| Literature DB >> 32742644 |
Gracielle Amaral de Araújo1, Raysa da Silva Farias1, Samuel de Sousa Pedro1, Nazareth N Rocha1, Fernanda C F Brito1, Christianne B V Scaramello1.
Abstract
Litter size reduction can induce early overnourishment, being an attractive experimental model to study short- and long-term consequences of childhood obesity. Epidemiological data indicate sex differences regarding cardiometabolic disorders and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The present study aimed to describe biometric, nutritional and cardiovascular changes related to neonatal overweight promoted by litter size reduction in young and adult Wistar rats of both sexes. Litter adjustment to eight or four pups/mother (1:1 male-to-female ratio) gave, respectively, control and overweight groups. Body mass, food intake, haemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters and cardiorespiratory capacity were evaluated at postnatal days 30 and 150. Diminished litters were correlated with higher body mass and weight gain (12 %) during lactation, validating the experimental model of neonatal overweight. Soon after weaning male (16 %) and female (25 %) offspring of these litters presented a lower food intake than their respective control, without differences in body mass. Adult males from reduced litters presented higher abdominal circumference (7 %), systolic blood pressure (10 %), interventricular septum thickness (15 %) and relative wall thickness (15 %) compared with their respective control. Rats' performance on the maximal effort ergometer test was not affected by neonatal overweight. Data suggest the occurrence of catch-down growth and hypophagia in male and female rats submitted to neonatal overweight. However, only male rats presented haemodynamic and cardiac structural changes. These findings are crucial to personalised/gender medicine.Entities:
Keywords: AC, abdominal circumference; Cardiovascular system; Child development; IVS, interventricular septum thickness; IVSd, interventricular septum thickness diastole; IVSs, interventricular septum thickness systole; LVID, left ventricle internal diameter; LVIDd, left ventricle internal diameter diastole; LVPW, left ventricle posterior wall thickness; LVPWd, left ventricle posterior wall thickness diastole; LVPWs, left ventricle posterior wall thickness systole; Lactation; NAL, nose-to-anus length; Overweight; Sex characteristics; TC, thoracic circumference
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32742644 PMCID: PMC7372176 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2020.21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Fig. 1.Body mass (a, b) and weight gain (c, d) in grams throughout lactation. (a, c) Male offspring. (b, d) Female offspring. -○-, □, Control group (n 16); -■-, ■, overweight group (n 20). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Body mass data were analysed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. Weight gain was analysed using the unpaired t test. * P < 0⋅05 v. respective control group.
Biometric parameters of male offspring
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Postnatal day 30 | Postnatal day 150 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | |||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||
| 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||||
| BM (g) | 165⋅0 | 10⋅4 | 158⋅9 | 16⋅5 | 448⋅4 | 21⋅1 | 458⋅9 | 66⋅4 |
| NAL (cm) | 17⋅3 | 0⋅8 | 16⋅9 | 0⋅6 | 25⋅8 | 1⋅1 | 25⋅5 | 1⋅1 |
| BMI (g/cm2) | 0⋅55 | 0⋅05 | 0⋅56 | 0⋅03 | 0⋅67 | 0⋅03 | 0⋅70 | 0⋅07 |
| AC (cm) | 15⋅8 | 1⋅1 | 15⋅3 | 0⋅9 | 20⋅5 | 1⋅4 | 22⋅1* | 1⋅3 |
| TC (cm) | 13⋅8 | 0⋅8 | 13⋅7 | 0⋅5 | 17⋅8 | 1⋅3 | 18⋅2 | 0⋅6 |
| AC:TC | 1⋅15 | 0⋅05 | 1⋅12 | 0⋅02 | 1⋅15 | 0⋅04 | 1⋅21* | 0⋅06 |
BM, body mass; NAL, nose-to-anus length; AC, abdominal circumference; TC, thoracic circumference.
* P < 0⋅05 v. respective control group. Data were analysed using the unpaired t test.
Biometric parameters of female offspring
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Postnatal day 30 | Postnatal day 150 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | |||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||
| 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||||
| BM (g) | 129⋅4 | 14⋅8 | 138⋅2 | 13⋅0 | 248⋅8 | 19⋅2 | 260⋅7 | 31⋅7 |
| NAL (cm) | 16⋅5 | 0⋅6 | 16⋅6 | 0⋅4 | 21⋅7 | 0⋅9 | 22⋅3 | 0⋅7 |
| BMI (g/cm2) | 0⋅48 | 0⋅04 | 0⋅50 | 0⋅04 | 0⋅53 | 0⋅03 | 0⋅53 | 0⋅06 |
| AC (cm) | 14⋅0 | 0⋅8 | 14⋅8 | 0⋅8 | 18⋅0 | 0⋅6 | 18⋅6 | 0⋅9 |
| TC (cm) | 12⋅8 | 0⋅9 | 13⋅1 | 0⋅6 | 15⋅3 | 0⋅8 | 15⋅4 | 0⋅8 |
| AC:TC | 1⋅09 | 0⋅04 | 1⋅13 | 0⋅05 | 1⋅18 | 0⋅04 | 1⋅21 | 0⋅05 |
BM, body mass; NAL, nose-to-anus length; AC, abdominal circumference; TC, thoracic circumference.
