Amy J Lisanti1, Abigail C Demianczyk2, Andrew Costarino3,4, Maria G Vogiatzi5,6, Rebecca Hoffman7, Ryan Quinn8, Jesse L Chittams9, Barbara Medoff-Cooper1,10. 1. Nursing and Clinical Care Services, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Clinical Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 5. Adrenal and Puberty Center, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 6. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 7. Laboratory of Innovative & Translational Nursing Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA. 8. Office of Nursing Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA. 9. Biostatistics Analysis Core, Office of Nursing Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA. 10. School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of skin-to-skin care on stress, pain, behavioral organization, and physiologic stability of infants with critical congenital heart disease before and after neonatal cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A baseline response-paired design was used, with infants acting as their own controls before, during, and after skin-to-skin care at two distinct time points: once in the preoperative period (T1) and once in the postoperative period (T2). SETTING: Cardiac ICU and step-down unit in a large metropolitan freestanding children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 30 infants admitted preoperatively for critical congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible infants were placed into skin-to-skin care for 1 hour with their biological mothers once each at T1 and T2. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements of stress (salivary cortisol), pain and behavior state (COMFORT scale), and physiologic stability (vital signs) were assessed immediately before skin-to-skin care, 30 minutes into skin-to-skin care, and 30 minutes after skin-to-skin care ended.At both T1 and T2, infant pain scores were significantly decreased (p < 0.0001) and infants moved into a calmer behavior state (p < 0.0001) during skin-to-skin care as compared to baseline. At T1, infants also had significantly reduced heart rate (p = 0.002) and respiratory rate (p < 0.0001) and increased systolic blood pressure (p = 0.033) during skin-to-skin care. At both T1 and T2, infant cortisol remained stable and unchanged from pre-skin-to-skin care to during skin-to-skin care (p = 0.096 and p = 0.356, respectively), and significantly increased from during skin-to-skin care to post-skin-to-skin care (p = 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). Exploratory analysis revealed differences in cortisol reactivity for infants with higher baseline cortisol (> 0.3 μg/dL) versus lower (≤ 0.3 μg/dL) prior to skin-to-skin care. Infants with higher baseline cortisol at T2 experienced significantly reduced cortisol during skin-to-skin care (p = 0.025). No significant differences in demographics or baseline variables were found between infants in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Skin-to-skin care is a low-cost, low-risk intervention that promotes comfort and supports physiologic stability in infants before and after neonatal cardiac surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of skin-to-skin care on stress, pain, behavioral organization, and physiologic stability of infants with critical congenital heart disease before and after neonatal cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A baseline response-paired design was used, with infants acting as their own controls before, during, and after skin-to-skin care at two distinct time points: once in the preoperative period (T1) and once in the postoperative period (T2). SETTING: Cardiac ICU and step-down unit in a large metropolitan freestanding children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 30 infants admitted preoperatively for critical congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible infants were placed into skin-to-skin care for 1 hour with their biological mothers once each at T1 and T2. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements of stress (salivary cortisol), pain and behavior state (COMFORT scale), and physiologic stability (vital signs) were assessed immediately before skin-to-skin care, 30 minutes into skin-to-skin care, and 30 minutes after skin-to-skin care ended.At both T1 and T2, infant pain scores were significantly decreased (p < 0.0001) and infants moved into a calmer behavior state (p < 0.0001) during skin-to-skin care as compared to baseline. At T1, infants also had significantly reduced heart rate (p = 0.002) and respiratory rate (p < 0.0001) and increased systolic blood pressure (p = 0.033) during skin-to-skin care. At both T1 and T2, infant cortisol remained stable and unchanged from pre-skin-to-skin care to during skin-to-skin care (p = 0.096 and p = 0.356, respectively), and significantly increased from during skin-to-skin care to post-skin-to-skin care (p = 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). Exploratory analysis revealed differences in cortisol reactivity for infants with higher baseline cortisol (> 0.3 μg/dL) versus lower (≤ 0.3 μg/dL) prior to skin-to-skin care. Infants with higher baseline cortisol at T2 experienced significantly reduced cortisol during skin-to-skin care (p = 0.025). No significant differences in demographics or baseline variables were found between infants in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Skin-to-skin care is a low-cost, low-risk intervention that promotes comfort and supports physiologic stability in infants before and after neonatal cardiac surgery.
Authors: Rita H Pickler; Jacqueline M McGrath; Barbara A Reyna; Nancy McCain; Mary Lewis; Sharon Cone; Paul Wetzel; Al Best Journal: J Perinat Neonatal Nurs Date: 2010 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.638
Authors: Sheri S Crow; William C Oliver; Jamie A Kiefer; Melissa R Snyder; Joseph A Dearani; Zhuo Li; Harold M Burkhart Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Thomas A Miller; Justin J Elhoff; Nneka M Alexander; Samantha C Butler; Karen C Uzark; Kristi L Glotzbach; William T Mahle; Amy J Lisanti Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Amy J Lisanti; Abigail C Demianczyk; Andrew Costarino; Maria G Vogiatzi; Rebecca Hoffman; Ryan Quinn; Jesse L Chittams; Barbara Medoff-Cooper Journal: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs Date: 2020-11-09
Authors: Erica Sood; Amy Jo Lisanti; Sarah E Woolf-King; Jo Wray; Nadine Kasparian; Emily Jackson; Mary R Gregory; Keila N Lopez; Bradley S Marino; Trent Neely; Amy Randall; Sinai C Zyblewski; Cheryl L Brosig Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Amy J Lisanti; Aparna Kumar; Ryan Quinn; Jesse L Chittams; Barbara Medoff-Cooper; Abigail C Demianczyk Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 1.093