-Lewis; Neff Walker Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Nanna Maaløe; Tarek Meguid; Natasha Housseine; Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl; Karoline Kragelund Nielsen; Ib Christian Bygbjerg; Jos van Roosmalen Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Nanna Maaløe; Anna Marie Rønne Ørtved; Jane Brandt Sørensen; Brenda Sequeira Dmello; Thomas van den Akker; Monica Lauridsen Kujabi; Hussein Kidanto; Tarek Meguid; Ib Christian Bygbjerg; Jos van Roosmalen; Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch; Natasha Housseine Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Jane Brandt Sørensen; Natasha Housseine; Nanna Maaløe; Ib Christian Bygbjerg; Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl; Flemming Konradsen; Brenda Sequeira Dmello; Thomas van Den Akker; Jos van Roosmalen; Sangeeta Mookherji; Eunice Siaity; Haika Osaki; Rashid Saleh Khamis; Monica Lauridsen Kujabi; Thomas Wiswa John; Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch; Columba Mbekenga; Morten Skovdal; Hussein L Kidanto Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2022-12-31 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Nanna Maaløe; Natasha Housseine; Jane Brandt Sørensen; Josephine Obel; Brenda Sequeira DMello; Monica Lauridsen Kujabi; Haika Osaki; Thomas Wiswa John; Rashid Saleh Khamis; Zainab Suleiman Said Muniro; Daniel Joseph Nkungu; Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl; Flemming Konradsen; Sangeeta Mookherji; Columba Mbekenga; Tarek Meguid; Jos van Roosmalen; Ib Christian Bygbjerg; Thomas van den Akker; Andreas Kryger Jensen; Morten Skovdal; Hussein L Kidanto; Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2022-12-31 Impact factor: 2.996