Literature DB >> 32757365

Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes as postextubation respiratory support in preterm neonates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy1, Tapas Bandyopadhyay2, Debasish Nanda3, Prathik Bandiya4, Kiran More5, Vinod Idicula Oommen1, Amit Gupta1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) modalities are used for postextubation support in preterm neonates. Seven NRS modalities were compared-constant flow continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (CF-CPAP) (bubble CPAP; ventilator CPAP), variable flow CPAP (VF-CPAP), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), synchronized noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (S-NIPPV), nonsynchronized NIPPV (NS-NIPPV), bilevel CPAP (BiPAP), noninvasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation (nHFOV).
DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) using the Bayesian random-effects approach. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, WHO-ICTRP were searched. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation within 7 days of extubation.
RESULTS: A total of 33 studies with 4080 preterm neonates were included. S-NIPPV, NS-NIPPV, nHFOV, and VF-CPAP were more efficacious in preventing reintubation than CF-CPAP (risk ratio [RR] [95% credible intervals {CrI}]: 0.22 [0.12, 0.35]; 0.44 [0.27, 0.67]; 0.42 [0.18, 0.81]; 0.73 [0.52, 0.99]). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value ranked S-NIPPV to be the best postextubation intervention (SUCRA: 0.98). S-NIPPV was more effective than NS-NIPPV, BiPAP, VF-CPAP, and HFNC (RR [95% CrI]: 0.52 [0.24, 0.97]; 0.32 [0.14, 0.64]; 0.30 [0.16, 0.50]; 0.24 [0.12, 0.41]). NS-NIPPV resulted in lesser reintubation compared to VF-CPAP and HFNC (RR [95% CrI]: 0.61 [0.36, 0.97]; 0.49 [0.27, 0.80]). BiPAP, VF-CPAP, and HFNC had comparable efficacies. The overall quality of evidence was very low to moderate.
CONCLUSION: Results of this NMA indicate that S-NIPPV might be the most effective and CF-CPAP the least effective NRS modality for preventing extubation failure.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); neonatal pulmonary medicine; noninvasive ventilation; oxygenation and therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32757365     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  5 in total

1.  Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus bi-level positive pressure ventilation in premature infants with respiratory failure: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Wenqian Chen; Zhiqing Chen; Shuhua Lai; Wenhong Cai; Yunfeng Lin
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

2.  Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Very Preterm Infants Never Intubated During the First Neonatal Admission: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alejandro Avila-Alvarez; Fermín García-Muñoz Rodrigo; Gonzalo Solís-García; Sonia Pertega-Diaz; Manuel Sánchez Luna; Martin Iriondo-Sanz; Dolores Elorza Fernandez; Carlos Zozaya
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants-a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Soutrik Seth; Bijan Saha; Anindya Kumar Saha; Suchandra Mukherjee; Avijit Hazra
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Review of Current Evidence and Practices.

Authors:  Rajendra Prasad Anne; Srinivas Murki
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Nasal high-frequency jet ventilation (NHFJV) as a novel means of respiratory support in extremely low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Jessica Keel; Theodore De Beritto; Rangasamy Ramanathan; Rowena Cayabyab; Manoj Biniwale
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.521

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.