Literature DB >> 32742525

Quantifying TOLNet Ozone Lidar Accuracy during the 2014 DISCOVER-AQ and FRAPPÉ Campaigns.

Lihua Wang1, Michael J Newchurch1, Raul J Alvarez2, Timothy A Berkoff3, Steven S Brown2, William Carrion3,4, Russell J De Young3, Bryan J Johnson2, Rene Ganoe4, Guillaume Gronoff3,4, Guillaume Kirgis2,5, Shi Kuang1, Andrew O Langford2, Thierry Leblanc6, Erin E McDuffie2,5, Thomas J McGee7, Denis Pliutau4, Christoph J Senff2,5, John T Sullivan7, Grant Sumnicht4, Laurence W Twigg4, Andrew J Weinheimer8.   

Abstract

The Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Network (TOLNet) is a unique network of lidar systems that measure high-resolution atmospheric profiles of ozone. The accurate characterization of these lidars is necessary to determine the uniformity of cross-instrument calibration. From July to August 2014, three lidars, the TROPospheric OZone (TROPOZ) lidar, the Tunable Optical Profiler for Aerosol and oZone (TOPAZ) lidar, and the Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL), of TOLNet participated in the "Deriving Information on Surface conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations Relevant to Air Quality" (DISCOVER-AQ)mission and the "Front Range Air Pollution and Photochemistry Éxperiment" (FRAPPÉ)to measure ozone variations from the boundary layer to the top of the troposphere. This study presents the analysis of the intercomparison between the TROPOZ, TOPAZ, and LMOL lidars, along with comparisons between the lidars and other in situ ozone instruments including ozonesondes and a P-3B airborne chemiluminescence sensor. In terms of the range-resolving capability, the TOLNet lidars measured vertical ozone structures with an accuracy generally better than ±15% within the troposphere. Larger differences occur at some individual altitudes in both the near-field and far-field range of the lidar systems, largely as expected. In terms of column average, the TOLNet lidars measured ozone with an accuracy better than ±5% for both the intercomparison between the lidars and between the lidars and other instruments. These results indicate very good measurement accuracy for these three TOLNet lidars, making them suitable for use in air quality, satellite validation, and ozone modeling efforts.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 32742525      PMCID: PMC7394036          DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-3865-2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech        ISSN: 1867-1381            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Multiwavelength lidar for ozone measurements in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere.

Authors:  A Papayannis; G Ancellet; J Pelon; G Mégie
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Measurement intercomparison of the JPL and GSFC stratospheric ozone lidar systems.

Authors:  I S McDermid; S M Godin; L O Lindqvist; T D Walsh; J Burris; J Butler; R Ferrare; D Whiteman; T J McGee
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Compensational three-wavelength differential-absorption lidar technique for reducing the influence of differential scattering on ozone-concentration measurements.

Authors:  V A Kovalev; M P Bristow
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Improvements of the aerosol algorithm in ozone lidar data processing by use of evolutionary strategies.

Authors:  Holger Eisele; Thomas Trickl
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Ultraviolet DIAL measurements of O3 profiles in regions of spatially inhomogeneous aerosols.

Authors:  E V Browell; S Ismail; S T Shipley
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1985-09-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Langley mobile ozone lidar: ozone and aerosol atmospheric profiling for air quality research.

Authors:  Russell De Young; William Carrion; Rene Ganoe; Denis Pliutau; Guillaume Gronoff; Timothy Berkoff; Shi Kuang
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Ground-based lidar for atmospheric boundary layer ozone measurements.

Authors:  Shi Kuang; Michael J Newchurch; John Burris; Xiong Liu
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 1.980

8.  Ozone differential absorption lidar algorithm intercomparison.

Authors:  S Godin; A I Carswell; D P Donovan; H Claude; W Steinbrecht; I S McDermid; T J McGee; M R Gross; H Nakane; D P Swart; H B Bergwerff; O Uchino; P von der Gathen; R Neuber
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 1.980

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Ozone Water-Land Environmental Transition Study (OWLETS): An Innovative Strategy for Understanding Chesapeake Bay Pollution Events.

Authors:  John T Sullivan; Timothy Berkoff; Guillaume Gronoff; Travis Knepp; Margaret Pippin; Danette Allen; Laurence Twigg; Robert Swap; Maria Tzortziou; Anne M Thompson; Ryan M Stauffer; Glenn M Wolfe; James Flynn; Sally E Pusede; Laura Judd; William Moore; Barry D Baker; Jay Al-Saadi; Thomas J McGee
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 8.766

2.  NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition.

Authors:  K E Knowland; C A Keller; P A Wales; K Wargan; L Coy; M S Johnson; J Liu; R A Lucchesi; S D Eastham; E Fleming; Q Liang; T Leblanc; N J Livesey; K A Walker; L E Ott; S Pawson
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 8.469

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.