| Literature DB >> 32748565 |
Jolanta Neubauer-Geryk1, Melanie Wielicka1, Grzegorz Kozera1, Małgorzata Myśliwiec2, Katarzyna Zorena3, Leszek Bieniaszewski1.
Abstract
Autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT) frequently coexists with type 1 diabetes (DM1) and additionally increases the extent of microcirculatory complications due to DM1. We hypothesized that in pediatric patients with DM1, impairment of macrocirculation could be further augmented by a coexisting autoimmune process. Therefore, we investigated the influence of AIT on large arteries in DM1 pediatric patients. Our group consisted of 19 DM1, 19 DM1 + AIT patients and 29 control subjects. The groups were comparable regarding age and gender. The DM1 and DM1 + AIT patients were matched for age at onset of DM1 and diabetes duration. Macrocirculation was described using pulsatility indices (PIs) determined for common carotid (CCA) and peripheral arteries of upper and lower limbs. CCA resistance index (RI) and ABI were also assessed. Children with DM1 + AIT had only significantly lower CCA_PI and CCA_RI in comparison with controls whereas in the absence of AIT such difference was not found. The diabetes duration and age of onset did not correlate with carotid indices. Total cholesterol level was higher both in DM1 + AIT and DM1 groups than in the control group. For low density lipoproteins cholesterol, a significant difference was found between DM1 + AIT and control groups. Age-independent impact of AIT on CCA_PI was confirmed by multivariate analysis. Common carotid pulsatility is deteriorated by autoimmune thyroiditis independently of age in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Keywords: autoimmune thyroiditis; carotid pulsatility index; children; type 1 diabetes mellitus; vascular aging
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32748565 PMCID: PMC7399375 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Characteristics of study groups
| Characteristics | Healthy control (C), | Diabetes mellitus t.1 (DM1), | Diabetes mellitus t.1 and autoimmune thyroiditis (DM1 + AIT), |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male gender (%) | 52 | 42 | 42 | .74 |
| Body mass (kg) | 52.8 (29.0–80.1) | 54.8 (29.9–78.5) | 59.2 (43.5–80.3) | .50 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 19.1 (14.4–24.7) | 19.8 (15.0–27.4) | 20.5 (16.1–26.8) | .22 |
| Age (years) | 14.7 (11.3–17.7) | 16 (10.9–17.8) | 15.2 (11.1–18.0) | .20 |
| Age at onset of diabetes (years) | – | 9.3 (2.5–13.5) | 6.6 (1.2–12.2) | .07 |
| Diabetes duration (years) | – | 7 (1.7–12.9) | 8.7 (2.6–14.4) | .16 |
| Insulin dose (units/24h) | – | 40 (25–100) | 47 (20–90) | .30 |
| Treatment with pump (%) | – | 53 | 74 | .18 |
| HbA1C (mmol/mol/%) | 34 (29–38)/5.3 (4.8–5.6) |
60 (44–103)/7.6 (6.2–11.6)
|
64 (41–123)/8 (5.9–13.4)
|
|
| TSH (mIU/l) | 2.1 (0.7–5.1) | 1.5 (0.6–3.1) | 1.9 (1–3.9) | .07 |
| fT4 (pmol/L) | 12.5 (9.3–15) | 12.9 (10.9–15.1) | 12.7 (10.1–18.1) | .65 |
| Albuminuria (mg/dl) | – | 6 (2.5–27) | 10.1 (2.5–20.6) | .69 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.63 (0.52–0.94) | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) | 0.6 (0.5–0.9) | .46 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 105 (77–125) | 99 (79–147) | 107 (77–135) | .24 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 163 (120–218) |
183 (134–248)
|
180 (129–270) * |
|
| Cholesterol LDL (mg/dl) | 94.5 (64–127) | 102 (61–138) |
102 (68–180)
|
|
| Cholesterol HDL (mg/dl) | 50.5 (41–82) | 54 (35–90) | 60 (38–65) | .11 |
| Triglicerydes (mg/dl) | 53.5 (36–117) | 70 (37–294) | 81 (34–160) | .03 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 109 ± 9.3 | 103 ± 9.1 | 107 ± 8.4 | .09 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 62 ± 4.9 | 58 ± 5.2 | 61 ± 6.4 | .62 |
| HR (beats/minutes) | 79 ± 11.8 | 77 ± 10.2 | 84 ± 13.4 | .13 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (minimum; maximum). The value of p < .05 was regarded as statistically significant (in bold).
