Literature DB >> 32747855

The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: Historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism.

Martyn P Clark1, Marc F P Bierkens2, Luis Samaniego3, Ross A Woods4, Remko Uijlenhoet5, Katrina E Bennett6, Valentijn R N Pauwels7, Xitian Cai8, Andrew W Wood1, Christa D Peters-Lidard9.   

Abstract

The diversity in hydrologic models has historically led to great controversy on the "correct" approach to process-based hydrologic modeling, with debates centered on the adequacy of process parameterizations, data limitations and uncertainty, and computational constraints on model analysis. In this paper, we revisit key modeling challenges on requirements to (1) define suitable model equations, (2) define adequate model parameters, and (3) cope with limitations in computing power. We outline the historical modeling challenges, provide examples of modeling advances that address these challenges, and define outstanding research needs. We illustrate how modeling advances have been made by groups using models of different type and complexity, and we argue for the need to more effectively use our diversity of modeling approaches in order to advance our collective quest for physically realistic hydrologic models.

Year:  2017        PMID: 32747855      PMCID: PMC7398150          DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hydrol Earth Syst Sci        ISSN: 1027-5606            Impact factor:   5.748


  6 in total

1.  Maximum entropy production allows a simple representation of heterogeneity in semiarid ecosystems.

Authors:  Stanislaus J Schymanski; Axel Kleidon; Marc Stieglitz; Jatin Narula
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Practical Use of Computationally Frugal Model Analysis Methods.

Authors:  Mary C Hill; Dmitri Kavetski; Martyn Clark; Ming Ye; Mazdak Arabi; Dan Lu; Laura Foglia; Steffen Mehl
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Enhanced groundwater recharge rates and altered recharge sensitivity to climate variability through subsurface heterogeneity.

Authors:  Andreas Hartmann; Tom Gleeson; Yoshihide Wada; Thorsten Wagener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry.

Authors:  Colin J Gleason; Laurence C Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning.

Authors:  Reed M Maxwell; Laura E Condon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Integrating remotely sensed surface water extent into continental scale hydrology.

Authors:  Beatriz Revilla-Romero; Niko Wanders; Peter Burek; Peter Salamon; Ad de Roo
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.722

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  A simple, dynamic, hydrological model for mesotidal salt marshes.

Authors:  Darryl E Marois; Hilmar A Stecher
Journal:  Estuar Coast Shelf Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.929

2.  Surface Depression and Wetland Water Storage Improves Major River Basin Hydrologic Predictions.

Authors:  Adnan Rajib; Heather E Golden; Charles R Lane; Qiusheng Wu
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.240

3.  The sensitivity of simulated streamflow to individual hydrologic processes across North America.

Authors:  Juliane Mai; James R Craig; Bryan A Tolson; Richard Arsenault
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Regulation-based probabilistic substance quality index and automated geo-spatial modeling for water quality assessment.

Authors:  Artyom Nikitin; Polina Tregubova; Dmitrii Shadrin; Sergey Matveev; Ivan Oseledets; Maria Pukalchik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.