Literature DB >> 32744759

Robust data and power in infant research: A case study of the effect of number of infants and number of trials in visual preference procedures.

Michaela C DeBolt1,2, Mijke Rhemtulla2, Lisa M Oakes1,2.   

Abstract

As in many areas of science, infant research suffers from low power. The problem is further compounded in infant research because of the difficulty in recruiting and testing large numbers of infant participants. Researchers have been searching for a solution and, as illustrated by this special section, have been focused on getting the most out of infant data. We illustrate one solution by showing how we can increase power in visual preference tasks by increasing the amount of data obtained from each infant. We discuss issues of power and present work examining how, under some circumstances, power is increased by increasing the precision of measurement. We report the results of a series of simulations based on a sample of visual preference task data collected from three infant laboratories showing how more powerful research designs can be achieved by including more trials per infant. Implications for infant procedures in general are discussed.
© 2020 International Congress of Infant Studies (ICIS).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32744759     DOI: 10.1111/infa.12337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infancy        ISSN: 1532-7078


  7 in total

1.  Objectively measured teacher and preschooler vocalizations: Phonemic diversity is associated with language abilities.

Authors:  Samantha G Mitsven; Lynn K Perry; Yudong Tao; Batya E Elbaum; Neil F Johnson; Daniel S Messinger
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-10-08

2.  Peekbank: An open, large-scale repository for developmental eye-tracking data of children's word recognition.

Authors:  Martin Zettersten; Daniel Yurovsky; Tian Linger Xu; Sarp Uner; Angeline Sin Mei Tsui; Rose M Schneider; Annissa N Saleh; Stephan C Meylan; Virginia A Marchman; Jessica Mankewitz; Kyle MacDonald; Bria Long; Molly Lewis; George Kachergis; Kunal Handa; Benjamin deMayo; Alexandra Carstensen; Mika Braginsky; Veronica Boyce; Naiti S Bhatt; Claire Augusta Bergey; Michael C Frank
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  Coordination of Caregiver Naming and Children's Exploration of Solid Objects and Nonsolid Substances.

Authors:  Lynn K Perry; Stephanie A Custode; Regina M Fasano; Brittney M Gonzalez; Adriana M Valtierra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  The importance of using multiple outcome measures in infant research.

Authors:  Vanessa LoBue; Lori B Reider; Emily Kim; Jessica L Burris; Denise S Oleas; Kristin A Buss; Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Andy P Field
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Individual differences in infancy research: Letting the baby stand out from the crowd.

Authors:  Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Alicia Vallorani; Kristin A Buss; Vanessa LoBue
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2020-05-04

6.  Toward Cumulative Cognitive Science: A Comparison of Meta-Analysis, Mega-Analysis, and Hybrid Approaches.

Authors:  Ezequiel Koile; Alejandrina Cristia
Journal:  Open Mind (Camb)       Date:  2021-11-25

7.  Rhesus monkeys have an interoceptive sense of their beating hearts.

Authors:  Joey A Charbonneau; Lara Maister; Manos Tsakiris; Eliza Bliss-Moreau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 12.779

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.