Literature DB >> 32757523

Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis.

Stephen L Hauser1, Amit Bar-Or1, Jeffrey A Cohen1, Giancarlo Comi1, Jorge Correale1, Patricia K Coyle1, Anne H Cross1, Jerome de Seze1, David Leppert1, Xavier Montalban1, Krzysztof Selmaj1, Heinz Wiendl1, Cecile Kerloeguen1, Roman Willi1, Bingbing Li1, Algirdas Kakarieka1, Davorka Tomic1, Alexandra Goodyear1, Ratnakar Pingili1, Dieter A Häring1, Krishnan Ramanathan1, Martin Merschhemke1, Ludwig Kappos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab, a subcutaneous anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, selectively depletes B cells. Teriflunomide, an oral inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis, reduces T-cell and B-cell activation. The relative effects of these two drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis are not known.
METHODS: In two double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive subcutaneous ofatumumab (20 mg every 4 weeks after 20-mg loading doses at days 1, 7, and 14) or oral teriflunomide (14 mg daily) for up to 30 months. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Secondary end points included disability worsening confirmed at 3 months or 6 months, disability improvement confirmed at 6 months, the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, the annualized rate of new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted MRI, serum neurofilament light chain levels at month 3, and change in brain volume.
RESULTS: Overall, 946 patients were assigned to receive ofatumumab and 936 to receive teriflunomide; the median follow-up was 1.6 years. The annualized relapse rates in the ofatumumab and teriflunomide groups were 0.11 and 0.22, respectively, in trial 1 (difference, -0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.16 to -0.06; P<0.001) and 0.10 and 0.25 in trial 2 (difference, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.09; P<0.001). In the pooled trials, the percentage of patients with disability worsening confirmed at 3 months was 10.9% with ofatumumab and 15.0% with teriflunomide (hazard ratio, 0.66; P = 0.002); the percentage with disability worsening confirmed at 6 months was 8.1% and 12.0%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = 0.01); and the percentage with disability improvement confirmed at 6 months was 11.0% and 8.1% (hazard ratio, 1.35; P = 0.09). The number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted MRI scan, the annualized rate of lesions on T2-weighted MRI, and serum neurofilament light chain levels, but not the change in brain volume, were in the same direction as the primary end point. Injection-related reactions occurred in 20.2% in the ofatumumab group and in 15.0% in the teriflunomide group (placebo injections). Serious infections occurred in 2.5% and 1.8% of the patients in the respective groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multiple sclerosis, ofatumumab was associated with lower annualized relapse rates than teriflunomide. (Funded by Novartis; ASCLEPIOS I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02792218 and NCT02792231.).
Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32757523     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  85 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review.

Authors:  Stephen L Hauser; Bruce A C Cree
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Antigen Presentation by B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Scott S Zamvil; Stephen L Hauser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Experimental laboratory biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Borros Arneth; Jörg Kraus
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  The Pharmacogenetics of Rituximab: Potential Implications for Anti-CD20 Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Michael Zhong; Anneke van der Walt; Maria Pia Campagna; Jim Stankovich; Helmut Butzkueven; Vilija Jokubaitis
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Human Herpesviruses 6A and 6B in Brain Diseases: Association versus Causation.

Authors:  Anthony L Komaroff; Philip E Pellett; Steven Jacobson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Early Aggressive Treatment Approaches for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Simpson; Ellen M Mowry; Scott D Newsome
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Infection Mitigation Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis Patients on Oral and Monoclonal Disease-Modifying Therapies.

Authors:  Tyler Ellis Smith; Ilya Kister
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Integrated analysis of differentially expressed genes and a ceRNA network to identify hub lncRNAs and potential drugs for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tianfeng Wang; Si Xu; Li Liu; Shuang Li; Huixue Zhang; Xiaoyu Lu; Xiaotong Kong; Danyang Li; Jianjian Wang; Lihua Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 9.  Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

Authors:  Giancarlo Comi; Amit Bar-Or; Hans Lassmann; Antonio Uccelli; Hans-Peter Hartung; Xavier Montalban; Per Solberg Sørensen; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Stephen L Hauser
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  B cells in multiple sclerosis - from targeted depletion to immune reconstitution therapies.

Authors:  Maria T Cencioni; Miriam Mattoscio; Roberta Magliozzi; Amit Bar-Or; Paolo A Muraro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.