| Literature DB >> 32744944 |
Stacie B Dusetzina1, Juliette Cubanski2, Leonce Nshuti3, Sarah True4, Jack Hoadley5, Drew Roberts6, Tricia Neuman7.
Abstract
Recent press reports and other evidence suggest that Medicare Part D plans may be encouraging the use of brand-name drugs instead of generics. However, the scope of such practices is unclear. We examined Medicare Part D formulary coverage and tier placement of matched pairs of brand-name drugs and generics to quantify how often preferred formulary placement of brand-name drugs is occurring within and across Part D plans and to assess the cost implications for Medicare and its beneficiaries. We found that in 2019, 84 percent of 4,176,772 Part D plan-product combinations had generic-only coverage (that is, the brand-name counterparts were not covered). Another 15 percent covered both the brand-name and generic versions of a product. For the small number of products whose brand-name versions were covered preferentially to their generic equivalents, beneficiary and Medicare prices were generally low for both products. Overall, we found that most Part D plan formularies are designed to encourage the use of generics rather than their brand-name counterparts. Policy makers should continue to monitor Part D formulary coverage patterns to ensure consistent and generous coverage for generic drugs, given their important role in reducing prescription drug spending.Entities:
Keywords: Brand-name drugs; Cost sharing; Formularies; Generic drugs; Health Policy; Medicare Part D; Medicare savings program; Out-of-pocket expenses; Prescription drug plans; Prescription drugs; Utilization management
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32744944 PMCID: PMC9297534 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 9.048