Abbreviation: HbA1C: glycated hemoglobin; TSH: Thyroid‐stimulating hormone; fT4: free thyroxine; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; HR: heart rate; LDL, low density lipoproteins.
The level of significance of comparison between the groups according to post hoc Fisher's test.
Figure 1The project timeline
Pulsatility indices and ABI in studied subgroups
| Characteristics | Healthy control (C) | Diabetes mellitus t.1 (DM1), | Diabetes mellitus t.1 and autoimmune thyroiditis (DM1 + AIT), |
| p between groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM1 versus C | DM1 + AIT versus C | DM1 versus DM1 + AIT | |||||
| CCA_PI | 2.04 (1.43–3.12) | 1.95 (1.42–2.42) | 1.8 (1.35–2.39) |
| .51 |
| .75 |
| CCA_RI | 0.77 (0.66–0.84) | 0.74 (0.67–0.82) | 0.73 (0.65–0.78) |
| .30 |
| .95 |
| brachial_PI | 2.35 (1.96–3.06) | 2.44 (1.97–3.22) | 2.31 (1.84–2.96) | .40 | – | – | – |
| thigh_PI | 2.18 (1.97–2.71) | 2.31 (2.01–2.93) | 2.21 (1.96–2.57) | .51 | – | – | – |
| above_knee_PI | 2.42 (1.92–2.97) | 2.24 (2.01–3.48) | 2.26 (1.8–2.63) | .12 | – | – | – |
| below_knee_PI | 2.48 (2.02–3.18) | 2.64 (2.21–3.55) | 2.59 (2.22–3.69) | .12 | – | – | – |
| ankle_PI | 2.61 (2.23–3.92) | 2.51 (2.19–3.39) | 2.42 (1.96–3.06) | .29 | – | – | – |
| ABI | 1.03 (0.66–1.68) | 1.09 (0.97–1.31) | 1.09 (0.93–1.34) | .12 | – | – | – |
Values are presented as median (minimum; maximum). The value of p < .05 was regarded as statistically significant (in bold).
The level of significance of comparison between the groups according to post hoc Fisher's test.
General linear model of CCA_PI confounders
| Effect | SS |
| MS |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 (Figure | |||||
| Constant | 1.225 | 1 | 1.225 | 10.584 |
|
| Age | 0.598 | 1 | 0.598 | 5.166 |
|
| Total cholesterol | 0.019 | 1 | 0.019 | 0.164 | .687 |
| Group (C/ DM1/ DM1 + AIT) | 0.860 | 2 | 0.430 | 3.716 |
|
| Error | 7.175 | 62 | 0.116 | ||
| Model 2 (Figure | |||||
| Constant | 1.356 | 1 | 1.356 | 11.69 |
|
| Age | 0.626 | 1 | 0.626 | 5.39 |
|
| LDL cholesterol | 0.001 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.01 | .932 |
| Group (C/ DM1/ DM1 + AIT) | 1.013 | 2 | 0.507 | 4.37 |
|
| Error | 7.193 | 62 | 0.116 | ||
| Model 3 (Figure | |||||
| Constant | 1.909 | 1 | 1.909 | 16.72 |
|
| Age | 0.633 | 1 | 0.633 | 5.54 |
|
| Group (C/ DM1/ DM1 + AIT) | 1.22 | 1 | 1.610 | 5.34 |
|
| Error | 7.194 | 63 | 0.114 | ||
The value of p < .05 was regarded as statistically significant (in bold).
Figure 2The comparison of CCA_PI between groups. (Model 1: adjusted means: age ‐ 15 years, total cholesterol ‐ 178 mg%; Model 2: adjusted means: age‐ 15 years, cholesterol LDL 103 mg%; Model 3: adjusted means: age‐ 15 years)