| Literature DB >> 32750222 |
Gao-Bo Lv1, Ting-Ting Wang2, Hai-Lin Zhu3, Hong-Ke Wang4, Wen Sun5, Li-Feng Zhao3.
Abstract
Vortioxetine is a potent antagonist of the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor and serotonin transporter and has been reported to function as an antidepressant in the treatment of major depressive disorder. However, its antitumor effects remain unclear. Here, we examined whether vortioxetine affects the characteristics of GC cells. Cell viability was measured by a colony formation assay and, in addition, cell invasion, migration and apoptosis assays were performed with a transwell assay and a flow cytometry assay. Protein levels were measured by western blotting. We found that vortioxetine inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration abilities of AGS cells. Additionally, vortioxetine could induce apoptosis and autophagy by increasing the levels of Bax, active caspase-3/-9, Beclin-1 and light chain 3, as well as by downregulating Bcl-2 and P62. Further investigations indicated that vortioxetine regulated apoptosis and autophagy via activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Taken together, our data suggest that vortioxetine has cytotoxic effects against GC AGS cells as a result of inhibiting proliferation, invasion and migration, as well as by inducing apoptosis and autophagy through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway.Entities:
Keywords: PI3K/AKT pathway; apoptosis; autophagy; gastric cancer; tumorigenicity; vortioxetine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32750222 PMCID: PMC7530385 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.792
Fig. 1Vortioxetine inhibits the proliferative capacities of AGS cells. (A) The change of AGS cell viability in a dose‐dependent manner was assessed using a CCK‐8 assay. ANOVA with Dunnett’s post‐hoc test was used to investigate differences between multiple groups. (B) The change of AGS cell viability in a time‐dependent manner was assessed using a CCK‐8 assay. Student’s t‐test was used to investigate differences between groups. (C) The clonogenic capacity of AGS cell was detected by a colony‐forming assay. Student’s t‐test was used to test differences between groups. Data are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05.
Fig. 2Vortioxetine impairs cell invasion and migration capabilities. (A) Cell invasiveness was assessed by a transwell invasion assay and the number of invading AGS cells was measured. Student’s t‐test was used to test differences between groups. (B) Cell migration capabilities were assessed by a transwell migration assay and the number of migrating AGS cells was measured. Student’s t‐test was used to test differences between two groups. *P < 0.05 compared to the untreated control. Data are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Scale bar = 200 μm
Fig. 3Vortioxetine induces apoptosis in AGS cells. Apoptosis was evaluated by a flow cytometry assay (A) and the protein levels of Bcl‐2, Bax and active caspase‐3/‐9 were measured by western blotting (B). Student’s t‐test was used to test differences between groups. *P < 0.05 compared to the untreated control. Data are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 4Vortioxetine induces autophagy in AGS cells. Autophagy‐related proteins of Beclin‐1, P62 and LC3 were measured in AGS cells by western blotting. ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post‐hoc test was used to test differences between multiple groups. *P < 0.05 compared to the NC group. #P < 0.05 compared to vortioxetine or BafA1. Data are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Fig. 5Vortioxetine inhibits the PI3K/Akt pathway in AGS cells. Protein expression was determined by a western blot assay. Student’s t‐test was used to test differences between groups. *P < 0.05 compared to the untreated control. Data are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3).