Literature DB >> 32748347

Effect of a Scoring Rubric on the Review of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.

Nia S Mitchell1,2, Kelly Stolzmann3, Lauren V Benning4, Jolie B Wormwood5,6, Amy M Linsky3,7,8.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; meeting abstract; peer review; reproducibility of results

Year:  2020        PMID： 32748347      PMCID： PMC8342698          DOI： 10.1007/s11606-020-05960-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN： 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  H R Rubin; D A Redelmeier; A W Wu; E P Steinberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology.

Authors:  J Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.557
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Leveling the field: Development of reliable scoring rubrics for quantitative and qualitative medical education research abstracts.

Authors:  Jaime Jordan; Laura R Hopson; Caroline Molins; Suzanne K Bentley; Nicole M Deiorio; Sally A Santen; Lalena M Yarris; Wendy C Coates; Michael A Gisondi
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.