Literature DB >> 32749735

Clinical Utility of Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Vertebral Fractures From Computed Tomography Images.

Nithin Kolanu1,2, Elizabeth J Silverstone1, Bao H Ho1, Hiep Pham1, Ash Hansen1, Emma Pauley1, Anna R Quirk1, Sarah C Sweeney1, Jacqueline R Center1,2,3, Nicholas A Pocock1,2,3.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a risk factor for morbidity and mortality, frequently asymptomatic and often present in computed tomography (CT) scans performed for unrelated conditions. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of VCF from such images can potentially improve identification and treatment of osteoporosis. This single-blinded, single tertiary center study compared a CAD (Zebra Medical Vision®) to an adjudicated imaging specialist reevaluation using a retrospective consecutive sample of abdominal and thoracic CT scans (n = 2357) performed as part of routine care. Subjects over 50 years between January 1, 2019 and May 12, 2019 were included. Duplicates and unanalyzable scans were excluded resulting in a total of 1696 CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for all VCF and for Genant grades 2 or 3 (ie, height loss of >25%) using imaging specialist as the gold standard. Prestudy VCF reporting by hospital-rostered radiologist was used to calculate the number of scans needed to screen (NNS) to detect one additional VCF using CAD. Prevalence of any VCF was 24% (406/1696) and of Genant 2/3 VCF was 18% (280/1570). The sensitivity and specificity were 54% and 92%, for all fractures, respectively, and 65% and 92% for Genant 2/3 fractures, respectively. Accuracy for any VCF, and for detection of Genant 2/3 VCF, was 83% and 88%, respectively. Of 221 CAD-detected VCFs, 133 (60.2%) were reported prestudy resulting in 88 additional fractures (72 Genant 2/3) being identified by CAD. NNS to detect one additional VCF was 19 scans for all fractures and 23 for Genant 2/3 fractures. Thus, the CAD tested in this study had a high specificity with moderate sensitivity to detect incidental vertebral fractures in CT scans performed for routine care. A low NNS suggests it is an efficient tool to assist radiologists and clinicians to improve detection and reporting of vertebral fractures.
© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRACTURE PREVENTION; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; OSTEOPOROSIS; RADIOLOGY

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32749735     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  7 in total

Review 1.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.879

2.  Computer-Aided Diagnostic Systems for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Detection: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Kenneth E Poole
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Practical computer vision application to detect hip fractures on pelvic X-rays: a bi-institutional study.

Authors:  Jeff Choi; James Z Hui; David Spain; Yi-Siang Su; Chi-Tung Cheng; Chien-Hung Liao
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-04-07

4.  A software program for automated compressive vertebral fracture detection on elderly women's lateral chest radiograph: Ofeye 1.0.

Authors:  Ben-Heng Xiao; Michael S Y Zhu; Er-Zhu Du; Wei-Hong Liu; Jian-Bing Ma; Hua Huang; Jing-Shan Gong; Davide Diacinti; Kun Zhang; Bo Gao; Heng Liu; Ri-Feng Jiang; Zhong-You Ji; Xiao-Bao Xiong; Lai-Chang He; Lei Wu; Chuan-Jun Xu; Mei-Mei Du; Xiao-Rong Wang; Li-Mei Chen; Kong-Yang Wu; Liu Yang; Mao-Sheng Xu; Daniele Diacinti; Qi Dou; Timothy Y C Kwok; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-08

5.  Systematic analysis of the test design and performance of AI/ML-based medical devices approved for triage/detection/diagnosis in the USA and Japan.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yuba; Kiyotaka Iwasaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A Study on 3D Deep Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Nasal Fractures.

Authors:  Yu Jin Seol; Young Jae Kim; Yoon Sang Kim; Young Woo Cheon; Kwang Gi Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation.

Authors:  Veena Aggarwal; Christina Maslen; Richard L Abel; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Juliet E Compston; Nicola Crabtree; Jennifer S Gregory; Eleni P Kariki; Nicholas C Harvey; Kate A Ward; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.346

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.