Literature DB >> 32744360

Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Junichi Suzuki1, Tatsuhiko Urakami1, Kei Yoshida1, Remi Kuwabara1, Yusuke Mine1, Masako Aoki1, Ichiro Morioka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glycemic markers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
METHODS: Subjects consisted of 85 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using FGM. We assessed the association between scanning frequencies of FGM- and CGM-derived metrics: Time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL), time below range (TBR) (<70 mg/dL), time above range (>180 mg/dL), and other glycemic markers - laboratory-measured HbA1c and CGM-estimated glucose and HbA1c (eA1c) levels in the subjects.
RESULTS: The mean number of scans was 11.5 ± 3.5 (5-20) times per day, and scanning was most frequently conducted during a period of 18-24 h. Scanning frequency showed significant positive correlation with TIR (r = 0.719, P < 0.0001) and inverse correlation with time above range (r = -0.743, P < 0.0001), but did not correlate with TBR. There were also significant inverse correlations between scanning frequency and glucose, HbA1c, and eA1c levels (r = -0.765, -0.815, and -0.793, respectively, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Frequent glucose testing with FGM decreased hyperglycemia with increased TIR, but did not reduce TBR. Coping with a rapid fall of glucose and unexpected hypoglycemia with more advanced technology might contribute to a reduction in TBR.
© 2020 Japan Pediatric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HbA1c; continuous glucose monitoring; flash glucose monitoring; time in range; type 1 diabetes

Year:  2021        PMID: 32744360     DOI: 10.1111/ped.14412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Int        ISSN: 1328-8067            Impact factor:   1.524


  3 in total

1.  Frequency of flash glucose monitoring and glucose metrics: real-world observational data from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammad Y Al-Harbi; Abdulhameed Albunyan; Ahmed Alnahari; Kalvin Kao; Laura Brandner; Manal El Jammal; Timothy C Dunn
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.395

2.  Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Alana McMichael; Maria Rivera-Santana; Jacob Noel; Tamara Hershey
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-03

3.  Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Urakami; Kei Yoshida; Remi Kuwabara; Yusuke Mine; Masako Aoki; Junichi Suzuki; Ichiro Morioka
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.232

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.