Literature DB >> 32740285

Performance Differences Between the Arched and Flat Bench Press in Beginner and Experienced Paralympic Powerlifters.

Frederico Ribeiro Neto1, Jefferson R Dorneles1, Rafael M Luna2, Murilo A Spina2,3, Carlos W Gonçalves1, Rodrigo R Gomes Costa1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Neto, FR, Dorneles, JR, Luna, RM, Spina, MA, Gonçalves, CW, and Gomes Costa, RR. Performance differences between the arched and flat bench press in beginner and experienced Paralympic powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 36(7): 1936-1943, 2022-The present study aimed to verify the differences of the total load, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell between the arched and flat techniques of the bench press in beginner (BG) and experienced (EG) Paralympic powerlifters. Twenty beginners (age: 34.4 years; experience: 3.3 months) and 23 experienced (age: 35.5 years; experience: 9.8 months) Paralympic powerlifters were selected from a Rehabilitation Hospital Network and a Paralympic sports center. Subjects were assessed in the one-maximum repetition test of the bench press exercise using the flat and arched bench press techniques (48-72-hour interval between sessions). Maximum strength, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell were measured to compare the techniques and the groups. The total load corrected with the Haleczko formula was significantly higher in EG compared with BG (∆ = 21.1%; effect sizes [ES] = 0.39, p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences for all analyzed outcomes comparing the arched and flat techniques. During the eccentric phase of the bench press, all assessed differences ranged from -16.6 to 23.1% and presented ES of trivial to moderate. On the concentric phase, the assessed differences ranged from -20.7 to 13.9% and presented ES of trivial to moderate. The total load, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell were not significantly different between the arched and flat techniques for experienced and beginner powerlifting athletes during both the eccentric and concentric phase of the movement. However, further analyses are essential to determine the best technique for athletes.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32740285     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  2 in total

1.  Are sEMG, Velocity and Power Influenced by Athletes' Fixation in Paralympic Powerlifting?

Authors:  Ialuska Guerra; Felipe J Aidar; Gianpiero Greco; Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto; Michele De Candia; Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral; Luca Poli; Mauro Mazini Filho; Roberto Carvutto; Ana Filipa Silva; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Georgian Badicu; Stefania Cataldi; Francesco Fischetti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Static and Dynamic Strength Indicators in Paralympic Power-Lifters with and without Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Luan José Lopes Teles; Felipe J Aidar; Dihogo Gama de Matos; Anderson Carlos Marçal; Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto; Eduardo Borba Neves; Osvaldo Costa Moreira; Frederico Ribeiro Neto; Nuno Domingos Garrido; José Vilaça-Alves; Alfonso López Díaz-de-Durana; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Ian Jeffreys; Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral; Victor Machado Reis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.