Literature DB >> 32750661

KRAS mutation as a prognostic factor and predictive factor in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Rebecca Ellen Goulding1, Matthew Chenoweth1, Gebra Cuyun Carter2, Mark Ernest Boye3, Kristin M Sheffield3, William J John3, Mark Steven Leusch3, Catherine Elizabeth Muehlenbein3, Li Li3, Min-Hua Jen3, Adina Rojubally1, Jeroen Jansen1, Eric Druyts4.   

Abstract

KRAS (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) is the most common oncogenic mutation detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of KRAS as either a prognostic factor or predictive factor (modifier of treatment effects) in NSCLC is not well established at this time. This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis synthesized the available evidence regarding the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor and/or prognostic factor of survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic (stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC. Relevant clinical trials and observational studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Meta-analyses were performed using data extracted from multivariable and univariable analyses from clinical studies to assess the empirical evidence of KRAS mutation status as a prognostic or/and predicitive factor. 43 selected studies were identified by the SLR and included in this meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not demonstrate a significant prognostic effect of mutant KRAS on overall survival (OS) (HR=1.10; 95% CI [0.88, 1.38]) or progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.03; 95% CI [0.80, 1.33]). However, when conducting meta-analyses on HRs reported in observational studies, a statistically significant negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS was observed (OS HR=1.71; 95% CI [1.07, 2.84]; PFS HR=1.18; 95% CI [1.02, 1.36]). Meta-analyses of objective response rate (ORR) in RCTs demonstrated a negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS (RR=0.38; 95% CI [0.16, 0.63]). Limited data were available to evaluate the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor. In conclusion, this research offers evidence that KRAS mutation may be a negative prognostic factor for survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, but further research is needed to address conflicting results on the importance of KRAS mutations as a predictive factor.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effect modifier; KRAS mutations; Meta-analysis; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Predictive factors; Prognosis; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32750661     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun        ISSN: 2468-2942


  10 in total

1.  Detection of KRAS G12/G13 Mutations in Cell Free-DNA by Droplet Digital PCR, Offers Prognostic Information for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Kleita Michaelidou; Chara Koutoulaki; Konstantinos Mavridis; Eleftherios Vorrias; Maria A Papadaki; Anastasios V Koutsopoulos; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Sofia Agelaki
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 2.  Targeting KRAS in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Elena Corral de la Fuente; Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia; Ana Gomez Rueda; Yolanda Lage; Pilar Garrido
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Targeting KRAS Mutant in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Novel Insights Into Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Désage; Camille Léonce; Aurélie Swalduz; Sandra Ortiz-Cuaran
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Daily Practice Assessment of KRAS Status in NSCLC Patients: A New Challenge for the Thoracic Pathologist Is Right around the Corner.

Authors:  Christophe Bontoux; Véronique Hofman; Patrick Brest; Marius Ilié; Baharia Mograbi; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Direct Targeting KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Resistance.

Authors:  Damien Reita; Lucile Pabst; Erwan Pencreach; Eric Guérin; Laurent Dano; Valérie Rimelen; Anne-Claire Voegeli; Laurent Vallat; Céline Mascaux; Michèle Beau-Faller
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with a KRAS G12C Mutation: A Real-World Study.

Authors:  Oliver Illini; Hannah Fabikan; Maximilian Johannes Hochmair; Christoph Weinlinger; Dagmar Krenbek; Luka Brcic; Ulrike Setinek; Angelika Terbuch; Gudrun Absenger; Selma Konjić; Arschang Valipour
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Adenocarcinoma: First Documented Report in the Arabian Gulf.

Authors:  Abdullah S Alsulaiman; Siraj B Alharthi; Ahmed S Albariqi; Rasha A Mutabaqani; Fawzi F Bokhari; Islam M Tayeb; Dalia R Alharthi; Muhammad U Tariq; Yasser H Babaier
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 8.  The Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Chemotherapy for KRAS-Mutant or EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Ling Li; Sheng Cheng; Junxian Yu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  KRAS-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Past Efforts to Future Challenges.

Authors:  Serena Ceddia; Lorenza Landi; Federico Cappuzzo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 10.  Targeting KRAS in Solid Tumors: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities of Novel KRAS Inhibitors.

Authors:  Alice Indini; Erika Rijavec; Michele Ghidini; Alessio Cortellini; Francesco Grossi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.