Literature DB >> 32740288

Decline in Unintentional Lifting Velocity Is Both Load and Exercise Specific.

Maddison Beck1, William Varner1, Lindsay LeVault1, Johnathan Boring2, Christopher A Fahs3.   

Abstract

Beck, M, Varner, W, LeVault, L, Boring, J, and Fahs, CA. Decline in unintentional lifting velocity is both load and exercise specific. J Strength Cond Res 34(10): 2709-2714, 2020-When monitoring the mean concentric velocity (MCV) for velocity-based resistance training, often a threshold in the decline in the MCV is used to regulate the number of repetitions performed. However, it is not clear if the decline in the MCV is affected by the type of exercise or the relative load used. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the decline in the MCV between the overhead press (OHP) and deadlift (DL) during sets to fatigue at different loads. Thirty individuals (23 ± 3 years) with current training experience with both the OHP and DL completed a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) protocol for the OHP and DL. Subjects then returned to the laboratory on 2 separate occasions and completed 1 set of the OHP and DL to volitional fatigue at either 70 or 90% of their 1RM in a randomized order. The open barbell system measured the MCV of all repetitions. The absolute and relative (%) decline in the MCV was calculated for each condition and compared between loads (70 vs. 90% 1RM) and between lifts (OHP vs. DL). An alpha level of 0.05 was used at the criterion for statistical significance. The absolute decline in the MCV was greatest for the 70% OHP condition (0.36 ± 0.12 m·s) followed by 90% OHP (0.19 ± 0.10 m·s), 70% DL (0.16 ± 0.08 m·s), and 90% DL (0.09 ± 0.06 m·s); all were significantly different from one another (p < 0.05) except for 70% DL vs. 90% OHP (p = 0.441). There was a greater relative decline in the MCV for the OHP compared with the DL (50.1 ± 11.8% vs. 28.5 ± 11.8%; p < 0.001) and for 70% 1RM compared with 90% 1RM (44.5 ± 12.0% vs. 34.1 ± 12.0%; p < 0.001). These data suggest the decline in the MCV is both exercise and load specific. Applying a uniform velocity decline threshold for velocity-based training may reduce training volume to different extents depending on the exercise and relative load used.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32740288     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  The Acute and Chronic Effects of Implementing Velocity Loss Thresholds During Resistance Training: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Evaluation of the Literature.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Alejandro Pérez Castilla; Amador García Ramos; Bas Van Hooren; Michael R McGuigan; Eric R Helms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Landyn M Hickmott; Philip D Chilibeck; Keely A Shaw; Scotty J Butcher
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-15

3.  The effectiveness of traditional vs. velocity-based strength training on explosive and maximal strength performance: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steffen Held; Kevin Speer; Ludwig Rappelt; Pamela Wicker; Lars Donath
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.