Nutritional parameters of male offspring
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Postanatal days 21–30 | Postanatal days 30–150 | Postnatal days 21–150 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | |||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||||
| 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||||||
| Weight variation (g) | 46⋅9 | 14⋅8 | 40⋅7 | 9⋅1 | 335⋅9 | 20⋅7 | 345⋅0 | 64⋅6 | 382⋅8 | 24⋅0 | 385⋅7 | 57⋅3 |
| Food intake (g) | 131⋅3 | 16⋅4 | 110⋅3* | 20⋅4 | 2540 | 232⋅5 | 2663 | 168⋅2 | 2672 | 216⋅5 | 2773 | 148⋅7 |
| Feed efficiency | 0⋅350 | 0⋅066 | 0⋅369 | 0⋅043 | 0⋅133 | 0⋅014 | 0⋅129 | 0⋅019 | 0⋅145 | 0⋅018 | 0⋅139 | 0⋅015 |
* P < 0⋅05 v. respective control group. Data were analysed using the unpaired t test.
Nutritional parameters of female offspring
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Postnatal days 21–30 | Postnatal days 30–150 | Postnatal days 21–150 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | |||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||||
| 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||||||
| Weight variation (g) | 42⋅0 | 6⋅5 | 33⋅9 | 7⋅1 | 161⋅7 | 7⋅6 | 172⋅0 | 14⋅4 | 203⋅8 | 12⋅8 | 205⋅9 | 9⋅9 |
| Food intake (g) | 137⋅9 | 8⋅5 | 102⋅8 | 23⋅1 | 1916 | 357⋅2 | 1895 | 99⋅8 | 2054 | 348⋅7 | 1998 | 103⋅2 |
| Feed efficiency | 0⋅304 | 0⋅037 | 0⋅331 | 0⋅020 | 0⋅087 | 0⋅017 | 0⋅091 | 0⋅006 | 0⋅102 | 0⋅020 | 0⋅103 | 0⋅004 |
Haemodynamic and echocardiographic data of male offspring
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Postnatal day 30 | Postnatal day 150 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | |||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||
| Haemodynamic data | ||||||||
| 8 | 11 | 10 | 10 | |||||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 100⋅6 | 5⋅2 | 111⋅6** | 6⋅5 | 126⋅3 | 15⋅9 | 142⋅6* | 15⋅2 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 364⋅2 | 61⋅0 | 363⋅4 | 58⋅1 | 332⋅0 | 60⋅2 | 341⋅6 | 48⋅4 |
| Echocardiographic data | ||||||||
| 12 | 11 | 10 | 10 | |||||
| IVSd (cm) | 0⋅112 | 0⋅009 | 0⋅127* | 0⋅004 | 0⋅195 | 0⋅025 | 0⋅227* | 0⋅028 |
| IVSs (cm) | 0⋅190 | 0⋅031 | 0⋅227* | 0⋅018 | 0⋅338 | 0⋅040 | 0⋅354 | 0⋅052 |
| LVIDd (cm) | 0⋅335 | 0⋅037 | 0⋅379 | 0⋅056 | 0⋅553 | 0⋅103 | 0⋅525 | 0⋅054 |
| LVIDs (cm) | 0⋅122 | 0⋅017 | 0⋅145 | 0⋅043 | 0⋅238 | 0⋅085 | 0⋅191 | 0⋅064 |
| LVPWd (cm) | 0⋅112 | 0⋅010 | 0⋅127* | 0⋅004 | 0⋅199 | 0⋅016 | 0⋅230 | 0⋅029 |
| LVPWs (cm) | 0⋅191 | 0⋅029 | 0⋅237* | 0⋅020 | 0⋅332 | 0⋅029 | 0⋅359 | 0⋅045 |
| RWT (cm) | 0⋅675 | 0⋅074 | 0⋅679 | 0⋅091 | 0⋅740 | 0⋅139 | 0⋅880* | 0⋅115 |
| LVM (g) | 0⋅709 | 0⋅029 | 0⋅768* | 0⋅058 | 1⋅170 | 0⋅166 | 1⋅271 | 0⋅200 |
| LA:Ao | 1⋅050 | 0⋅106 | 1⋅118 | 0⋅143 | 0⋅943 | 0⋅140 | 1⋅025 | 0⋅062 |
| LVEF (%) | 94⋅61 | 2⋅43 | 93⋅54 | 3⋅27 | 88⋅09 | 8⋅57 | 95⋅48* | 3⋅85 |
| FS (%) | 64⋅04 | 6⋅02 | 63⋅08 | 6⋅19 | 58⋅29 | 9⋅28 | 69⋅58* | 9⋅47 |
| Mitral DT (ms) | 62⋅75 | 6⋅84 | 67⋅67 | 8⋅99 | 89⋅63 | 12⋅18 | 88⋅13 | 6⋅64 |
IVSd, interventricular septum thickness diastole; IVSs, interventricular septum thickness systole; LVIDd, left ventricle internal diameter diastole; LVIDs, left ventricle internal diameter systole; LVPWd, left ventricle posterior wall thickness diastole; LVPWs, left ventricle posterior wall thickness systole; RWT, relative wall thickness; LVM, left ventricle mass; LA:Ao, left atrium:aorta ratio; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; mitral DT, mitral deceleration time.
