| Literature DB >> 32746834 |
Qianqian Zhao1,2, Mei Zhang1,2, Baolan Ji1,2, Yuntian Chu3, Hui Pan2,4, Wenhua Yan5,6, Bo Ban7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 (GH/IGF-1) axis is critical for the regulation of children's growth and development. Serum IGF-1 concentrations are usually low in individuals with idiopathic short stature (ISS) despite normal endogenous GH levels, and the associated underlying factors are unknown. This study aimed to explore the relationship between IGF-1 and hemoglobin (Hb) in children with ISS.Entities:
Keywords: Hemoglobin; Idiopathic short stature; Insulin-like growth factor-1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32746834 PMCID: PMC7397650 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-020-00600-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study population
Clinical and biochemical characteristics
| Variables | All |
|---|---|
| N | 178 |
| Sex (male %) | 138 (77.53%) |
| Age (years) | 10.4 ± 3.8 |
| Bone age (years) | 8.5 ± 4.1 |
| Height (cm) | 126.47 ± 19.62 |
| Height SDS | −2.71 (−3.18--2.31) |
| Mother’s height (cm) | 155.38 ± 5.54 |
| Father’s height (cm) | 167.59 ± 5.41 |
| Body weight (kg) | 27.29 ± 10.76 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.38 ± 2.57 |
| IGF-1 (ng/mL) | 175.50 (90.05–273.75) |
| IGF-1 SDS | − 0.99 (− 1.60--0.09) |
| Hb (g/L) | 131.81 ± 9.36 |
| Cr (umol/L) | 38.75 ± 9.75 |
| BUN (umol/L) | 4.65 ± 1.15 |
| UA (umol/L) | 268.55 ± 75.63 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.65 ± 0.24 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.79 ± 0.66 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.35 ± 0.27 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.07 ± 0.51 |
| ALT(U/L) | 15.68 ± 6.87 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 4.80 ± 0.58 |
| Estradiol (pg/mL) | 17.83 (11.80–26.79) |
| Testosterone (ng/mL) | 0.25 (0.10–0.86) |
| Pubertal stage | |
| Prepubertal (%) | 129 (72.47%) |
| Pubertal (%) | 49 (27.53%) |
Abbreviations:Height SDS height standard deviation scores, BMI body mass index, IGF-1 SDS insulin like growth factor-1 standard deviation scores, Hb hemoglobin, Cr creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UA uric acid, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ALT alanine aminotransferase, FPG fasting plasma glucose
Normal distribution of data was presented as mean ± standard deviation; nonnormal distribution of data was presented as median (interquartile range) and categorical data using number (percentage)
Association between IGF-1 SDS and different variables (n = 178)
| Variables | B | (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.10 | (0.06, 0.15) | < 0.001 |
| Bone age (years) | 0.11 | (0.07, 0.15) | < 0.001 |
| Height SDS | 0.60 | (0.32, 0.89) | < 0.001 |
| Mother’s height (cm) | −0.01 | (−0.04, 0.03) | 0.739 |
| Father’s height (cm) | 0.01 | (−0.03, 0.04) | 0.735 |
| Body weight (kg) | 0.06 | (0.04, 0.07) | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.20 | (0.13, 0.26) | < 0.001 |
| Hb (g/L) | 0.04 | (0.03, 0.06) | < 0.001 |
| Cr (umol/L) | 0.03 | (0.01, 0.05) | < 0.001 |
| BUN (umol/L) | −0.03 | (−0.20, 0.13) | 0.697 |
| UA (umol/L) | 0.01 | (0.00, 0.01) | 0.017 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.29 | (−0.51, 1.09) | 0.480 |
| TC (mmol/L) | −0.20 | (−0.50, 0.09) | 0.177 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | −0.36 | (−1.08, 0.35) | 0.316 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | −0.25 | (−0.63, 0.13) | 0.193 |
| ALT(U/L) | 0.02 | (−0.01, 0.05) | 0.145 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 0.41 | (0.08, 0.74) | 0.014 |
| Estradiol (pg/mL) | 0.02 | (0.01, 0.03) | < 0.001 |
| Testosterone (ng/mL) | 0.35 | (0.17, 0.53) | < 0.001 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | reference | ||
| Female | −0.33 | (−0.76, 0.11) | 0.142 |
| Pubertal stage | |||
| Prepubertal (%) | reference | ||
| Pubertal (%) | 0.96 | (0.55, 1.36) | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations:Height SDS height standard deviation scores, BMI body mass index, Hb hemoglobin, Cr creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UA uric acid, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ALT alanine aminotransferase, FPG fasting plasma glucose
B unstandardized regression coefficient. P < 0.05 is considered to be statistically signifcant
Threshold effect analysis for the relationship between Hb and IGF-1 SDS
| Models | IGF-1 SDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted B (95%CI) | ||
| Model I | ||
| One line slope ( | 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) | 0.001 |
| Model II | ||
| Hemoglobin’s inflection point | 145 | |
| < 145 ( | 0.05 (0.02, 0.07) | < 0.001 |
| > 145 ( | −0.15 (− 0.23, − 0.06) | 0.001 |
| LRT test | 0.044 | |
Model I, linear analysis; Model II, nonlinear analysis. LRT test, logarithmic likelihood ratio test (p-value< 0.05 indicates that Model II is significantly different from Model I, which indicates a nonlinear relationship); adjustment variables: age, sex, BMI, TC, pubertal stage
BMI body mass index, TC total cholesterol
B unstandardized regression coefficient; P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant
Fig. 2The relationship between Hb and IGF-1 SDS by smooth curve fitting (n = 178), P < 0.001. The solid line is the curve fitting line, and the dotted line is the 95% confidence interval (a). Scatter plot of the distribution of child Hb and IGF-1 SDS (b). Adjustment variables: age, height, weight, Cr, UA, FPG, estradiol, testosterone and pubertal stage. Cr: creatinine; UA: uric acid; FPG: fasting plasma glucose