BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has heterogeneous manifestations, though one of the most common symptoms is a sudden loss of smell (anosmia or hyposmia). We investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19. METHODS: This preregistered, cross-sectional study used a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0-100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n=4148) or negative (C19-; n=546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified singular and cumulative predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. RESULTS: Both C19+ and C19- groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean±SD, C19+: -82.5±27.2 points; C19-: -59.8±37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both single and cumulative feature models (ROC AUC=0.72), with additional features providing no significant model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms, such as fever or cough. Olfactory recovery within 40 days was reported for ~50% of participants and was best predicted by time since illness onset. CONCLUSIONS: As smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19, we developed the ODoR-19 tool, a 0-10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss. Numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (10<OR<4), especially when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has heterogeneous manifestations, though one of the most common symptoms is a sudden loss of smell (anosmia or hyposmia). We investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19. METHODS: This preregistered, cross-sectional study used a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0-100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n=4148) or negative (C19-; n=546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified singular and cumulative predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. RESULTS: Both C19+ and C19- groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean±SD, C19+: -82.5±27.2 points; C19-: -59.8±37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both single and cumulative feature models (ROC AUC=0.72), with additional features providing no significant model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms, such as fever or cough. Olfactory recovery within 40 days was reported for ~50% of participants and was best predicted by time since illness onset. CONCLUSIONS: As smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19, we developed the ODoR-19 tool, a 0-10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss. Numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (10<OR<4), especially when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.
Authors: Julian A F Klein; Lisa J Krüger; Frank Tobian; Mary Gaeddert; Federica Lainati; Paul Schnitzler; Andreas K Lindner; Olga Nikolai; B Knorr; A Welker; Margaretha de Vos; Jilian A Sacks; Camille Escadafal; Claudia M Denkinger Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Diego A Rodríguez-Serrano; Emilia Roy-Vallejo; Isidoro González-Álvaro; Laura Cardeñoso; Nelly D Zurita Cruz; Alexandra Martín Ramírez; Sebastián C Rodríguez-García; Nuria Arevalillo-Fernández; José María Galván-Román; Leticia Fontán García-Rodrigo; Lorena Vega-Piris; Marta Chicot Llano; David Arribas Méndez; Begoña González de Marcos; Julia Hernando Santos; Ana Sánchez Azofra; Elena Ávalos Pérez-Urria; Pablo Rodriguez-Cortes; Laura Esparcia; Ana Marcos-Jimenez; Santiago Sánchez-Alonso; Irene Llorente; Joan Soriano; Carmen Suárez Fernández; Rosario García-Vicuña; Julio Ancochea; Jesús Sanz; Cecilia Muñoz-Calleja; Rafael de la Cámara; Alfonso Canabal Berlanga Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 4.379