Literature DB >> 32750459

Treatment impact on COVID-19 evolution in hemodialysis patients.

Sylvain Chawki1, Albert Buchard2, Hamza Sakhi3, Karim Dardim4, Karim El Sakhawi3, Mokhtar Chawki5, Henri Boulanger6, Tomek Kofman7, Djamal Dahmane3, Philippe Rieu8, David Attaf9, Salima Ahriz-Saksi6, Frederic Besson10, Remy Boula10, Ali Hafi10, Afshin Massoumi7, Ali Zineddine Diddaoui5, Luc Fromentin5, Patrick Michaut11, Rachida Nebbad12, Jean-François Desassis13, Laurence Nicolet13, Abderrahmane Ghazali14, Julie Sohier-Attias15, Larbi Lamriben16, Arezki Adem16, Emmanuel Dupuis17, Mohamad-Khair Rifard18, Dominique Joly19, Khalil El Karoui20, Philippe Attias8.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32750459      PMCID: PMC7395814          DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor: We retrospectively studied 248 patients on maintenance hemodialysis affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in 19 private and academic maintenance hemodialysis centers in the Paris, France, area. The mean follow-up period was 40 ± 19 days. The hospitalization rate was 58%. The overall mortality was 18.1% (30% in hospitalized patients) (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Ninety-six patients (39%) were previously treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. By multivariate analysis (Table 1 ), the main risk factors associated with mortality were age, facility living, dyspnea, and previous immunosuppressive treatment. Average treatment effects were further analyzed by propensity score analysis (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table S3). Hydroxychloroquine (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6–1.71; P = 0.95), macrolides (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.94–2.84; P = 0.079), and third-generation cephalosporins (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.8–2.29; P = 0.265) had no significant effect on mortality. Conversely, previous immunosuppressive treatment was associated with increased mortality (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.43–5.01; P = 0.002), and previous treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers was associated with reduced mortality (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31–0.85; P = 0.01).
Table 1

Multivariate analysis of the risk of death (outcome)

VariableOR (95% CI)P
Characteristics
 Age1.04 (1.01–1.09)0.029
 Facility living17.29 (3.95–75.6)<0.001
Comorbidities
 Chronic respiratory failure7.47 (1.18–47.39)0.03
 Immunosuppressive therapy8.32 (2.19–31.55)0.002
Symptoms at diagnosis
 Dyspnea3.14 (1.24–7.96)0.015
Blood tests
 Procalcitonin1.005 (0.99–1.0107)0.065

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

P values in bold are considered as statistically significant.

Multivariate analysis of the risk of death (outcome) CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. P values in bold are considered as statistically significant. In this large cohort of patients on maintenance hemodialysis, we highlight the deleterious role of previous immunosuppressive therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 outcome. These data are in line with those observed in patients who had undergone kidney transplantation, who demonstrate a high mortality rate (∼20%–30%). Moreover, since angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is the receptor for viral cellular entry, a role for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers has been suggested in coronavirus disease 2019 pathophysiology. In our cohort, these treatments were associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk after propensity score weighting. However, large retrospective studies have not confirmed the impact of these treatments on severity of coronavirus disease 2019 , in the general population. Further studies of cellular angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression in patients on maintenance hemodialysis could explain this effect since decreased angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity has been reported in this population.5, 6, 7
  9 in total

1.  The Characteristics, Dynamics, and the Risk of Death in COVID-19 Positive Dialysis Patients in London, UK.

Authors:  Dalvir Kular; Irina Chis Ster; Alexander Sarnowski; Eirini Lioudaki; Dandisonba C B Braide-Azikiwe; Martin L Ford; David Makanjuola; Alexandra Rankin; Hugh Cairns; Joyce Popoola; Nicholas Cole; Mysore Phanish; Richard Hull; Pauline A Swift; Debasish Banerjee
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 2.  The frail world of haemodialysis patients in the COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Gaetano Alfano; Annachiara Ferrari; Riccardo Magistroni; Francesco Fontana; Gianni Cappelli; Carlo Basile
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Continuing arteriovenous fistula creation by nephrologist and its outcome during COVID pandemic-Analysis of 376 cases.

Authors:  Himansu Sekhar Mahapatra; Renju Binoy; Neeraj Anant Inamdar; Kushal D P; Adarsh Kumar; Navjot Kaur; Mansi Singh; Anamika Kumari; Chandra Krishna; Muthukumar Balkrishna; Lalit Pursnani
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.886

4.  Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Considering Shared Chairs in Outpatient Dialysis: A Real-World Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ravi Thadhani; Joanna Willetts; Catherine Wang; John Larkin; Hanjie Zhang; Lemuel Rivera Fuentes; Len Usvyat; Kathleen Belmonte; Yuedong Wang; Robert Kossmann; Jeffrey Hymes; Peter Kotanko; Franklin Maddux
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Long-term impact of COVID-19 among maintenance haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Chawki; Albert Buchard; Hamza Sakhi; Karim Dardim; Karim El Sakhawi; Mokhtar Chawki; Henri Boulanger; Tomek Kofman; Djamal Dahmane; Philippe Rieu; David Attaf; Salima Ahriz-Saksi; Afshin Masoumi; Ali Zineddine Diddaoui; Luc Fromentin; Patrick Michaut; Rachida Nebbad; Jean-François Desassis; Laurence Nicolet; Julie Sohier-Attias; Frederic Besson; Remy Boula; Ali Hafi; Abderrahmane Ghazali; Larbi Lamriben; Adem Arezki; Emmanuel Dupuis; Mohamad-Khair Rifard; Dominique Joly; Philippe Attias; Khalil El Karoui
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-09-27

Review 6.  COVID-19 in dialysis: clinical impact, immune response, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Khalil El Karoui; An S De Vriese
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 18.998

7.  SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers.

Authors:  Henri Boulanger; Salima Ahriz Saksi; Jedjiga Achiche; Florence Batusanski; Nicolas Stawiarski; Ali Diddaoui; Luc Fromentin; Mokhtar Chawki
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Presentation and outcomes of chronic kidney disease patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Carolina Gonçalves Branco; Inês Duarte; Joana Gameiro; Cláudia Costa; Filipe Marques; João Oliveira; João Bernardo; José Nuno Fonseca; Carolina Carreiro; Sandra Braz; José António Lopes
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep

9.  Kinetics of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection.

Authors:  Hamza Sakhi; Djamal Dahmane; Philippe Attias; Thomas Kofman; Magali Bouvier; Nathanael Lapidus; Slim Fourati; Khalil El Karoui
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 10.121

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.