| Literature DB >> 32755082 |
Shler Akram Faqe Mahmood1, Hawri Bakr Mustafa2.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to evaluate the infection rates of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii among asymptomatic individuals in Erbil City, northern Iraq. The research intent was to discover whether pathogenic or nonpathogenic species cause a high rate of symptomless Entamoeba infections. Stool samples were microscopically examined, and the 18S-rRNA gene was targeted utilizing the nested PCR technique in the positive specimens. Initial results based on morphological features showed that the Entamoeba prevalence rate was 7.4%. Significantly higher rates of infections were seen in females than in males and in low-income people than in moderate-income people. The incidence rates among the asymptomatic individuals, as determined by molecular analysis, were as follows: E. histolytica - 6%, E. dispar - 4.3%, and E. moshkovskii - 0.3%. Of all the Entamoeba positive samples, a single infection with E. histolytica was identified in 41.4% samples; the single infection with E. dispar in 18.6% samples, 35.7% samples had mixed infections with two Entamoeba species, and 4.3% had mixed infections with three species. The current study concluded that 7.4% of healthy people, who live in the endemic area under investigation, carry Entamoeba species asymptomatically. Additionally, the majority of asymptomatic Entamoeba infections were caused by the pathogenic E. histolytica (81.4%) compared to E. dispar (58.6%), and E. moshkovskii with the lowest rate of infection. Single and co-infections with E. histolytica and E. dispar were noted. E. moshkovskii, which was identified for the first time in the region, was only seen in mixed infections. The present study was conducted to evaluate the infection rates of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii among asymptomatic individuals in Erbil City, northern Iraq. The research intent was to discover whether pathogenic or nonpathogenic species cause a high rate of symptomless Entamoeba infections. Stool samples were microscopically examined, and the 18S-rRNA gene was targeted utilizing the nested PCR technique in the positive specimens. Initial results based on morphological features showed that the Entamoeba prevalence rate was 7.4%. Significantly higher rates of infections were seen in females than in males and in low-income people than in moderate-income people. The incidence rates among the asymptomatic individuals, as determined by molecular analysis, were as follows: E. histolytica – 6%, E. dispar – 4.3%, and E. moshkovskii – 0.3%. Of all the Entamoeba positive samples, a single infection with E. histolytica was identified in 41.4% samples; the single infection with E. dispar in 18.6% samples, 35.7% samples had mixed infections with two Entamoeba species, and 4.3% had mixed infections with three species. The current study concluded that 7.4% of healthy people, who live in the endemic area under investigation, carry Entamoeba species asymptomatically. Additionally, the majority of asymptomatic Entamoeba infections were caused by the pathogenic E. histolytica (81.4%) compared to E. dispar (58.6%), and E. moshkovskii with the lowest rate of infection. Single and co-infections with E. histolytica and E. dispar were noted. E. moshkovskii, which was identified for the first time in the region, was only seen in mixed infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32755082 PMCID: PMC7810119 DOI: 10.33073/pjm-2020-028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Microbiol ISSN: 1733-1331
Statistical analysis of the risk factors associated with microscopic positives for Entamoeba species and PCR positives for E. histolytica in asymptomatic subjects.
| Variants | Total frequency | Frequency and percentages of positive by microscopy | Percentage within each group | 95%CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | upper | |||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 524 (55.2%) | 29 (41.4%) | 524 (5.5%) | 0.036 | 0.075 | 0.018[ |
| Female | 426 (44.8%) | 41 (58.6%) | 426 (9.6%) | 0.069 | 0.125 | |
| Residency | ||||||
| Urban | 702 (73.9%) | 48 (68.6%) | 702 (6.8%) | 0.049 | 0.090 | 0.322 |
| Rural | 248 (26.1%) | 22 (31.4%) | 248 (8.9%) | 0.054 | 0.125 | |
| Age group | ||||||
| 15–18 | 87 (9.2%) | 4 (5.7%) | 87 (4.6%) | 0.009 | 0.090 | 0.76 |
| 19–25 | 311 (32.7%) | 24 (34.3%) | 311 (7.7%) | 0.048 | 0.108 | |
| 26–35 | 328 (34.5%) | 26 (37.1%) | 328 (7.9%) | 0.050 | 0.110 | |
