Literature DB >> 32753562

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: an international survey of peri-operative practice.

Geetu Prakash Bhandoria1, Prashant Bhandarkar2, Vijay Ahuja3, Amita Maheshwari4, Rupinder K Sekhon5, Murat Gultekin6, Ali Ayhan7, Fuat Demirkiran8, Ilker Kahramanoglu8, Yee-Loi Louise Wan9, Pawel Knapp10, Jakub Dobroch11, Andrzej Zmaczyński12, Robert Jach13, Gregg Nelson14.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in gynecologic oncology, with the majority of published reports originating from a small number of specialized centers. It is unclear to what degree ERAS is implemented in hospitals globally. This international survey investigated the status of ERAS protocol implementation in open gynecologic oncology surgery to provide a worldwide perspective on peri-operative practice patterns.
METHODS: Requests to participate in an online survey of ERAS practices were distributed via social media (WhatsApp, Twitter, and Social Link). The survey was active between January 15 and March 15, 2020. Additionally, four national gynecologic oncology societies agreed to distribute the study among their members. Respondents were requested to answer a 17-item questionnaire about their ERAS practice preferences in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods.
RESULTS: Data from 454 respondents representing 62 countries were analyzed. Overall, 37% reported that ERAS was implemented at their institution. The regional distribution was: Europe 38%, Americas 33%, Asia 19%, and Africa 10%. ERAS gynecologic oncology guidelines were well adhered to (>80%) in the domains of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, early removal of urinary catheter after surgery, and early introduction of ambulation. Areas with poor adherence to the guidelines included the use of bowel preparation, adoption of modern fasting guidelines, carbohydrate loading, use of nasogastric tubes and peritoneal drains, intra-operative temperature monitoring, and early feeding.
CONCLUSION: This international survey of ERAS in open gynecologic oncology surgery shows that, while some practices are consistent with guideline recommendations, many practices contradict the established evidence. Efforts are required to decrease the variation in peri-operative care that exists in order to improve clinical outcomes for patients with gynecologic cancer globally. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gynecologic surgical procedures; ovarian cancer; postoperative care; postoperative complications; surgical procedures, operative

Year:  2020        PMID: 32753562     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  8 in total

1.  ERAS: An Audit of Existing Practices.

Authors:  Karthik C Bassetty; Dhanya Susan Thomas; Ajit Sebastian; Anitha Thomas; Rachel Chandy; Abraham Peedicayil; Vinotha Thomas
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 2.  Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Janita Pak Chun Chau; Xu Liu; Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo; Wai Tong Chien; Sze Ki Hui; Kai Chow Choi; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Geetu Bhandoria; Sohan Lal Solanki; Mrugank Bhavsar; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Cherukuri Bapuji; Nitin Bhorkar; Prashant Bhandarkar; Sameer Bhosale; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Anik Ghosh; Vikas Mahajan; Abraham Peedicayil; Praveen Nath; Snita Sinukumar; Robin Thambudorai; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Aditi Bhatt
Journal:  Pleura Peritoneum       Date:  2021-06-21

Review 4.  WhatsApp Messenger use in oncology: a narrative review on pros and contras of a flexible and practical, non-specific communication tool.

Authors:  Vittorio Gebbia; Dario Piazza; Maria Rosaria Valerio; Alberto Firenze
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Evaluation of perioperative management of advanced ovarian (tubal/peritoneal) cancer patients: a survey from MITO-MaNGO Groups.

Authors:  Stefano Greggi; Francesca Falcone; Giovanni D Aletti; Marco Cascella; Francesca Bifulco; Nicoletta Colombo; Sandro Pignata
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 6.  The International Collaboration for Research methods Development in Oncology (CReDO) workshops: shaping the future of global oncology research.

Authors:  Priya Ranganathan; Girish Chinnaswamy; Manju Sengar; Durga Gadgil; Shivakumar Thiagarajan; Balram Bhargava; Christopher M Booth; Marc Buyse; Sanjiv Chopra; Chris Frampton; Satish Gopal; Nick Grant; Mark Krailo; Ruth Langley; Prashant Mathur; Xavier Paoletti; Mahesh Parmar; Arnie Purushotham; Douglas Pyle; Preetha Rajaraman; Martin R Stockler; Richard Sullivan; Soumya Swaminathan; Ian Tannock; Edward Trimble; Rajendra A Badwe; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 54.433

7.  Perioperative Care in Colorectal Cancer Surgery before a Structured Implementation Program of the ERAS Protocol in a Regional Network. The Piemonte EASY-NET Project.

Authors:  Luca Pellegrino; Eva Pagano; Marco Ettore Allaix; Mario Morino; Andrea Muratore; Paolo Massucco; Federica Rinaldi; Giovannino Ciccone; Felice Borghi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31

8.  Evaluation of the Implementation of Multiple Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways Across a Provincial Health Care System in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Gregg Nelson; Xiaoming Wang; Alison Nelson; Peter Faris; Laura Lagendyk; Tracy Wasylak; Oliver F Bathe; David Bigam; Erin Bruce; W Donald Buie; Michael Chong; Adrian Fairey; M Eric Hyndman; Anthony MacLean; Michael McCall; Sophia Pin; Haili Wang; Leah Gramlich
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.