Juqiang Zhang1,2, Hao Peng3, Botian Wang2, Lei Luo2, Yuan Cheng1, Guolin He1, Yujun Tang1, MingXin Pan4. 1. Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China. 2. Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, The Affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital Xiangya Medical College CSU, 412000, Zhuzhou, China. 3. Department of General Surgery, 921st Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of the Chinese people's Liberation Army, 410003, Changsha, China. 4. Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China. pmxwxy@sohu.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that postoperative mesenchymal circulating tumor cell (mCTC) in peripheral blood were independent risk factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical resection. However, few studies have been conducted on the efficacy and survival benefit of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) for patients with mCTC-positive HCC. We evaluated the effect of PA-TACE on the prognosis of mCTC-positive/mCTC-negative HCC patients. METHODS: A total of 261 HCC patients from February 2014 to December 2017 undergoing curative hepatectomy were included in this study. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The results showed that 57.8% (59/102) mCTC-positive and 43.4% (69/159) mCTC-negative patients underwent PA-TACE. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that PVTT (HR 2.370; 95% CI, 1.535-3.660; P < 0.001), BCLC stage (B+C) (HR 3.871; 95% CI, 2.544-5.892; P < 0.001), mCTC (HR 1.414; 95% CI, 1.276-1.622; P < 0.001), and without PA-TACE (HR 1.724; 95% CI, 1.152-2.580; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for poor RFS. Meanwhile, PVTT (HR 1.744; 95% CI, 1.261-2.412; P = 0.001), multinodularity (HR 1.416; 95% CI, 1.069-1.876; P = 0.015), mCTC (HR 1.612; 95% CI, 1.471-1.796; P < 0.001), and without PA-TACE (HR 1.311; 95% CI, 1.010-1.701; P = 0.042) were independent risk factors for poor OS. Both RFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.045) in mCTC-positive patients who received PA-TACE were significantly improved relative to those who underwent hepatic resection alone. Among 102 mCTC-positive patients, the mCTC-positive rate was significantly lower in patients treated with PA-TACE than in those treated with liver resection alone (46.4% vs. 88.4%, P = 0.031). No differences were observed in DFS and OS among the mCTC-negative patients with or without PA-TACE. Early recurrence was more likely to occur in patients without PA-TACE (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: PA-TACE was a safe intervention and could effectively prevent tumor recurrence and improve the survival of mCTC-positive HCC patients.
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that postoperative mesenchymal circulating tumor cell (mCTC) in peripheral blood were independent risk factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical resection. However, few studies have been conducted on the efficacy and survival benefit of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) for patients with mCTC-positive HCC. We evaluated the effect of PA-TACE on the prognosis of mCTC-positive/mCTC-negative HCC patients. METHODS: A total of 261 HCCpatients from February 2014 to December 2017 undergoing curative hepatectomy were included in this study. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The results showed that 57.8% (59/102) mCTC-positive and 43.4% (69/159) mCTC-negative patients underwent PA-TACE. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that PVTT (HR 2.370; 95% CI, 1.535-3.660; P < 0.001), BCLC stage (B+C) (HR 3.871; 95% CI, 2.544-5.892; P < 0.001), mCTC (HR 1.414; 95% CI, 1.276-1.622; P < 0.001), and without PA-TACE (HR 1.724; 95% CI, 1.152-2.580; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for poor RFS. Meanwhile, PVTT (HR 1.744; 95% CI, 1.261-2.412; P = 0.001), multinodularity (HR 1.416; 95% CI, 1.069-1.876; P = 0.015), mCTC (HR 1.612; 95% CI, 1.471-1.796; P < 0.001), and without PA-TACE (HR 1.311; 95% CI, 1.010-1.701; P = 0.042) were independent risk factors for poor OS. Both RFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.045) in mCTC-positive patients who received PA-TACE were significantly improved relative to those who underwent hepatic resection alone. Among 102 mCTC-positive patients, the mCTC-positive rate was significantly lower in patients treated with PA-TACE than in those treated with liver resection alone (46.4% vs. 88.4%, P = 0.031). No differences were observed in DFS and OS among the mCTC-negative patients with or without PA-TACE. Early recurrence was more likely to occur in patients without PA-TACE (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: PA-TACE was a safe intervention and could effectively prevent tumor recurrence and improve the survival of mCTC-positive HCC patients.