Nana Shinozaki1, Xiaoyi Yuan1, Kentaro Murakami2, Satoshi Sasaki1,2. 1. Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarise the existing evidence of development, validation and current status of utilisation of dish-based dietary assessment tools. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Systematic search using PubMed and Web of Science. RESULTS: We identified twelve tools from seventy-four eligible publications. They were developed for Koreans (n 4), Bangladeshis (n 2), Iranians (n 1), Indians/Malays/Chinese (n 1), Japanese (n 3) and Chinese Americans (n 1). Most tools (10/12) were composed of a dish-based FFQ. Although the development process of a dish list varied among the tools, six studies classified mixed dishes based on the similarity of their characteristics such as food ingredients and cooking methods. Tools were validated against self-reported dietary information (n 9) and concentration biomarkers (n 1). In the eight studies assessing the differences between the tool and a reference, the mean (or median) intake of energy significantly differed in five studies, and 26-83 % of nutrients significantly differed in eight studies. Correlation coefficients for energy ranged from 0·15 to 0·87 across the thirteen studies, and the median correlation coefficients for nutrients ranged from 0·12 to 0·77. Dish-based dietary assessment tools were used in fifty-nine studies mainly to assess diet-disease relationships in target populations. CONCLUSIONS: Dish-based dietary assessment tools have exclusively been developed and used for Asian-origin populations. Further validation studies, particularly biomarker-based studies, are needed to assess the applicability of tools.
OBJECTIVE: To summarise the existing evidence of development, validation and current status of utilisation of dish-based dietary assessment tools. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Systematic search using PubMed and Web of Science. RESULTS: We identified twelve tools from seventy-four eligible publications. They were developed for Koreans (n 4), Bangladeshis (n 2), Iranians (n 1), Indians/Malays/Chinese (n 1), Japanese (n 3) and Chinese Americans (n 1). Most tools (10/12) were composed of a dish-based FFQ. Although the development process of a dish list varied among the tools, six studies classified mixed dishes based on the similarity of their characteristics such as food ingredients and cooking methods. Tools were validated against self-reported dietary information (n 9) and concentration biomarkers (n 1). In the eight studies assessing the differences between the tool and a reference, the mean (or median) intake of energy significantly differed in five studies, and 26-83 % of nutrients significantly differed in eight studies. Correlation coefficients for energy ranged from 0·15 to 0·87 across the thirteen studies, and the median correlation coefficients for nutrients ranged from 0·12 to 0·77. Dish-based dietary assessment tools were used in fifty-nine studies mainly to assess diet-disease relationships in target populations. CONCLUSIONS: Dish-based dietary assessment tools have exclusively been developed and used for Asian-origin populations. Further validation studies, particularly biomarker-based studies, are needed to assess the applicability of tools.
Authors: Pi-I D Lin; Sabri Bromage; Md Golam Mostofa; Joseph Allen; Emily Oken; Molly L Kile; David C Christiani Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-04-23 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Pi-I D Lin; Sabri Bromage; Md Golam Mostofa; Mohammad Rahman; Joseph Allen; Emily Oken; Molly L Kile; David C Christiani Journal: Environ Health Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 5.984