| Literature DB >> 32754678 |
Sara Darbandi1, Mahsa Darbandi1, Ashok Agarwal2, Hamid Reza Khorram Khorshid3, Mohammad Reza Sadeghi1, Sandro C Esteves4, Pallav Sengupta5, Sulagna Dutta5, Zohreh Fathi1, Hojjat Zeraati6, Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The three-parent assisted reproductive technique may increase oocyte competence.Entities:
Keywords: In vitro oocyte maturation techniques; Nuclear transfer techniques; Oocyte donation.; Oocytes; Assisted reproductive techniques
Year: 2020 PMID: 32754678 PMCID: PMC7340984 DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i6.7284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed ISSN: 2476-3772
Descriptive and comparative statistics of different methods utilized for improving the fertilization and developmental potential of human aged NSN-GV oocytes
| Wilcoxon was used for pairwise comparison between groups. Here, four groups of B, C, D and E were compared. Group A has been removed due to lack of changes and only has only been descripted in the text. The data were reported as a percentage. In this table, nine parameters related to the fertilization, and developmental potential of oocytes including fusion, MI, MII, ICSI, PN, cleavage, 2-cell, 4-cell, and 8-cell were compared between groups. For analyzing and comparing the data, the Kaplan-Meire and Log rank were used for the evaluation of survival function in the nine developmental stages. The P-value of comparing “survival rates” between groups have been shown in the last column of this table. *P |
Life table of different methods utilized for improving the fertilization and developmental potential of human aged NSN-GV oocytes
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
|
| 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.42 |
|
| 0.42 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
|
| 0.50 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.00 | - - | - - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.58 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | |
|
| 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.08 | - - | - - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.82 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | - |
|
| 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 2.00 | - - | - - | - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| 26 | 20 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
|
| 12 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
|
| 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
|
| 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 1.00 | - - | - - | - | ||
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
|
| 1.00 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
|
| 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | - |
|
| 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.00 | - - | - - | - | ||
| The Kaplan-Meire and Log-rank were used for the evaluation of survival function in nine developmental stages including Fusion, MI, MII, ICSI, PN, Cleavage, 2-cell, 4-cell, and 8-cell. Here, four groups of B, C, D, and E were compared. Group A has been removed due to the lack of changes and has only been described in the text. Group A, germinal vesicle transfer (GVT); Group B, synchronous ooplasmic transfer (sOT); Group C, asynchronous ooplasmic transfer using cryopreserved MII oocyte (caOT); Group D, asynchronous ooplasmic transfer using waste MII oocyte (waOT); Group E, control group. ICSI, Intra cytoplasmic sperm injection; PN, pronuclear; NSN, not surrounded nucleolus; SN, surrounded nucleolus. Cumulative proportion surviving at the end of interval: the proportion of the cell surviving until the end of the developmental stage; Proportion surviving: the proportion of NSN-GV oocytes which survived during development; Proportion terminating: the proportion of NSN-GV oocytes which died; Number entering interval: the denominator cell number for each time interval | |||||||||