* P < 0⋅05 v. respective control group. Data were analysed using the unpaired t test.
Haemodynamic and echocardiographic data of female offspring
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Postnatal day 30 | Postnatal day 150 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Overweight | Control | Overweight | |||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||
| Haemodynamic data | ||||||||
| 8 | 11 | 10 | 10 | |||||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 101⋅5 | 7⋅3 | 106⋅6 | 3⋅9 | 140⋅5 | 19⋅6 | 124⋅8* | 15⋅3 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 406⋅2 | 36⋅5 | 362⋅8 | 62⋅6 | 350⋅6 | 41⋅3 | 353⋅9 | 49⋅4 |
| Echocardiographic data | ||||||||
| 12 | 11 | 10 | 10 | |||||
| IVSd (cm) | 0⋅116 | 0⋅006 | 0⋅128* | 0⋅005 | 0⋅158 | 0⋅019 | 0⋅177 | 0⋅032 |
| IVSs (cm) | 0⋅217 | 0⋅037 | 0⋅212 | 0⋅014 | 0⋅302 | 0⋅020 | 0⋅315 | 0⋅037 |
| LVIDd (cm) | 0⋅358 | 0⋅059 | 0⋅350 | 0⋅024 | 0⋅535 | 0⋅059 | 0⋅504 | 0⋅062 |
| LVIDs (cm) | 0⋅149 | 0⋅076 | 0⋅127 | 0⋅024 | 0⋅191 | 0⋅063 | 0⋅160 | 0⋅039 |
| LVPWd (cm) | 0⋅115 | 0⋅006 | 0⋅128* | 0⋅005 | 0⋅165 | 0⋅022 | 0⋅179 | 0⋅030 |
| LVPWs (cm) | 0⋅212 | 0⋅029 | 0⋅214 | 0⋅013 | 0⋅300 | 0⋅024 | 0⋅315 | 0⋅032 |
| RWT (cm) | 0⋅654 | 0⋅088 | 0⋅733* | 0⋅038 | 0⋅629 | 0⋅135 | 0⋅721 | 0⋅155 |
| LVM (g) | 0⋅725 | 0⋅039 | 0⋅750 | 0⋅041 | 1⋅000 | 0⋅074 | 1⋅050 | 0⋅144 |
| LA:Ao | 1⋅075 | 0⋅108 | 1⋅074 | 0⋅129 | 0⋅960 | 0⋅112 | 1⋅049 | 0⋅154 |
| LVEF (%) | 95⋅18 | 1⋅85 | 93⋅96 | 3⋅87 | 93⋅81 | 4⋅46 | 94⋅91 | 3⋅52 |
| S (%) | 65⋅88 | 4⋅13 | 64⋅04 | 6⋅19 | 65⋅12 | 7⋅19 | 66⋅12 | 9⋅23 |
| Mitral DT (ms) | 62⋅50 | 7⋅15 | 67⋅75 | 8⋅07 | 87⋅92 | 8⋅31 | 90⋅00 | 4⋅63 |
IVSd, interventricular septum thickness diastole; IVSs, interventricular septum thickness systole; LVIDd, left ventricle internal diameter diastole; LVIDs, left ventricle internal diameter systole; LVPWd, left ventricle posterior wall thickness diastole; LVPWs, left ventricle posterior wall thickness systole; RWT, relative wall thickness; LVM, left ventricle mass; LA:Ao, left atrium:aorta ratio; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; mitral DT, mitral deceleration time.
* P < 0⋅05 v. respective control group. Data were analysed using the unpaired t test.
Fig. 2.Data from the maximal effort ergometer test (a−f) at postnatal days (PND) 30 and 150. (a–c) Male offspring: control (□; n 5); overweight (■; n 8). (d–f) Female offspring: control (□; n 8); overweight (■; n 7). (a, d) Time spent (h). (b, e) Distance travelled (km). (c, f) Maximum speed developed (km/h). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Data from the maximal effort ergometer tests were analysed using the unpaired t test. * P < 0⋅05 v. respective control group.