| 36–45 | 157 (16.5%) | 13 (18.6%) | 157 (8.3%) | 0.00 | 0.100 | |
| > 45 | 67 (7.1%) | 3 (4.3%) | 67 (4.5%) | 0.00 | 0.308 | |
| Educational level | ||||||
| Primary school | 298 (31.4%) | 25 (35.7%) | 298 (8.4%) | 0.053 | 0.115 | 0.73 |
| Secondary and high school | 448 (47.2%) | 31 (44.3%) | 448 (6.9%) | 0.044 | 0.096 | |
| Bachelor | 204 (21.5%) | 14 (20%) | 204 (6.9%) | 0.036 | 0.107 | |
| Family size | ||||||
| 1–2 | 92 (9.7%) | 5 (7.1%) | 92 (5.4%) | 0.011 | 0.105 | 0.563 |
| 3–4 | 228 (24%) | 13 (18.6%) | 228 (5.7%) | 0.028 | 0.086 | |
| 5–6 | 301 (31.7%) | 24 (34.3%) | 301 (8%) | 0.050 | 0.112 | |
| > 6 | 329 (34.6%) | 28 (40%) | 329 (8.5%) | 0.055 | 0.116 | |
| Income status | ||||||
| Poor | 355 (37.4%) | 39 (55.7%) | 355 (11%) | 0.078 | 0.142 | 0.004[ |
| Middle class | 594 (62.5%) | 31 (44.3%) | 594 (5.2%) | 0.033 | 0.069 | |
| Wealthy | 1 (0.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Source of water supply | ||||||
| Chlorinated water | 646 (68%) | 39 (55.7%) | 646 (6%) | 0.042 | 0.079 | 0.062 |
| Well water | 302 (31.8%) | 31 (44.3%) | 302 (10.3%) | 0.068 | 0.138 | |
| Others | 2 (0.2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (0%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Eating out of home | ||||||
| Never | 259 (27.3%) | 17 (24.3%) | 259 (6.6%) | 0.039 | 0.096 | 0.857 |
| Sometimes | 310 (32.6%) | 24 (34.3%) | 310 (7.7%) | 0.045 | 0.110 | |
| Always | 381 (40.1%) | 29 (41.4%) | 381 (7.6%) | 0.050 | 0.104 | |
| History of taking medications | ||||||
| In the last 2 weeks | 140 (14.7%) | 6 (8.6%) | 140 (4.3%) | 0.013 | 0.075 | 0.161 |
| More than 2 weeks | 810 (85.3) | 64 (91.4%) | 810 (7.9%) | 0.059 | 0.098 | |
| Hygiene practice | ||||||
| Washing vegetables and fruits | 920 (96.8%) | 66 (94.3%) | 920 (7.2%) | 0.055 | 0.088 | 0.204 |
| Eating raw unwashed vegetables and fruits | 30 (3.2%) | 4 (5.7%) | 30 (13.3%) | 0.029 | 0.263 | |
presenting statistically significant differences < 0.05
Fig. 1.Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis for nested PCR products, using primers specific for E. histolytica, positive samples reveal 439 bp bands. Samples 1 to 55, 64,and 65 showed 439 bands; samples 56 to 63 and 66 to 70 tested negative for E. histolytica. Some of these negatives showed 900 bp bands, which are the product of the first PCR and an indicator for the presence of other Entamoeba species. C represented positive control, N represented negative control and M the 100 bp DNA marker.
Frequency and percentages of positive and negative results for E. histolytica, E. dispar and E. moshkovskii as single and mixed infections.
| Frequency & percentage of Positives by PCR per total (microscopic) positives | Frequency & percentage of Negatives by PCR per total (microscopic) positives | Frequency & percentage of positives per population | Frequency and percentage of single infection/positives | Frequency and percentage of mixed infection/positives | Frequency and percentage of single infection/total positives | Frequency and percentage of mixed infection/total positives | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 /70 (81.4%) | 13/70 (18.6%) | 57/950 (6%) | 29/57 (50.9%) | 28/57 (49.1%) | 29/70 (41.4%) | 28/70 (40%) | |
| 41/70 (58.6%) | 29/70 (41.4%) | 41/950 (4.3%) | 13/41 (31.7%) | 28/41 (68.3%) | 13/70 (18.6%) | 28/70 (40%) | |
| 3/70 (4.3%) | 67/70 (95.7%) | 3/950 (0.3%) | 0/3 (0%) | 3/3 (100%) | 0/70 (0%) | 3/70 (4.3%) |
Fig. 2.Detection of E. dispar after using species specific primers in the second round of the nested PCR; amplification products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and the stained gels were visualized under UV light. Positive samples exhibited 174 bp bands, which appeared in sample numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19,22, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31), (35 to 42), (56 to 63), and (66 to 70). Samples (4, 6, 9, 11, 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 26, 27, 32, 33, 34, 64, 65) and (43 to 55) tested negative for E. dispar. C represented positive control, N represented negative control and M was the 100 bp DNA marker.
Fig. 3.Nested PCR for identification of E. moshkovskii, determined with specific primers for each species, and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Positive samples amplifying 553 bp amplicon appeared in only three samples (1, 8, and 14); the remaining samples were negative. C represented positive control, N represented negativecontrol, and M was the 100 bp DNA marker.