Literature DB >> 32755355

Multicenter Multireader Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Attention Mapping System for the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Multiparametric MRI.

Sherif Mehralivand1,2,3, Stephanie A Harmon4, Joanna H Shih5, Clayton P Smith3, Nathan Lay3, Burak Argun6, Sandra Bednarova7, Ronaldo Hueb Baroni8, Abdullah Erdem Canda9, Karabekir Ercan10, Rossano Girometti7, Ercan Karaarslan11, Ali Riza Kural6, Andrei S Purysko12, Soroush Rais-Bahrami13,14,15, Victor Martins Tonso8, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi16, Jennifer B Gordetsky17,18, Ricardo Silvestre E Silva Macarenco19, Maria J Merino20, Berrak Gumuskaya21, Yesim Saglican22, Stefano Sioletic23, Anne Y Warren24, Tristan Barrett25, Leonardo Bittencourt26,27, Mehmet Coskun28, Chris Knauss29, Yan Mee Law30, Ashkan A Malayeri31, Daniel J Margolis32, Jamie Marko31, Derya Yakar33, Bradford J Wood34, Peter A Pinto2, Peter L Choyke3, Ronald M Summers35, Baris Turkbey3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a multicenter dataset the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) detection system with attention mapping compared with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) interpretation in the detection of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MRI examinations from five institutions were included in this study and were evaluated by nine readers. In the first round, readers evaluated mpMRI studies using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2. After 4 weeks, images were again presented to readers along with the AI-based detection system output. Readers accepted or rejected lesions within four AI-generated attention map boxes. Additional lesions outside of boxes were excluded from detection and categorization. The performances of readers using the mpMRI-only and AI-assisted approaches were compared. RESULTS. The study population included 152 case patients and 84 control patients with 274 pathologically proven cancer lesions. The lesion-based AUC was 74.9% for MRI and 77.5% for AI with no significant difference (p = 0.095). The sensitivity for overall detection of cancer lesions was higher for AI than for mpMRI but did not reach statistical significance (57.4% vs 53.6%, p = 0.073). However, for transition zone lesions, sensitivity was higher for AI than for MRI (61.8% vs 50.8%, p = 0.001). Reading time was longer for AI than for MRI (4.66 vs 4.03 minutes, p < 0.001). There was moderate interreader agreement for AI and MRI with no significant difference (58.7% vs 58.5%, p = 0.966). CONCLUSION. Overall sensitivity was only minimally improved by use of the AI system. Significant improvement was achieved, however, in the detection of transition zone lesions with use of the AI system at the cost of a mean of 40 seconds of additional reading time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; artificial intelligence; laparoscopic; multiparametric; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32755355      PMCID: PMC8974983          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Accuracy and agreement of PIRADSv2 for prostate cancer mpMRI: A multireader study.

Authors:  Matthew D Greer; Anna M Brown; Joanna H Shih; Ronald M Summers; Jamie Marko; Yan Mee Law; Sandeep Sankineni; Arvin K George; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Comparison of diagnostic performance between two prostate imaging reporting and data system versions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Wei Li; Chun Xin; Lanlan Zhang; Anding Dong; Haibing Xu; Yiman Wu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Jesse D Le; Nelly Tan; Eugene Shkolyar; David Y Lu; Lorna Kwan; Leonard S Marks; Jiaoti Huang; Daniel J A Margolis; Steven S Raman; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Daniel J Margolis; David Y Lu; Kevin G King; Jiaoti Huang; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Investigating the ability of multiparametric MRI to exclude significant prostate cancer prior to transperineal biopsy.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Tristan Barrett; Karan Wadhwa; Deepak Parashar; Julia Frey; Brendan C Koo; Anne Y Warren; Andrew Doble; Christof Kastner; Ferdia A Gallagher
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  The Problems with the Kappa Statistic as a Metric of Interobserver Agreement on Lesion Detection Using a Third-reader Approach When Locations Are Not Prespecified.

Authors:  Joanna H Shih; Matthew D Greer; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Association Between Surgical Skin Markings in Dermoscopic Images and Diagnostic Performance of a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network for Melanoma Recognition.

Authors:  Julia K Winkler; Christine Fink; Ferdinand Toberer; Alexander Enk; Teresa Deinlein; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Luc Thomas; Aimilios Lallas; Andreas Blum; Wilhelm Stolz; Holger A Haenssle
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Can computer-aided diagnosis assist in the identification of prostate cancer on prostate MRI? a multi-center, multi-reader investigation.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Nathan Lay; Stephanie A Harmon; Sreya Doddakashi; Sherif Mehralivand; Burak Argun; Tristan Barrett; Sandra Bednarova; Rossanno Girometti; Ercan Karaarslan; Ali Riza Kural; Aytekin Oto; Andrei S Purysko; Tatjana Antic; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Yesim Saglican; Stefano Sioletic; Anne Y Warren; Leonardo Bittencourt; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Ismail Kabakus; Yan Mee Law; Daniel J Margolis; Haytham Shebel; Antonio C Westphalen; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Ronald M Summers; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-18
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging.

Authors:  H M C Cheung; D Rubin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.389

Review 2.  Current Value of Biparametric Prostate MRI with Machine-Learning or Deep-Learning in the Detection, Grading, and Characterization of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Giacomo Aringhieri; Dania Cioni; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 3.  Developments in proton MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angeliki Stamatelatou; Tom W J Scheenen; Arend Heerschap
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Artificial intelligence in oncologic imaging.

Authors:  Melissa M Chen; Admir Terzic; Anton S Becker; Jason M Johnson; Carol C Wu; Max Wintermark; Christoph Wald; Jia Wu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 5.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 7.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Hunter; Sumeet Hindocha; Richard W Lee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.