Literature DB >> 32757973

Investigating food insecurity measurement globally to inform practice locally: a rapid evidence review.

Emma Beacom1, Sinéad Furey1, Lynsey Hollywood2, Paul Humphreys3.   

Abstract

The objective of this review was to examine the methods used to measure food insecurity (FI) globally, to inform considerations relating to adopting a novel, or reviewing an existing, FI measurement approach in developed countries. Considerations for measurement are examined with particular applicability to the United Kingdom (UK) which has recently announced adoption of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) as an indicator to facilitate annual FI monitoring. This study uses a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodological approach to systematically review the literature on FI measurement and considers: geographical jurisdiction, methodological approach, sampling strategy, FI indicator(s) used, and implications for measurement. Results found that the majority of papers reviewed emanate from North America with the US Household Food Security Scale Module (HFSSM) and its various adapted forms being the most commonly reported indicator. FI is becoming a key concern within developed countries with a range of indicators being used to report on the severity of the issue. This paper provides a contribution to knowledge by: (i) identifying various approaches to FI measurement and commonalities of existing measurement approaches; (ii) providing a summation of the methodologies and findings of studies relating to FI measurement, and associated implications for measurement, (iii) providing a justification evidenced by the literature for the adoption of the HFSSM in the UK; and (iv) assessing the methodological usefulness of a REA review. Understanding the components of robust FI indicators and their effectiveness can help inform existing and novel measurement approaches to ensure that data collected on FI are meaningful and thereby useful to inform future policy work in this area.

Keywords:  Food insecurity; food poverty; inequality; measurement; rapid review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32757973     DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1798347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr        ISSN: 1040-8398            Impact factor:   11.176


  5 in total

1.  Classification Differences in Food Insecurity Measures between the United States and Canada: Practical Implications for Trend Monitoring and Health Research.

Authors:  Fei Men; Valerie Tarasuk
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Households' Food Insecurity and Its Association with Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors in Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi; Ayoub Al-Jawaldeh; Ali Albelbeisi; Samer Abuzerr; Ibrahim Elmadfa; Lara Nasreddine
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2022-03

3.  The Economic Perspective of Food Poverty and (In)security: An Analytical Approach to Measuring and Estimation in Italy.

Authors:  Stefano Marchetti; Luca Secondi
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults-A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Lindberg; Sarah A McNaughton; Gavin Abbott; Christina M Pollard; Amy L Yaroch; Katherine M Livingstone
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.706

5.  Food Insecurity May be an Independent Risk Factor Associated With Erectile Dysfunction in the United States: Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jiawei Chen; Liao Peng; Xiaoshuai Gao; Lede Lin; Yang Xiong; Fuxun Zhang; Yucheng Ma; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.523

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.