| Literature DB >> 32754510 |
Nitin Kumar Joshi1, Pankaj Bhardwaj2, Praveen Suthar3, Yogesh Kumar Jain4, Vibha Joshi5, Balwant Manda6.
Abstract
CONTEXT: e-Health programs are implemented assuming that e-health/digital health can prove beneficial but pieces of evidence for assessing the actual benefits of e-health programs are lacking. AIMS: To utilize the benefit evaluation (BE) framework to assess Asha Soft, which is an online payment and performance monitoring system initiative taken by Rajasthan. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Asha Soft; benefit evaluation; e-health initiative; monitoring; online payment; performance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32754510 PMCID: PMC7380815 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_48_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Framework used for conducting scoping study
| Stages | Strategy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stage-1 | Identifying the research question | Broad search strategy with clearly defined concepts and continuous refinement based on |
| Knowledge obtained from the existing literature about monitoring and online payment system (Asha Soft) in Rajasthan | ||
| Stage-2 | Identifying relevant studies/documents | Search for research evidence via different sources (peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature) |
| Stage-3 | Study selection | Inclusion and exclusion criteria developed post hoc, after gaining familiarity with the literature |
| Stage-4 | Data charting | Sifting, charting, and sorting material as per key issues and themes for interpreting data. |
| dimensions of benefit evaluation framework narrative/descriptive approach | ||
| Stage-5 | Summarizing and presenting results | An analytic or thematic framework to guide the narrative account of existing literature based on the benefit evaluation framework. |
| Stage-6 | Consultation exercise | To provide valuable insights and “added value” to the literature review. Key informants feedback interviews |
Summary of benefit evaluation (BE) measures adopted from the handbook of e-health evaluation (University of Columbia, 2016).[6]
| Dimension | Category | Details |
|---|---|---|
| System | Functionality, Performance, Security | Type of features available |
| Level of features available | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| Reliability | ||
| System response time | ||
| Information | Content, Availability | Accuracy and relevance |
| Completeness and comprehensiveness | ||
| Timeliness, reliability, and consistency of data | ||
| Service | Responsiveness | Extent and adequacy of implementation |
| Training and ongoing support availability | ||
| Use | User behavior and pattern, Self-reported use, Intention to use | Type, frequency, duration, location, and flexibility of actual and perceived usage |
| Satisfaction | Competency, User satisfaction, Ease of use | User knowledge, skills, and experience |
| Extent of user gratification | ||
| User-friendliness and learnability | ||
| Net benefits | Care quality, Access, Productivity | Risk management, monitoring, and overall safety |
| Appropriateness and effectiveness | ||
| Health outcomes, ability of patients, and providers to access services | ||
| Efficiency, care coordination, and net cost |