| Literature DB >> 32749561 |
Marcela Moreira Salles1, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira1, Ana Paula Macedo1, Cássio do Nascimento1, Cláudia Helena Silva-Lovato1, Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos2.
Abstract
Evaluate, through a randomized clinical trial, the efficacy of brushing associated with oral irrigation in maintaining implant and overdenture hygiene. Thirty-eight participants, who had a clinically acceptable conventional maxillary complete denture and mandibular overdenture retained by either implants or mini-implants using an O-ring-retained system, were enrolled to participate in the study. They were instructed to use two different hygiene methods, in a random sequence for a period of 14 days, with a 7-day wash-out interposed period: (I) mechanical brushing (MB); (II) association of mechanical brushing with oral irrigation (WP). Biofilms from both subgingival sulci and overdentures were collected and processed by Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method at baseline and after using the proposed hygiene protocols. Comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon test and Friedman test with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate, followed by Conover post-hoc test (α = 0.05). In the subgingival sulci-related biofilm, a lower number of microbial cells were detected, after WP compared to the MB method (P < 0.001). The findings of overdenture-related biofilm suggest that both methods were similar (P = 0.607) being the identified microbiota qualitatively coincident after each method. Despite the number of microbial counts, it was concluded that the association of mechanical brushing with oral irrigation was more effective in reducing microorganisms in the subgingival sulci biofilm; however, the same outcome was not observed in the overdentures.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilms; Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Denture cleansers; Oral hygiene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32749561 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00543-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Odontology ISSN: 1618-1247 Impact factor: 2.634