| Literature DB >> 32746962 |
Ryuki Kassai1, Chris van Weel2, Karen Flegg3, Seng Fah Tong4, Tin Myo Han5, Sairat Noknoy6, Myagmartseren Dashtseren7, Pham Le An8, Chirk Jenn Ng9, Ee Ming Khoo9, Kamaliah Mohd Noh10, Meng-Chih Lee11, Amanda Howe12, Felicity Goodyear-Smith13.
Abstract
Primary health care is essential for equitable, cost-effective and sustainable health care. It is the cornerstone to achieving universal health coverage against a backdrop of rising health expenditure and aging populations. Implementing strong primary health care requires grassroots understanding of health system performance. Comparing successes and barriers between countries may help identify mutual challenges and possible solutions. This paper compares and analyses primary health care policy in Australia, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. Data were collected at the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians (WONCA) Asia-Pacific regional conference in November 2017 using a predetermined framework. The six countries varied in maturity of their primary health care systems, including the extent to which family doctors contribute to care delivery. Challenges included an insufficient trained and competent workforce, particularly in rural and remote communities, and deficits in coordination within primary health care, as well as between primary and secondary care. Asia-Pacific regional policy needs to: (1) focus on better collaboration between public and private sectors; (2) take a structured approach to information sharing by bridging gaps in technology, health literacy and interprofessional working; (3) build systems that can evaluate and improve quality of care; and (4) promote community-based, high-quality training programs.Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32746962 DOI: 10.1071/PY19194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aust J Prim Health ISSN: 1448-7527 Impact factor: 1.307