| Literature DB >> 32739441 |
Byoungjun Jeon1, GeonHui Lee2, Maierdanjiang Wufuer3, Yan Huang4, Yunhee Choi5, Sungwan Kim6, Tae Hyun Choi7.
Abstract
Current alternatives to animal testing methods for skin irritation evaluation such as reconstructed human epidermis models are not fully representing physiological response caused by skin irritants. Skin irritation is physiologically induced by the dilation and increased permeability of endothelial cells. Thus, our objectives were to mimic physiological skin irritation using a skin-on-a-chip model and compare predictive capacities with a reconstructed human epidermis model to evaluate its effectiveness. To achieve our goals, the skin-on-a-chip model, consisting of three layers representing the epidermal, dermal and endothelial components, was adapted. Cell viability was measured using the OECD TG 439 protocol for test substance evaluation. The tight junctions of endothelial cells were also observed and measured to assess physiological responses to test substances. These parameters were used to physiologically evaluate cell-to-cell interactions induced by test substances and quantify model accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Based on in vivo data, the classification accuracy of twenty test substances using a dual-parameter chip model was 80%, which is higher than other methods. Besides, the chip model was more suitable for simulating human skin irritation. Therefore, it is important to note that the dual-parameter chip model possesses an enhanced predictive capacity and could serve as an alternative to animal testing for skin irritation.Entities:
Keywords: Alternative to animal testing; Organ on a chip; Reconstructed human epidermis; Skin irritation; Skin on a chip; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32739441 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol In Vitro ISSN: 0887-2333 Impact factor: 3.500