M P Czubryt1, T Stecy2, E Popke2, R Aitken3, K Jabusch2, R Pound2, P Lawes2, B Ramjiawan4, G N Pierce5. 1. St Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: mczubryt@sbrc.ca. 2. St Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 3. St Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Canada. 4. St Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Manitoba, Canada. 5. St Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: gpierce@sbrc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The shortage of single-use N95 respirator masks (NRMs) during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has prompted consideration of NRM recycling to extend limited stocks by healthcare providers and facilities. AIM: To assess potential reuse via autoclaving of NRMs worn daily in a major urban Canadian hospital. METHODS: NRM reusability was assessed following collection from volunteer staff after 2-8 h use, sterilization by autoclaving and PortaCount fit testing. A workflow was developed for reprocessing hundreds of NRMs daily. FINDINGS: Used NRMs passed fit testing after autoclaving once, with 86% passing a second reuse/autoclave cycle. A separate cohort of used masks pre-warmed before autoclaving passed fit testing. To recycle 200-1000 NRMs daily, procedures for collection, sterilization and re-distribution were developed to minimize particle aerosolization risk during NRM handling, to reject NRM showing obvious wear, and to promote adoption by staff. NRM recovery ranged from 49% to 80% across 12 collection cycles. CONCLUSION: Reuse of NRMs is feasible in major hospitals and other healthcare facilities. In sharp contrast to studies of unused NRMs passing fit testing after 10 autoclave cycles, we show that daily wear substantially reduces NRM fit, limiting reuse to a single cycle, but still increasing NRM stocks by ∼66%. Such reuse requires development of a comprehensive plan that includes communication across staffing levels, from front-line workers to hospital administration, to increase the collection, acceptance of and adherence to sterilization processes for NRM recovery.
BACKGROUND: The shortage of single-use N95 respirator masks (NRMs) during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has prompted consideration of NRM recycling to extend limited stocks by healthcare providers and facilities. AIM: To assess potential reuse via autoclaving of NRMs worn daily in a major urban Canadian hospital. METHODS:NRM reusability was assessed following collection from volunteer staff after 2-8 h use, sterilization by autoclaving and PortaCount fit testing. A workflow was developed for reprocessing hundreds of NRMs daily. FINDINGS: Used NRMs passed fit testing after autoclaving once, with 86% passing a second reuse/autoclave cycle. A separate cohort of used masks pre-warmed before autoclaving passed fit testing. To recycle 200-1000 NRMs daily, procedures for collection, sterilization and re-distribution were developed to minimize particle aerosolization risk during NRM handling, to reject NRM showing obvious wear, and to promote adoption by staff. NRM recovery ranged from 49% to 80% across 12 collection cycles. CONCLUSION: Reuse of NRMs is feasible in major hospitals and other healthcare facilities. In sharp contrast to studies of unused NRMs passing fit testing after 10 autoclave cycles, we show that daily wear substantially reduces NRM fit, limiting reuse to a single cycle, but still increasing NRMstocks by ∼66%. Such reuse requires development of a comprehensive plan that includes communication across staffing levels, from front-line workers to hospital administration, to increase the collection, acceptance of and adherence to sterilization processes for NRM recovery.
Authors: Peter L Wang; Alex Roschli; M Parans Paranthaman; Merlin Theodore; Corson L Cramer; Chris Zangmeister; Yuepeng Zhang; Jeffrey J Urban; Lonnie Love Journal: MRS Bull Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 4.882
Authors: Jeffrey T Mueller; Soroor Karimi; Karl A Poterack; Maria Teresa A Seville; Steven M Tipton Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Bory Kea; Alicia Johnson; Amber Lin; Jodi Lapidus; Jennifer N Cook; Calvin Choi; Bernard P Chang; Marc A Probst; Joel Park; Clare Atzema; Blanca Coll-Vinent; Giorgio Constantino; Dar'ya Pozhidayeva; Amy Wilson; Adrienne Zell; Matt Hansen Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2021-03-26
Authors: Juliana Rizzo Gnatta; Rafael Queiroz de Souza; Cassiane de Santana Lemos; Ramon Antônio Oliveira; Lisiane Ruchinsque Martins; Giovana Abrahão de Araújo Moriya; Vanessa de Brito Poveda Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: George Varghese P J; Deepthi Anna David; Anas Karuth; Jabeen Fatima Manamkeri Jafferali; Sabura Begum P M; Jinu Jacob George; Bakhtiyor Rasulev; Prasanth Raghavan Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2022-01-18
Authors: Jacqueline Chu; Omkar Ghenand; Joy Collins; James Byrne; Adam Wentworth; Peter R Chai; Farah Dadabhoy; Chin Hur; Giovanni Traverso Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: C Carolina Ontiveros; David C Shoults; Sean MacIsaac; Kyle D Rauch; Crystal L Sweeney; Amina K Stoddart; Graham A Gagnon Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 4.379