Literature DB >> 32747216

Immunogenicity and safety of different sequential schedules of Sabin strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccination: A randomized, controlled, open-label, phase IV clinical trial in China.

Shaohong Yan1, Haiping Chen2, Zhenguo Zhang3, Shaoying Chang4, Yanhui Xiao2, Linyun Luo2, Zhaoyong Zhang1, Li Sun3, Xiao Chen4, Yunkai Yang5, Xuanwen Shi2, Yu Guo1, Yunlong Sun3, Hong Li4, Na Li5, Shasha Han2, Meng Ma5, Xiaoming Yang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immunogenicity and safety of the sequential schedule of Sabin strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) remains poorly understood in Chinese population.
METHODS: A multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial was performed involving 648 healthy infants aged 2 months from Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, and Hebei provinces. These participants were divided into three groups: sIPV-bOPV-bOPV, sIPV-sIPV-bOPV, and sIPV-sIPV-sIPV. Doses were administered sequentially at age 2, 3, and 4 months. Neutralisation assays were tested using sera collected at 2 months and 5 months.
RESULTS: A total of 569 were included in the per-protocol analysis. The seroconversion rates of poliovirus type 1 and 3 were 100% in all three groups, the seroconversion rate of poliovirus type 2 was 91.53% (173/189) (95% CI: 86.62-95.08) in the sIPV-bOPV-bOPV group, 98.38% (182/185) (95% CI: 95.33-99.66) in the sIPV-sIPV-bOPV group, and 99.49% (194/195) (95% CI: 97.18-99.99) in the sIPV-sIPV-sIPV group. For the seroconversion rate of poliovirus types 1 and 3, the sIPV-bOPV-bOPV and sIPV-sIPV-bOPV groups were non-inferior to the sIPV-sIPV-sIPV group. For the seroconversion rate of poliovirus type 2, the sIPV-sIPV-bOPV group was non-inferior to the sIPV-sIPV-sIPV group, and the sIPV-bOPV-bOPV group was inferior to the sIPV-sIPV-sIPV group. All three groups exhibited good safety, with two serious adverse events reported, that were unrelated to vaccine.
CONCLUSIONS: In china, a new vaccination schedule that including 2 doses of IPV in the national immunization programs is essential. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04054492.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine; Inactivated poliovirus vaccine; Poliovirus; Sabin strain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32747216     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  Safety and immunogenicity of 3 formulations of a Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine produced on the PER.C6® cell line: A phase 2, double-blind, randomized, controlled study in infants vaccinated at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age.

Authors:  Anna Lisa Ong-Lim; Georgi Shukarev; Mitzi Trinidad-Aseron; Delia Caparas-Yu; Astrid Greijer; Michel Duchene; Gert Scheper; Vitalija van Paassen; Mathieu Le Gars; Conor P Cahill; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Macaya Douoguih; Jeanne-Marie Jacquet
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of the chinese inactivated poliovirus vaccine with the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine in children: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiang Sun; Yan Xu; Fenyang Tang; Yanhui Xiao; Zhiguo Wang; Binbing Wang; Xiaoping Zhu; Xiaoming Yang; Haiping Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  The progress of postapproval clinical studies on Sabin IPV.

Authors:  Li Shi; Mingbo Sun
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.