Literature DB >> 32747528

Three-dimensional reconstructions of the putative metazoan Namapoikia show that it was a microbial construction.

Akshay Mehra1,2,3, Wesley A Watters4, John P Grotzinger5, Adam C Maloof6.   

Abstract

Strata from the Ediacaran Period (635 million to 538 million years ago [Ma]) contain several examples of enigmatic, putative shell-building metazoan fossils. These fossils may provide insight into the evolution and environmental impact of biomineralization on Earth, especially if their biological affinities and modern analogs can be identified. Recently, apparent morphological similarities with extant coralline demosponges have been used to assign a poriferan affinity to Namapoikia rietoogensis, a modular encrusting construction that is found growing between (and on) microbial buildups in Namibia. Here, we present three-dimensional reconstructions of Namapoikia that we use to assess the organism's proposed affinity. Our morphological analyses, which comprise quantitative measurements of thickness, spacing, and connectivity, reveal that Namapoikia produced approximately millimeter-thick meandering and branching/merging sheets. We evaluate this reconstructed morphology in the context of poriferan biology and determine that Namapoikia likely is not a sponge-grade organism.

Keywords:  3D reconstruction; Ediacaran; early life

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32747528      PMCID: PMC7443946          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009129117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Shell structure and distribution of Cloudina, a potential index fossil for the terminal Proterozoic.

Authors:  S W Grant
Journal:  Am J Sci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.772

2.  Proterozoic modular biomineralized metazoan from the Nama Group, Namibia.

Authors:  Rachel A Wood; John P Grotzinger; J A D Dickson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The hidden biology of sponges and ctenophores.

Authors:  Casey W Dunn; Sally P Leys; Steven H D Haddock
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Searching for sponge origins.

Authors:  Joseph P Botting; Benjamin J Nettersheim
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Early animals. Ediacaran metazoan reefs from the Nama Group, Namibia.

Authors:  A M Penny; R Wood; A Curtis; F Bowyer; R Tostevin; K-H Hoffman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Multiscale approach reveals that Cloudina aggregates are detritus and not in situ reef constructions.

Authors:  Akshay Mehra; Adam Maloof
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Substrate growth dynamics and biomineralization of an Ediacaran encrusting poriferan.

Authors:  Rachel Wood; Amelia Penny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Where's the glass? Biomarkers, molecular clocks, and microRNAs suggest a 200-Myr missing Precambrian fossil record of siliceous sponge spicules.

Authors:  E A Sperling; J M Robinson; D Pisani; K J Peterson
Journal:  Geobiology       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.407

9.  The sponge pump: the role of current induced flow in the design of the sponge body plan.

Authors:  Sally P Leys; Gitai Yahel; Matthew A Reidenbach; Verena Tunnicliffe; Uri Shavit; Henry M Reiswig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ediacaran skeletal metazoan interpreted as a lophophorate.

Authors:  A Yu Zhuravlev; R A Wood; A M Penny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ediacaran sponges, animal biomineralization, and skeletal reefs.

Authors:  Shuhai Xiao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.