Literature DB >> 32756910

The evolutionary dynamics of venom toxins made by insects and other animals.

Andrew A Walker1.   

Abstract

Animal venoms are recognised as unique biological systems in which to study molecular evolution. Venom use has evolved numerous times among the insects, and insects today use venom to capture prey, defend themselves from predators, or to subdue and modulate host responses during parasitism. However, little is known about most insect venom toxins or the mode and tempo by which they evolve. Here, I review the evolutionary dynamics of insect venom toxins, and argue that insects offer many opportunities to examine novel aspects of toxin evolution. The key questions addressed are: How do venomous animals evolve from non-venomous animals, and how does this path effect the composition and pharmacology of the venom? What genetic processes (gene duplication, co-option, neofunctionalisation) are most important in toxin evolution? What kinds of selection pressures are acting on toxin-encoding genes and their cognate targets in envenomated animals? The emerging evidence highlights that venom composition and pharmacology adapts quickly in response to changing selection pressures resulting from new ecological interactions, and that such evolution occurs through a stunning variety of genetic mechanisms. Insects offer many opportunities to investigate the evolutionary dynamics of venom toxins due to their evolutionary history rich in venom-related adaptations, and their quick generation time and suitability for culture in the laboratory.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asilidae; Reduviidae; gene duplication; molecular evolution; neofunctionalisation; peptide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32756910     DOI: 10.1042/BST20190820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans        ISSN: 0300-5127            Impact factor:   5.407


  5 in total

1.  Production, composition, and mode of action of the painful defensive venom produced by a limacodid caterpillar, Doratifera vulnerans.

Authors:  Andrew A Walker; Samuel D Robinson; Jean-Paul V Paluzzi; David J Merritt; Samantha A Nixon; Christina I Schroeder; Jiayi Jin; Mohaddeseh Hedayati Goudarzi; Andrew C Kotze; Zoltan Dekan; Andy Sombke; Paul F Alewood; Bryan G Fry; Marc E Epstein; Irina Vetter; Glenn F King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bibliometric Analysis of Literature in Snake Venom-Related Research Worldwide (1933-2022).

Authors:  Fajar Sofyantoro; Donan Satria Yudha; Kenny Lischer; Tri Rini Nuringtyas; Wahyu Aristyaning Putri; Wisnu Ananta Kusuma; Yekti Asih Purwestri; Respati Tri Swasono
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Co-option of the same ancestral gene family gave rise to mammalian and reptilian toxins.

Authors:  Agneesh Barua; Ivan Koludarov; Alexander S Mikheyev
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  In Silico and In Vitro Structure-Activity Relationship of Mastoparan and Its Analogs.

Authors:  Prapenpuksiri Rungsa; Steve Peigneur; Nisachon Jangpromma; Sompong Klaynongsruang; Jan Tytgat; Sakda Daduang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Shedding Lights on Crude Venom from Solitary Foraging Predatory Ant Ectatomma opaciventre: Initial Toxinological Investigation.

Authors:  Lucas Ian Veloso Correia; Fernanda Van Petten de Vasconcelos Azevedo; Fernanda Gobbi Amorim; Sarah Natalie Cirilo Gimenes; Lorena Polloni; Mariana Alves Pereira Zoia; Mônica Soares Costa; Jéssica Peixoto Rodrigues; Kelly A Geraldo Yoneyama; Jean Carlos Santos; Eliane Candiani Arantes; Veridiana de Melo Rodrigues; Luiz Ricardo Goulart; Renata Santos Rodrigues
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.