S Harrison1, S Dorrington2,3, V Parsons1,4, S G S Shah1, I Madan1,4. 1. Occupational Health Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 2. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. 3. South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK. 4. Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the pattern of use of fit notes issued in secondary care settings. AIMS: To evaluate the pattern and quality of e-fit notes issued in an NHS Trust. METHODS: Anonymized data on patients admitted to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK) who had an e-fit note issued from 1 January to 31 August 2017 were analysed using descriptive statistical methods. Thematic analysis was used to group the free-text comments into distinct categories and themes. RESULTS: A total of 815 fit notes were issued during the study period. A total of 659 (81%) fit notes advised that patients were 'not fit' for work, whilst 156 (19%) advised that they 'may be fit' for work. The specialty with the highest proportion of patients assessed as may be fit was plastic surgery 46/104 (44%), whilst the lowest was ear, nose and throat surgery 0/57 (0%). The majority 151/156 (97%) of fit notes which advised that patients may be fit for work used the tick-box sections on the fit note to recommend work modifications. Of the free-text comments in section 4 of the 'may be fit' e-fit notes issued, 91/114 (80%) were related to the functional ability of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that doctors in secondary care are more willing to use the 'may be fit' option on the fit note than primary care practitioners. Most fit notes, which advised that a patient may be fit for work, suggested workplace modifications.
BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the pattern of use of fit notes issued in secondary care settings. AIMS: To evaluate the pattern and quality of e-fit notes issued in an NHS Trust. METHODS: Anonymized data on patients admitted to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK) who had an e-fit note issued from 1 January to 31 August 2017 were analysed using descriptive statistical methods. Thematic analysis was used to group the free-text comments into distinct categories and themes. RESULTS: A total of 815 fit notes were issued during the study period. A total of 659 (81%) fit notes advised that patients were 'not fit' for work, whilst 156 (19%) advised that they 'may be fit' for work. The specialty with the highest proportion of patients assessed as may be fit was plastic surgery 46/104 (44%), whilst the lowest was ear, nose and throat surgery 0/57 (0%). The majority 151/156 (97%) of fit notes which advised that patients may be fit for work used the tick-box sections on the fit note to recommend work modifications. Of the free-text comments in section 4 of the 'may be fit' e-fit notes issued, 91/114 (80%) were related to the functional ability of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that doctors in secondary care are more willing to use the 'may be fit' option on the fit note than primary care practitioners. Most fit notes, which advised that a patient may be fit for work, suggested workplace modifications.