Literature DB >> 32747861

Integrative analysis of desert dust size and abundance suggests less dust climate cooling.

Jasper F Kok1, David A Ridley2, Qing Zhou3, Ron L Miller4, Chun Zhao5, Colette L Heald2,6, Daniel S Ward7, Samuel Albani8, Karsten Haustein9.   

Abstract

Desert dust aerosols affect Earth's global energy balance through interactions with radiation1,2, clouds3,4, and ecosystems5. But the magnitudes of these effects are so uncertain that it remains unclear whether atmospheric dust has a net warming or cooling effect on global climate1,4,6. Consequently, it is still uncertain whether large changes in atmospheric dust loading over the past century have slowed or accelerated anthropogenic climate change4,7-9, and the climate impact of possible future alterations in dust loading is similarly disputed9,10. Here we use an integrative analysis of dust aerosol sizes and abundance to constrain the climatic impact of dust through direct interactions with radiation. Using a combination of observational, experimental, and model data, we find that atmospheric dust is substantially coarser than represented in current climate models. Since coarse dust warms global climate, the dust direct radiative effect (DRE) is likely less cooling than the ~0.4 W/m2 estimated by models in a current ensemble2,11-13. We constrain the dust DRE to - 0.20 (-0.48 to +0.20) W/m2, which suggests that the dust DRE produces only about half the cooling that current models estimate, and raises the possibility that dust DRE is actually net warming the planet.

Year:  2017        PMID: 32747861      PMCID: PMC7398272          DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Geosci        ISSN: 1752-0894            Impact factor:   16.908


  6 in total

1.  Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate.

Authors:  P J DeMott; A J Prenni; X Liu; S M Kreidenweis; M D Petters; C H Twohy; M S Richardson; T Eidhammer; D C Rogers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A scaling theory for the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols suggests climate models underestimate the size of the global dust cycle.

Authors:  Jasper F Kok
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Global iron connections between desert dust, ocean biogeochemistry, and climate.

Authors:  T D Jickells; Z S An; K K Andersen; A R Baker; G Bergametti; N Brooks; J J Cao; P W Boyd; R A Duce; K A Hunter; H Kawahata; N Kubilay; J laRoche; P S Liss; N Mahowald; J M Prospero; A J Ridgwell; I Tegen; R Torres
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The physics of wind-blown sand and dust.

Authors:  Jasper F Kok; Eric J R Parteli; Timothy I Michaels; Diana Bou Karam
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2012-09-14

5.  The past, present and future of African dust.

Authors:  Amato T Evan; Cyrille Flamant; Marco Gaetani; Françoise Guichard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Shape and size constraints on dust optical properties from the Dome C ice core, Antarctica.

Authors:  M A C Potenza; S Albani; B Delmonte; S Villa; T Sanvito; B Paroli; A Pullia; G Baccolo; N Mahowald; V Maggi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Revisiting the Observed Correlation Between Weekly Averaged Indian Monsoon Precipitation and Arabian Sea Aerosol Optical Depth.

Authors:  Disha Sharma; Ron L Miller
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.720

2.  Lidar Ratio-Depolarization Ratio Relations of Atmospheric Dust Aerosols: The Super-Spheroid Model and High Spectral Resolution Lidar Observations.

Authors:  Senyi Kong; Kaori Sato; Lei Bi
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 3.  An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.

Authors:  S C Sherwood; M J Webb; J D Annan; K C Armour; P M Forster; J C Hargreaves; G Hegerl; S A Klein; K D Marvel; E J Rohling; M Watanabe; T Andrews; P Braconnot; C S Bretherton; G L Foster; Z Hausfather; A S von der Heydt; R Knutti; T Mauritsen; J R Norris; C Proistosescu; M Rugenstein; G A Schmidt; K B Tokarska; M D Zelinka
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.946

4.  Constraining the atmospheric limb of the plastic cycle.

Authors:  Janice Brahney; Natalie Mahowald; Marje Prank; Gavin Cornwell; Zbigniew Klimont; Hitoshi Matsui; Kimberly Ann Prather
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Saharan dust and giant quartz particle transport towards Iceland.

Authors:  György Varga; Pavla Dagsson-Walhauserová; Fruzsina Gresina; Agusta Helgadottir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A circumpolar dust conveyor in the glacial Southern Ocean.

Authors:  Torben Struve; Katharina Pahnke; Frank Lamy; Marc Wengler; Philipp Böning; Gisela Winckler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Improved Parameterization for the Size Distribution of Emitted Dust Aerosols Reduces Model Underestimation of Super Coarse Dust.

Authors:  Jun Meng; Yue Huang; Danny M Leung; Longlei Li; Adeyemi A Adebiyi; Claire L Ryder; Natalie M Mahowald; Jasper F Kok
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 5.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.