Sylvain Chawki1, Albert Buchard2, Hamza Sakhi3, Karim Dardim4, Karim El Sakhawi3, Mokhtar Chawki5, Henri Boulanger6, Tomek Kofman7, Djamal Dahmane3, Philippe Rieu8, David Attaf9, Salima Ahriz-Saksi6, Frederic Besson10, Remy Boula10, Ali Hafi10, Afshin Massoumi7, Ali Zineddine Diddaoui5, Luc Fromentin5, Patrick Michaut11, Rachida Nebbad12, Jean-François Desassis13, Laurence Nicolet13, Abderrahmane Ghazali14, Julie Sohier-Attias15, Larbi Lamriben16, Arezki Adem16, Emmanuel Dupuis17, Mohamad-Khair Rifard18, Dominique Joly19, Khalil El Karoui20, Philippe Attias8. 1. Institut Universitaire d'hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Unité U944, Paris, France. 2. BIOS Health, Cambridge, UK. 3. AP-HP, Department of Nephrology, Hôpital henri Mondor, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) Unité U955, Créteil, France. 4. Association Limousine pour l'Utilisation du Rein artificiel à domicile (ALURAD), Isle, France. 5. Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Clinique Claude Bernard, Ermont, France. 6. Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Clinique de l'Estrée, Stains, France. 7. ANDRA, Paris, France. 8. Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Hôpital Privé Nord Parisien, Sarcelles, France. 9. FRESENIUS, Paris, France. 10. Clinique Lambert, Dialysis, La Garenne-Colombes, France. 11. Clinique Internationale du Parc Monceau, Nephrology and Dialysis, Paris, France. 12. Centre d'autodialyse le Figuier, Drancy, France. 13. Centre Edouard Rist, Nephrology and Dialysis, Paris, France. 14. Groupe Hospitalier Public Sud de l'Oise, Dialysis, Creil, France. 15. Centre de Néphrologie Suppléance à l'insuffisance rénale par des techniques autonomes (SIRTA), Argenteuil, France. 16. Clinique les Martinets, Dialysis, Rueil Malmaison, France. 17. American Hospital of Paris, Nephrology and Dialysis, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. 18. Centre Hospitalier des Quatre Villes, Nephrology and dialysis, Saint Cloud, France. 19. Assistance publique - hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Department of Adult Nephrology, Paris, France. 20. AP-HP, Department of Nephrology, Hôpital henri Mondor, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) Unité U955, Créteil, France. Electronic address: khalil.el-karoui@inserm.fr.
To the editor:We retrospectively studied 248 patients on maintenance hemodialysis affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in 19 private and academic maintenance hemodialysis centers in the Paris, France, area.The mean follow-up period was 40 ± 19 days. The hospitalization rate was 58%. The overall mortality was 18.1% (30% in hospitalized patients) (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Ninety-six patients (39%) were previously treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. By multivariate analysis (Table 1
), the main risk factors associated with mortality were age, facility living, dyspnea, and previous immunosuppressive treatment. Average treatment effects were further analyzed by propensity score analysis (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table S3). Hydroxychloroquine (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6–1.71; P = 0.95), macrolides (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.94–2.84; P = 0.079), and third-generation cephalosporins (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.8–2.29; P = 0.265) had no significant effect on mortality. Conversely, previous immunosuppressive treatment was associated with increased mortality (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.43–5.01; P = 0.002), and previous treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers was associated with reduced mortality (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31–0.85; P = 0.01).
Table 1
Multivariate analysis of the risk of death (outcome)
Variable
OR (95% CI)
P
Characteristics
Age
1.04 (1.01–1.09)
0.029
Facility living
17.29 (3.95–75.6)
<0.001
Comorbidities
Chronic respiratory failure
7.47 (1.18–47.39)
0.03
Immunosuppressive therapy
8.32 (2.19–31.55)
0.002
Symptoms at diagnosis
Dyspnea
3.14 (1.24–7.96)
0.015
Blood tests
Procalcitonin
1.005 (0.99–1.0107)
0.065
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
P values in bold are considered as statistically significant.
Multivariate analysis of the risk of death (outcome)CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.P values in bold are considered as statistically significant.In this large cohort of patients on maintenance hemodialysis, we highlight the deleterious role of previous immunosuppressive therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 outcome. These data are in line with those observed in patients who had undergone kidney transplantation, who demonstrate a high mortality rate (∼20%–30%).Moreover, since angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is the receptor for viral cellular entry, a role for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers has been suggested in coronavirus disease 2019 pathophysiology. In our cohort, these treatments were associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk after propensity score weighting. However, large retrospective studies have not confirmed the impact of these treatments on severity of coronavirus disease 2019
,
in the general population. Further studies of cellular angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression in patients on maintenance hemodialysis could explain this effect since decreased angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity has been reported in this population.5, 6, 7
Authors: Dalvir Kular; Irina Chis Ster; Alexander Sarnowski; Eirini Lioudaki; Dandisonba C B Braide-Azikiwe; Martin L Ford; David Makanjuola; Alexandra Rankin; Hugh Cairns; Joyce Popoola; Nicholas Cole; Mysore Phanish; Richard Hull; Pauline A Swift; Debasish Banerjee Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2020-09-10