G Rover1, C O de Lima2, F G Belladonna3, L F R Garcia1, E A Bortoluzzi1, E J N L Silva2,3,4, C S Teixeira1. 1. Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. 2. Department of Endodontics, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 3. Department of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. 4. Department of Endodontics, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the influence of the location and design of endodontic access cavities on root canal shaping and filling ability, pulp chamber cleaning and fracture resistance of extracted human mandibular incisors. METHODOLOGY: After pre-selection using periapical radiographs, forty extracted intact human mandibular incisors were scanned in a micro-computed tomographic device. The teeth were matched based on similar anatomical features of the canals and assigned to four experimental groups (n = 10) according to the endodontic access cavity and root canal preparation protocol: traditional/TRUShape (T/TRU); traditional/MTwo (T/MT); minimally invasive/TRUShape (MI/TRU); and minimally invasive/MTwo (MI/MT). The samples were scanned after root canal instrumentation and filling procedures. The parameters evaluated were as follows: volume and area of the root canal, noninstrumented canal areas, canal transportation and centring ratio, accumulated hard tissue debris, voids in root canal fillings and remnants of root canal filling materials in the pulp chamber. After root canal filling and cavity restoration procedures, the samples were submitted to a fracture resistance test. Data were statistically analysed using Shapiro-Wilk, one-way anova and Bonferroni tests with a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There was no difference regarding all parameters evaluated before and after root canal preparation (volume and area of the root canal, noninstrumented canal areas, canal transportation and centring ratio, and accumulated hard tissue debris) amongst the groups (P > 0.05). MI/TRU and MI/MT groups were associated with significantly more voids in root canal fillings when compared to the T/TRU and T/MT groups (P < 0.05). Percentage of root canal filling material remnants in the pulp chamber after cleaning procedures and mean fracture resistance values were not significantly different amongst the four experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The location and design of the endodontic access cavity did not impact on root canal preparation nor resistance to fracture of extracted mandibular incisors, regardless of the instrument used. Minimally invasive access cavities were associated with significantly more voids in root canal fillings.
AIM: To evaluate the influence of the location and design of endodontic access cavities on root canal shaping and filling ability, pulp chamber cleaning and fracture resistance of extracted human mandibular incisors. METHODOLOGY: After pre-selection using periapical radiographs, forty extracted intact human mandibular incisors were scanned in a micro-computed tomographic device. The teeth were matched based on similar anatomical features of the canals and assigned to four experimental groups (n = 10) according to the endodontic access cavity and root canal preparation protocol: traditional/TRUShape (T/TRU); traditional/MTwo (T/MT); minimally invasive/TRUShape (MI/TRU); and minimally invasive/MTwo (MI/MT). The samples were scanned after root canal instrumentation and filling procedures. The parameters evaluated were as follows: volume and area of the root canal, noninstrumented canal areas, canal transportation and centring ratio, accumulated hard tissue debris, voids in root canal fillings and remnants of root canal filling materials in the pulp chamber. After root canal filling and cavity restoration procedures, the samples were submitted to a fracture resistance test. Data were statistically analysed using Shapiro-Wilk, one-way anova and Bonferroni tests with a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There was no difference regarding all parameters evaluated before and after root canal preparation (volume and area of the root canal, noninstrumented canal areas, canal transportation and centring ratio, and accumulated hard tissue debris) amongst the groups (P > 0.05). MI/TRU and MI/MT groups were associated with significantly more voids in root canal fillings when compared to the T/TRU and T/MT groups (P < 0.05). Percentage of root canal filling material remnants in the pulp chamber after cleaning procedures and mean fracture resistance values were not significantly different amongst the four experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The location and design of the endodontic access cavity did not impact on root canal preparation nor resistance to fracture of extracted mandibular incisors, regardless of the instrument used. Minimally invasive access cavities were associated with significantly more voids in root canal fillings.