Literature DB >> 32757218

Changes of Laryngeal and Extralaryngeal Symptoms and Findings in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients.

Jérôme R Lechien1,2,3,4, Francois Bobin1,5, Vinciane Muls1,6, Francois Mouawad7, Giovanni Dapri1,2,8, Didier Dequanter1,4, Mihaela Horoi4, Marie-Paule Thill4, Alexandra Rodriguez Ruiz1,4, Sven Saussez1,2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the evolution of laryngeal and extralaryngeal symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) throughout a 3-month to 9-month treatment. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective Controlled Study.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven LPR patients and 123 healthy individuals were enrolled from four European hospitals. Patients were managed with a 3-month personalized treatment considering the LPR characteristics at the impedance-pH monitoring. Regarding the clinical therapeutic response, treatment was adapted for 3 to 6 additional months. Symptoms and findings were assessed throughout the therapeutic course with the Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) and the short version of the Reflux Sign Assessment (sRSA). The relationship between patient and reflux characteristics, symptoms, and findings was assessed.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one LPR patients completed the study. LPR patients exhibited more laryngeal and extralaryngeal symptoms and findings than healthy individuals. RSS significantly improved from baseline to 6 weeks posttreatment and continued to improve from 3 months to 6 months posttreatment. sRSA significantly improved from baseline to 3 months posttreatment. No further improvement was noted at 6 months posttreatment for pharyngeal and oral findings. Laryngeal findings continued to improve from 3 months to 6 months posttreatment. There was a significant association between patient stress level and RSS (P = .045). At 3 months posttreatment, 28.1% of patients had high or complete response, whereas 47.1% required 6 months or 9 months of treatment. Overall, 24.8% of patients had an LPR chronic course.
CONCLUSIONS: Laryngeal and extralaryngeal symptoms and findings significantly improved throughout treatment in LPR patients. The improvement of laryngeal findings was slower. Regarding the low prevalence of some digestive or otolaryngological symptoms, a short version of the RSS could be developed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1332-1342, 2021.
© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngopharyngeal; finding; laryngitis; outcome; reflux; sign; symptom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32757218     DOI: 10.1002/lary.28962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Acoustic measurements are useful therapeutic indicators of patients with dysphonia-related to reflux.

Authors:  Alexandra Rodriguez; Stéphane Hans; Jerome R Lechien; Sven Saussez; Géraldine Nowak; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Marta P Circiu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux may be acute, recurrent or chronic disease: preliminary observations.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Stéphane Hans; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Robin Baudouin; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 3.  Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A State-of-the-Art Algorithm Management for Primary Care Physicians.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Sven Saussez; Vinciane Muls; Maria R Barillari; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Stéphane Hans; Petros D Karkos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Bolus transit of upper esophageal sphincter on high-resolution impedance manometry study correlate with the laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Jia-Feng Wu; Wei-Chung Hsu; I-Jung Tsai; Tzu-Wei Tong; Yu-Cheng Lin; Chia-Hsiang Yang; Ping-Huei Tseng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Do Otolaryngologists Over- or Underestimate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Findings in Clinical Practice? A Comparison Study between the True Prevalence and the Otolaryngologist-Estimated Prevalence of Symptoms and Findings.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.