Literature DB >> 32755208

Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.

Christopher S Lim1, Jorge Abreu-Gomez1,2, Ivan Carrion1, Nicola Schieda3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND. In PI-RADS version 2.1 (v2.1), atypical transition zone (TZ) nodules (homogeneous circumscribed nodules without full encapsulation) assigned category 2 can be upgraded to category 3 when showing markedly restricted diffusion. The prevalence of prostate cancer (PCa) in DWI-upgraded atypical nodules is unknown. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PCa in DWI-upgraded TZ atypical nodules and compare PCa diagnosis rate with that for conventional score 3 TZ nodules. METHODS. We retrospectively identified 104 consecutive cases of men who underwent MRI-directed transrectal ultrasound-guided targeted biopsy of 109 TZ category 3 or lower nodules performed between January 2015 and July 2018. Three radiologists who were blinded to the scores independently rescored lesions using PI-RADS v2.1. Agreement was assessed by Cohen kappa score. Consensus diagnosis was established by a second-round joint review. The number of TZ atypical nodules with or without DWI-upgraded and conventional score 3 TZ nodules were recorded and compared with targeted biopsy results including any PCa or clinically significant PCa (csPCa, defined as International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group ≥ 2) using chi-square analysis. RESULTS. There were 95 PI-RADS v2.1 category 3 (55 conventional T2-weighted MRI score 3 and 40 DWI-upgraded atypical nodules) and 14 category 2 or 1 nodules at consensus review with patient mean age of 64.8 ± 8.4 (SD) years, PSA of 10.6 ± 7.2 ng/mL, and nodule size of 15.1 ± 5.5 mm. Interobserver agreement ranged from slight to substantial for radiologists 1 and 2 (κ = 0.329), radiologists 1 and 3 (κ = 0.548), and radiologists 2 and 3 (κ = 0.652). From the 40 upgraded atypical nodules, 27.5% (11/40) had PCa and 7.5% (3/40) had csPCa (8 ISUP grade 1, 2 ISUP grade 2, 1 ISUP grade 3), compared with 43.6% (24/55) PCa and 20.0% (11/55) csPCa (13 ISUP grade 1, 6 ISUP grade 2, 3 ISUP grade 3, 2 ISUP grade 4) diagnosed in conventional T2-weighted score 3 nodules (p = .09 for csPCA and p = .11 for PCa). PCa was not diagnosed in any atypical nodule that was not upgraded on DWI. CONCLUSION. The prevalence of PCa in DWI-upgraded TZ atypical nodules was low (≈ 28% for any PCa and ≈ 8% for csPCa) and compared favorably to csPCa diagnosis rates in conventional TZ score 3 nodules. CLINICAL IMPACT. This study validates the DWI upgrade rule introduced in PI-RADS v2.1 for atypical nodules, which showed significant prostate cancer detection rates at targeted biopsy similar to those of conventional T2-weighted MRI TZ score 3 nodules.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PI-RADS; cancer; multiparametric MRI; prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32755208     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

Review 1.  PI-RADSv2.1: Current status.

Authors:  Stephanie M Walker; Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Structured reporting in radiologic education - Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies.

Authors:  Marietta Garmer; Julia Karpienski; Dietrich Hw Groenemeyer; Birgit Wagener; Lars Kamper; Patrick Haage
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version v2.1 for detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Wen; Yugang Ji; Jing Han; Xiaocui Shen; Yi Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  [PI-RADS 2.1 and structured reporting of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  Andreas Hötker; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 0.635

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.